I think you have to be extremely cognizant of cross-using review kits (ex: Becker review with Wiley MC Banks), each picks and chooses its topics to be important, so if you study using Becker, and then try to do Wiley, your going to miss a lot of topics Wiley thinks is important but Becker breezes over quickly>> examples I have found so far are: Calculating EVA, Becker tests almost nothing on 4 Variance OH Analysis (?)– do they even test that anymore on BEC other than DM and DL variances? and a lot of heavy investment finance topics like interest rate curves and portfolio covariances, etc (which I saw almost nothing on in Becker).
God Cost Accounting, Managerial Finance and Capital Budgeting are so boring, lame and horrendously terrible. I can't see how anyone would want to do that for a job. It is the equivalent of spending 12-14 hours a day watching paint dry.