FAR – Exam Prep - Page 87

Viewing 15 replies - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,656 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #375969
    katieshmady
    Member

    Dualmatrix, wow I feel the opposite! I've been using Becker and Wiley and feel like Becker's questions are way harder… I don't remember if one test bank simulated the actual test better than the other. I'm taking FAR again in a few hours so I'll let you know if I see any similarities!

    #375970
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I used Becker and Wiley test bank for REG and found Wiley to be harder than Becker. But than again, I had worked Becker few times while Wiley was new to me. However, at the end of the day, both test similar knowledge and though it may be hard at the beginning, by the end…you will be comfortable with Wiley!

    I found actual exam to be mix of both. I'll just say that I was glad I had worked Wiley questions.

    #375971
    FML
    Member

    I've been using Becker and for the MC, I couldn't ask for more. I've been stronger both times I failed. It's those damn sims. I'm taking it again Monday. This time I'm flying through the mc's and not looking back. Becker sets a target avg. time per mc at 1.5 mins. If you can answer the Becker practice questions with that avg. the real exam will be no problem. This leaves 1 hour and 45 mins for the sims…plenty of time.

    The last two times I had the sims I just sat there and thought about it wayy too long. This time, assuming I have at least an hour and a half, I'm going to breeze through them and enter the first instinctual answer I come up with (I've heard people say this is usually the correct answer) and then, time permitting, I will go back to see if I missed any details (semi-annual interest payment dates). If this doesn't work I'll have to consider whether or not I have the emotional and/or intellectual capacity to continue.

    I should have passed this bastard twice. Failing twice by a total of 7 points and $474 ($68 avg) leaves a bitter taste but I'm pot committed at this point.

    I'll stay posted.

    FAR-10/31/11-73, 02/27/12-70, 04/09/12-70, 07/08/12-89
    AUD-05/29/12-80
    BEC-08/31/12-84
    REG-11/28/12-85

    #375972
    katieshmady
    Member

    I agree with CPA628. It's always better to practice as many questions as possible so I'd do questions from Wiley and Becker if you have time!

    #375973
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    For simulations, does the order matter when you do journal entries? For a nonmonetary exchange, a JE might look like this:

    DR Cash

    DR Equipment-new

    DR Acc. Dep

    CR Equipment-old

    CR Gain

    Would it matter if I listed Acc. Dep on top before cash, or is there a certain order I have to list these entries?

    #375974
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi,

    Has anyone used Wiley test bank before? i got a question.

    For instance, I did the exam mode lets say #1 and i did another exam mode let say #2. I noticed that the exam # 2 contained some of exam mode #1′ MCQs and Sims. Can we set up in a way that every time we did the exam mode, The MCQs & Sims are ALLLLL brand new? because if it repeats some of the question we did previously then it wont reflect our true ability.

    Please help

    #375975
    Happy A
    Member

    @ dualmatrix, i know that the JEs order matters in the becker practice exam. however, i havent heard from anyone saying that it is the same case in the actual exam. hope the actual exam can recognize the JEs without regarding the order!

    Full-Time Studying.
    Using Becker.

    #375976
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Took my beast again today. It was definitely a harder test than last time. I know I did well on the first testlet because my second one was hard. The third one seemed hard but I couldn't really tell if the difficulty was hard or medium. The sims kicked my butt! I was struggling on time with about an hour and 15 minutes. I didn't really have a chance to utilize the authoritative literature like I usually do so I was frustrated. And for the second time, my exam froze in the middle of sims and had to be restarted. So frustrating. I didn't have time to answer the research tab because I couldn't find it quickly and didn't have time to go back. My time ran out while I was reviewing my answers for sims. Hopefully I got the two extra points I needed. Here's to waiting until may!

    #375977
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Veronica Corp. uses the revaluation model for intangible assets. On March 1, 2010, Veronica acquired intangible assets with an indefinite life for $200,000. On December 31, 2010, it was determined that the recoverable amount for these intangible assets was $180,000. On December 31, 2011, it was determined that the intangible assets had a recoverable amount of $187,000. How should Veronica recognize the gain or loss in the December 31, 2011 financial statements?

    • Unrealized gain in other comprehensive income of $7,000.

    • Loss on the income statement of $20,000.

    • Gain on the income statement of $7,000.

    • Unrealized loss in other comprehensive income of $20,000.

    Correct answer is: Unrealized gain in other comprehensive income of $7,000.

    I thought the answer would be: Gain on the income statement of $7,000. because the theory said:

    ” Revaluation gains (fair value > carrying value before revaluation) are reported in other

    comprehensive income and accumulated in equity as revaluation surplus, unless the

    revaluation gain reverses a previously recognized revaluation loss. Revaluation gains

    are reported on the income statement to the extent that they reverse a previously

    recognized revaluation loss”

    Normally, the revaluation gain $7,000 would be recorded in Comperhensive Income. I agree. But there was a loss $20,000 in earluer. wouldnt $7,000 reduce the previously regonised loss of $20,000. ???

    Please help

    #375978
    Texas27
    Member

    @CPA88888… In my opinion, and from how Becker explains it, you are right and your test bank may be wrong. The reason I say this is because by definition and from re-watching the lecture video from that subject, any gains/loss that result in a revaluation below the original cost are recognized on the income statement. Any gains and losses above the original cost are recognized in OCI as a surplus. If you go from below the original cost to above the original cost then you would recognize a gain on the income statement to the extent of previously recognized losses and the rest would be in OCI as a surplus. In this problem, the revaluation just results in a partial reversal of the loss recognized in year 1 which should be reported as a gain on the income statement to reverse part of that loss.

    On the other hand, it could be that you cannot recognize a gain on the income statement until the entire loss has been reversed by a gain but the language in IFRS and in Becker does not specifically say this and I doubt that they would just skip over that situation. So, in my opinion your answer is correct.

    BEC - Feb 2012: 80
    AUD - Feb 2012: 84
    FAR - Apr 2012: 78
    REG - May 2012: 90

    Thanks Becker!

    #375979
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks Texas 27

    I am using Becker and recently i bought Wiley Test Bank as supplemental and been working on the questions. I noticed there are many questions that are EXACT same as Becker but yet have different answers even SIMS. I found quite a few error in Wiley test bank too. I hope of buying Wiley would help me more… But so far what i experienced is very frustrating. SAME EXACTLY QUESTIONS between Becker and Wiley but different answers…. It made me so confused now instead of helping me. I dont know if it is good ideas to do two review like this.

    #375980
    Texas27
    Member

    Yea you also have to realize that CPA review material just started putting IFRS in their review materials in 2011 when it was introduced on the exam. There is a good chance that in any CPA review material that there could be some wrong interpretations or answers because there have barely been any AICPA released questions from IFRS which means these review companies are making a lot of their own questions on IFRS material. I would trust the Becker material more than the Wiley material though, but that is just me.

    BEC - Feb 2012: 80
    AUD - Feb 2012: 84
    FAR - Apr 2012: 78
    REG - May 2012: 90

    Thanks Becker!

    #375981
    Happy A
    Member

    @ CPA88888

    My opinion, dont get so hung up on the Wiley Test Bank if time doesnt allow. Becker has tremendous material that prepares us good enough for the test. Having a second review material is helpful only if you have extra time and it boosts your knowledge and confidence. I have a couple of friends who were able to pass just by sticking with Becker.

    Good Luck!

    Full-Time Studying.
    Using Becker.

    #375982

    Hi all…so I just started studying for FAR. I'm using Becker and doing the live classes. I'm reading all of your posts and everyone seems to agree that the Becker SIMS don't prepare you enough for the exam. I volunteered to be the classroom assistant for my FAR class, which means I'll get the free Final Review materials. Has anyone here used Final Review? Did you find that it better prepared you for the SIMS than the base software alone? Or should I buy a test bank like Wiley for extra practice? I take the exam on May 31 so I plan on studying my behind off this whole time.

    REG (2/24/12) - 89
    AUD (4/5/12) - 89
    FAR (5/31/12) - 91
    BEC (7/7/12) - 84

    #375983
    ledgermaven
    Member

    @CPA8888 – In my wiley book they said on page 243, 5th paragraph down, “The revaluation model requires gains and losses on revaluation to be recorded in other comprehensive income”

    This was a good review for me as I am currently in my second pass through fixed assets and IFRS has so much detail in here.

    Good luck!

Viewing 15 replies - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,656 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR – Exam Prep - Page 87’ is closed to new replies.