- This topic has 893 replies, 115 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 9 months ago by
thehip41.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:59 pm #183479
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 17, 2014 at 4:07 pm #568679
ziebaParticipantWell, I came here to ask about a shortcut for bank transfer schedules and detecting kiting. They usually give you four dates and ask which one looks off. There has to be a hard rule for if C >< B then X, or something to that effect. WTB doesn't reference it well enough.
However, I saw the above linked MCQ about tracing and got even more confused. I thought V = down (like an arrow down) for existance T = up (like an arrow up) for completeness. If that's the case, then why does the MCQ suggest to trace from records down to source?
NYC – test of controls I always remember as IRON – inquiry, reperform, observe and Nspect. how are they tested? with iron. boom, all there.
AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
BEC - 74 , 77
REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
FAR - 69 , 75Dr: perseverance
Dr: intelligence
Dr: luck
. Cr: . advisory scoreMay 17, 2014 at 4:15 pm #568680
AnonymousInactiveMay 17, 2014 at 9:18 pm #568681
klink24ParticipantExplanation for one of the WTB questions:
“This answer is incorrect because this statement does not make any sense.”
FAR: 4/19/2014 - 85!
AUD: 5/27/2014 - 90!
REG: 7/18/2014 - 81!
BEC: 8/13/2014 - 84!4 up, 4 down, in 4 months.
Licensed 9/22 in NC.
May 17, 2014 at 9:19 pm #568682
NYCaccountantParticipantYes, the Ninja questions are pretty good. Which transaction cycles are the most important to know? Wiley has a list of 6 transaction cycles and I'm thinking Sales, AR and cash receipts is the most important cycle.
I read the directional testing for Wiley and that helped a lot for some reason with the transaction cycles. Now it's just commit this stuff to memory.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.May 17, 2014 at 10:08 pm #568683
JamesBJamesParticipant147 optional questions and like 20 simulations to do today. Yaaaaaaay.
Had three dreams about the CPA exam last night. One where dream me took the exam online from home and looked up all the answers in the Becker software, one where the Prometric computer crashed near the end of the exam, and one where I got the score results in the mail in a huge packet and got a 65 on FAR / 73 on REG / 90 on AUD… despite only taking FAR.
Maybe I'm studying too much. Maybe it's about time for the May scores to be released.
—
@Nycaccountant: I think the revenue and expenditures cycles are really important, and I'm hoping that understanding some of the details of the other cycles is enough. Proper segregation of duties seems to come up a lot as well.
FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88Licensed December 2015
Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!
May 18, 2014 at 6:59 pm #568684
GabeParticipantMay 18, 2014 at 7:26 pm #568685
NYCaccountantParticipantThere are no ratio analysis sims for FAR. I did a set of ratio questions and got all 10 correct. You need to have an understand of how transactions flow through financials and how basic ratios are calculated. Seems they like margin, and turnover ratios the most.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.May 18, 2014 at 7:29 pm #568686
GabeParticipantMay 18, 2014 at 8:56 pm #568687
funtiksParticipantIn which case might an auditor of an issuer render a qualified opinion on internal control?
I.
When there is a scope limitation.
II.
When there is a material weakness in internal control.
ANSWER = NEITHER
Explanation
Choice “d” is correct. A scope limitation requires the auditor to disclaim an opinion or withdraw from the engagement, and a material weakness in internal control requires the auditor to issue an adverse opinion. Neither situation would result in a qualified opinion.
I was pretty sure you can issue qualified opinion on scope limit aslong as its not pervasive. Can someone expalin
FAR - 76*, 73, 85
BEC - 69, 72, 78*, 80
AUD - 72, 71, 90
REG - 71, 74, 85AFTER 3 YEARS I'M DONE!!!
May 18, 2014 at 9:55 pm #568688
klink24ParticipantWhen negotiable securities are of considerable volume, planning by the auditor is necessary to guard against SUBSTITUTION OF SECURITIES ALREADY COUNTED FOR OTHER SECURITIES WHICH SHOULD E ON HAND BUT ARE NOT.
I think I need a real world example of this if someone could oblige. Just wondering how an auditor could could count the same security twice and not recognize that it's the same.
FAR: 4/19/2014 - 85!
AUD: 5/27/2014 - 90!
REG: 7/18/2014 - 81!
BEC: 8/13/2014 - 84!4 up, 4 down, in 4 months.
Licensed 9/22 in NC.
May 19, 2014 at 2:25 am #568689
GabeParticipant@fun that one got me too. I thought you could qualify an IC opinion too…any help from anyone else?
@nc I've never had it happen to me, but maybe the numbers/IDs are extremely similar…after a while everything starts blurring together- especially if the client doesn't differentiate them well. For instance, all securities from Stifel Nicholas are labeled Stifel Nicholas 1-27 and the accoutn numbers only differ by one number…it can get kind of confusing.
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016May 19, 2014 at 4:00 am #568690
JamesBJamesParticipantI haven't gotten to the part where Becker talks about opinions issued specifically on internal controls, but I know we talked about this in my audit class last fall, so I dug out my notes. After changing any instance of “unqualified” to “unmodified,” here's what I've got:
“The three types of opinions that can be issued on internal controls over financial reporting are: A) unmodified (if there are no material weaknesses or scope limitations), B) adverse (if there is a material weakness), or C) disclaimer of opinion (if there is a material scope limitation). A qualified opinion is not an appropriate opinion to issue regarding internal controls.”
—
I also looked at my past quizzes and, wow, I was bad at audit. Hopefully I've improved since then. If anyone wants to test their knowledge about internal control testing, here's a pretty good question that I got 2/5 points on the first time around:
Which of the following statements, if any, is / are true? Circle as many as you deem appropriate.
A) If a system of internal control is well designed, the auditor will test the controls
B) Tests of controls must be performed if control risk is set below the maximum level
C) To compensate for internal control systems that are poorly designed, the auditor will perform extensive test of controls
D) GAAS require the auditor to test controls
E) Tests of controls are used to determine the amount of misstatement in an account
Answer key: https://imgur.com/ENDK19g
—
In other news, just finished the sampling part of A5. I can see the light at the end of the tunnel.
FAR: May 1st, 2014 - 91
AUD: May 29th, 2014 - 97!
BEC: July 16th, 2014 - 91
REG: August 29th, 2014 - 88Licensed December 2015
Feel free to add me on LinkedIn by clicking my username!
May 19, 2014 at 1:37 pm #568691
QladMemberCPA has posted the general ledger and maintained the financial records of the client. He has also posted journal entries and closing entries…is his independence impaired as per AICPA and SEC? the answer is AICPA= no SEC =yes…i want to ask for AICPA, what all r they considering to come to an answer of NO…
FAR 72,71,81 🙂
AUD 64,71, 72, 75 🙂 I'm done !!!
REG 73, 74, 74, 84 🙂
BEC 76 🙂May 19, 2014 at 4:11 pm #568692
ziebaParticipantfor everyone studying transaction cycles:
I just remembered that first time I passed AUD, I skipped over A4 altogether. As in, wasn't serious about the exam yet, went through it once, didn't know which way was up decided to take my chances with the other chapters (after all how hard can it be to just pass, right?).
I came out of that exam with a 75. Three parts later, I realize just how far out on the bell curve I was given the circumstances. Unbelievable.
AUD - 75*, 88 done 5/14! (*exp)
BEC - 74 , 77
REG - 65 , 76 (10 point combooo!!)
FAR - 69 , 75Dr: perseverance
Dr: intelligence
Dr: luck
. Cr: . advisory scoreMay 19, 2014 at 4:31 pm #568693
NYCaccountantParticipant -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] AUD Study Group 2014 - Page 45’ is closed to new replies.
