[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 35

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183481
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 511 through 525 (of 631 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #559420
    zombiecpa
    Member

    @Topsya, Thank you!

    FAR 85
    AUD 83
    BEC 76
    REG 90

    #559421
    greg422
    Member

    Question Regarding Rule 504:

    My study materials from Roger and Wiley say that general solicitation is allowed under 504. However, there is a MC question on Wiley and the answer says “This answer is incorrect because Regulation D specifically does not permit the use of general solicitation.”

    Which is correct? I thought general solicitation was OK for 504?

    REG - 82
    AUD - 97
    BEC - 81
    FAR - 84
    DONE!

    #559422
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    General solicitation and advertising are generally not allowed under 504 Reg D. However, if either of two conditions are met than general solicitation and advertising are allowed: a.) state law permits general solicitation as long as sales are to accredited investors only, or b.) the securities are registered under a state law requiring public filing and delivery of a substantive disclosure document to investors before sale.

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559423
    h0wdyus
    Member

    For those who have taken the REG exam and are about to take.

    In the exam are they testing 2013 limits i.e Standard deductions ; Gift Tax exempt limit, Exemptions.

    Wiley book for 2013 does mention limits for 2012 taxable year. Which are we supposed to know for exam ending May 2014.

    FAR - 81 29th Aug 2013
    AUD - 84
    REG - 82
    BEC - 89 29th Aug 2014
    Using Yager

    FROM NJ

    #559424
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    Know the 2013 tax code. 2014 tax code testing begins in July

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559425
    h0wdyus
    Member

    Thanks MikeHoncho , I am in trouble here. 🙂 .

    FAR - 81 29th Aug 2013
    AUD - 84
    REG - 82
    BEC - 89 29th Aug 2014
    Using Yager

    FROM NJ

    #559426

    woooow…just took REG test…To say that I am frustrated is not to say anything. I studied and studied and studied (2 months every day!), but I still got out of the test feeling like I knew only 40% of the questions… SIMs were horrific… Does anyone have the same feeling about the exam? and what does it usually mean with REG: fail/there is still hope?

    one last exam score to wait for......
    FAR - 78
    BEC - 84
    AUD - 92
    REG - 88

    #559427
    h0wdyus
    Member

    How was the distribution of questions between BLaw and Taxation. Any insights will be helpful.

    FAR - 81 29th Aug 2013
    AUD - 84
    REG - 82
    BEC - 89 29th Aug 2014
    Using Yager

    FROM NJ

    #559428
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    No word on where I can get a full list of exclusion amounts? Ugh.

    #559429
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    @howdy

    You will see a good amount of business law questions but more tax questions. I believe the percentages in the AICPA CSO are pretty accurate .

    @Sunni

    I haven't come across an entire list of them. But just google it and you will find plenty

    @wannabeCali

    I felt the same as you leaving the exam. Those pesky task based simulations! I found a lot of helpful posts in the REG Experience Thread. It seems many people felt the same way leaving the exam but ended up passing. Best of wishes

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559430

    Well, my exam was pretty heavy on Business Law….More than I would want… But even the tax questions (MC) were ridiculous: the situations they put in those questions included some scenarios that would involve 3-4 different tax issues at once… It took me a while to even understand what it was they wanted to begin with.. Very frustrating exam… But I would def agree with the previous comments regarding “not underestimating Business Law” – for sure! Know those chapters very well. And, if I am going to have to retake this exam, I will def make sure I re-read chapter 3!

    one last exam score to wait for......
    FAR - 78
    BEC - 84
    AUD - 92
    REG - 88

    #559431
    Topsya
    Member

    @wannabeCaliCPA

    You mean Becker Chapter 3? C-Corps and S-Corps?

    AUD - 90
    FAR - 83
    BEC - 81
    REG - 80
    ETHICS - 100

    #559432
    simmy3060
    Member

    I have a question. The AMT is totally confusing me. I do taxes but have never had to compute this tax cause the software does it for me. I understand that the “Preferences” get added back to Reg Taxable Income. But what about Tax deductions, Interest, Medical, Miscellaneous and Exemptions? Am I suppose to add these back or subtract them or does it depend on what I did with them for regular income? HELP!!!

    BEC 1/4/14 48
    AUD 5/29/14 62

    "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." (Phil 4:13)

    #559433
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I was working through a ninja MCQ and I got this wrong and I don't get why.

    The amount required to be paid in estimated tax installments by a corporation is the lesser of 100% of the tax shown on its return for the preceding 12-month tax year (if some income tax was due) or what percentage of the tax shown on its return for the current year? (determined on the basis of actual income or annualized income)

    Answer: A. 100%

    The estimated tax payment required in installments is the lesser of:

    100% of the tax shown on the return for the preceding year or

    100% of the tax shown for the current year.

    I thought it was 90% of the current year or 100% of the prior year? Am I thinking of some other rule and confusing it with this? Possibly for individuals?

    #559434
    Lindrobe
    Member

    Hi Dante. You are confusing with the rule for individuals. There is no 90% rule for corps.

    FAR 12/3/14, 87
    AUD 2/3/14, 90
    BEC 4/1/14, 88
    REG 5/27/14, 94

    Licensed CPA, Indiana

    "Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"

Viewing 15 replies - 511 through 525 (of 631 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 35’ is closed to new replies.