- This topic has 631 replies, 115 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
JMOR.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:59 pm #183481
jeff
KeymasterI’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.
In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 20, 2014 at 6:26 pm #559450
h0wdyus
Member@dante
please note the code for 2013 is being tested in the May 2014. The $139k limit is for taxable year 2012. I had the same confusion.
The material you use which says 2013 is valid till May 31 2013333 exam not 20144444. I use wiley and the book that has 2013 written on it has the code for 2012 which is okay till 2013 May.
I bought a new wiley 2014 to get all the 2013 code. Very important. The standard deduction for example is not 11900 it is 12200 for 2013. I know it is confusing.. give it a though. there are more posts on this in the last few days. Check for mikehencho's post too.
FAR - 81 29th Aug 2013
AUD - 84
REG - 82
BEC - 89 29th Aug 2014
Using YagerFROM NJ
May 20, 2014 at 10:55 pm #559451Melans
MemberI had the question below in my homework questions for Becker. Am I correct the explanation for this question is wrong? Because Bass paid 100% of the prior year's taxes there was no delinquency penalty, but the interest still applies. Can someone confirm or correct me?
Bass Corp., a calendar year C corporation, made qualifying Year 2 estimated tax deposits based on its actual Year 1 tax liability. On March 15, Year 3, Bass filed a timely automatic extension request for its Year 2 corporate income tax return. Estimated tax deposits and the extension payment totaled $7,600. This amount was 95% of the total tax shown on Bass' final Year 2 corporate income tax return. Bass paid $400 additional tax on the final Year 2 corporate income tax return filed before the extended due date. For the Year 2 calendar year, Bass was subject to pay:
I. Interest on the $400 tax payment made in Year 3.
II. A tax delinquency penalty.
a. Neither I nor II.
b. I only.
c. Both I and II.
d. II only.
Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. A taxpayer does not extend the time for payment of tax by extending the filing deadline for the return. If there is tax owed when the return is filed, interest must be paid at the rate prescribed by IRC §6621; therefore, Bass was subject to pay interest on the $400 tax payment made in Year 3. There is no delinquency penalty if the taxpayer files its return, pays at least 90% of the tax due by the due date, and pays the balance due on or before the extended due date (all of which Bass Corp. complied with).
Choices “d”, “c”, and “a” are incorrect, per the above discussion.
AUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
BEC 7/19/13 81
REG 8/2/14 83
FAR - Jan 2015May 20, 2014 at 11:44 pm #559452h0wdyus
MemberThe Answer is correct. To avoid penalty taxpayer must pay at least 90% of tax due. Which he did.
Now the 10% he does not have to pay and still avoid penalty, but IRS wants 100% payment, so the 400 which is the 5% in this case accrues interest. So interest is still due while penalty is not.
FAR - 81 29th Aug 2013
AUD - 84
REG - 82
BEC - 89 29th Aug 2014
Using YagerFROM NJ
May 20, 2014 at 11:49 pm #559453HeartsMimiCPA
ParticipantDid Becker automatically update to the V1.1 version? I'm almost positive I elected to use V1.0 with the 2013 numbers..
AUD - 65, 89!
REG - 70, 89!
FAR - 78!
BEC - 77!Finally!
Experience 06/30/15
Ethics-DoneVA Licensed 09/15/15
May 20, 2014 at 11:51 pm #559454Lindrobe
MemberFor estimated payments, the 90% rule only comes into play for individuals (not corporations). In the MCQ above, there is no penalty on the $400 that is due because the amount due is less than $500. For individuals, if the amount due is less than $1,000 there is no penalty.
FAR 12/3/14, 87
AUD 2/3/14, 90
BEC 4/1/14, 88
REG 5/27/14, 94Licensed CPA, Indiana
"Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"
May 21, 2014 at 12:15 am #559455h0wdyus
Member@Lindrobe I am a little confused now.
Estimated tax payments must be made by every corporation whose Estimated Tax is expected to be $500. I agree the 90% rule applies to the individual. For corps it is 100%. My thought process is as follows.
Total tax due was $8000 ( if 95% is 7600 then 100% is 8000). Now the corp avoided penalty by paying 100 % of last years tax liablitly as estimated tax for the current year. Eventually they were short by 400 which they found out when the return was files and tax for current year was computed. So they paid $400 less. Should there not be interest on amount of original tax not paid by the due date ?
The 90% is wrong in the answer for sure., but I would think interest is still due and no penalty is due.
FAR - 81 29th Aug 2013
AUD - 84
REG - 82
BEC - 89 29th Aug 2014
Using YagerFROM NJ
May 21, 2014 at 12:35 am #559456Lindrobe
MemberWhen you say that “the corp avoided penalty by paying 100% of last year's tax”, that statement is incorrect. The corp avoided penalty because the tax due is less than $500. The “100% of last year's tax” is not even a consideration for corps (only individuals). The corp would still have to pay interest on the $400.
FAR 12/3/14, 87
AUD 2/3/14, 90
BEC 4/1/14, 88
REG 5/27/14, 94Licensed CPA, Indiana
"Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"
May 21, 2014 at 12:56 am #559457h0wdyus
Memberthe tax due was $8000 out of which $7600 was paid.
Regarding $500
Here is the text from IRS.gov.
“If you are filing as a corporation you generally have to make estimated tax payments for your corporation if you expect it to owe tax of $500 or more when you file its return”
https://www.irs.gov/Businesses/Small-Businesses-&-Self-Employed/Estimated-Taxes
It does not say you owe $500 of Estimated Taxes, it says you owe $500 of Tax..
So if a corp has income and its Tax amount computed on Form 1120C comes to 500 or more, then you should be paying Estimated taxes as per schedule. In this case the Tax computed on Form 1120C is $8000 and not $400 so Estimated Tax is due. $400 is what they did not pay out of the $8000.
Anyway I am getting back to studying. Good luck on the exam. I am due for Reg on 30th May. Working on Debtor-Creditor realtionship. God bless us.
FAR - 81 29th Aug 2013
AUD - 84
REG - 82
BEC - 89 29th Aug 2014
Using YagerFROM NJ
May 21, 2014 at 1:00 am #559458Lindrobe
MemberGood luck, Howdyus!
FAR 12/3/14, 87
AUD 2/3/14, 90
BEC 4/1/14, 88
REG 5/27/14, 94Licensed CPA, Indiana
"Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"
May 21, 2014 at 3:15 am #559459zombiecpa
MemberSec. 179
2013 expense 500,000. Is this expense limited to taxable income? and remainder can be carryover?
50% bonus depreciation and 1st year depreciation. Are those amounts can be deducted in computing NOL?
FAR 85
AUD 83
BEC 76
REG 90May 21, 2014 at 4:38 am #559460zxiao
Member@zombiecpa
500,000 is the maximum expense for 179. 250,000 of maximum 500,000 is the expense limit for business realty. If both personalty and realty included in the question, deduct 250,000 of the realty first, and then apply the rest expense to the maximum of 500,000 (total). The maximum amount is reduced dollar for dollar by the amount of property placed in service during the taxable year that exceeds 2,000,000. I think 179 expense could carryover. Bonus depreciation is claimed after 179, so I guess you couldn't use bonus depreciation when a loss exists.
I Can Do This!!!!!
BEC: 89
AUD: 99
REG: 93
FAR: 8/2/2014May 21, 2014 at 5:00 am #559461NySinghCPA1985
Membercan anyone advise if stock options is a heavily tested item?? sitting for the exam next week and am cluless as to stock options. Its a new topic on exam as per becker material. Any chances I get a simulation thrown at me exam day?
FAR 1/30/14 86 beast is slayed
REG 5/30/12 81 expired :/ Retake April or May 2014
AUD 5/24/13 85
BEC 10/07/13 80May 21, 2014 at 5:06 am #559462NySinghCPA1985
Membercan anyone advise if stock options is a heavily tested item?? sitting for the exam next week and am cluless as to stock options. Its a new topic on exam as per becker material. Any chances I get a simulation thrown at me exam day?
FAR 1/30/14 86 beast is slayed
REG 5/30/12 81 expired :/ Retake April or May 2014
AUD 5/24/13 85
BEC 10/07/13 80May 21, 2014 at 5:06 am #559463NySinghCPA1985
Membercan anyone advise if stock options is a heavily tested item?? sitting for the exam next week and am cluless as to stock options. Its a new topic on exam as per becker material. Any chances I get a simulation thrown at me exam day?
FAR 1/30/14 86 beast is slayed
REG 5/30/12 81 expired :/ Retake April or May 2014
AUD 5/24/13 85
BEC 10/07/13 80May 21, 2014 at 5:21 am #559464Juliemiddle
MemberCan anyone help with Dividends Received Deduction when the corp. has an ordinary business loss? I can't figure out when to apply the 70%/80%/100% to the net Taxable Income (after adding in Dividend Income) or just the Dividend Income.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 37’ is closed to new replies.