Your gender is totally irrelevant to the idea conveyed by my previous post. Though you seem to be offended at my lack of clairvoyance, and for this I apologize.
I think you will agree that there is a difference between asking about a certain topic, as in “hey do you think ticmarks could appear on the exam?”, and saying “I had a derivatives similation yesterday!”. Notice that nobody who actually took the exam chimed in to give him [the ticmark poster] positive confirmation of ever having a ticmark sim. Not because they didn't have it, but because it is against the rules. These forums are monitored by persons connected to the AICPA, and Jeff has been contacted by them directly in the past in regards to disclosure. This is a study thread, not an exam disclosure thread. You can ask about whether I think you'll have tickamarks – for some reason external confirmation helps people – but you cannot say, I had a simulation on so and so.
Lastly, my response to you is not some level-ground crusade brought by my personal greed to prevent anyone from having knowledge of what is on the exam. Exactly the opposite is true. Your post potentially misled some poor candidate into spending his last hours or day brushing up on derivatives from his FAR book, instead of devoting that time to studying auditing information which could actually help him in his exam.
AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
BEC - 74 , 77
REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
FAR - 69 , 75
Dr: perseverance
Dr: intelligence
Dr: luck
. Cr: . advisory score
.