[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 32

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183481
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 631 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #559375
    Lindrobe
    Member

    Mike, I think that makes sense. No memorization of these forms planned here either.

    FAR 12/3/14, 87
    AUD 2/3/14, 90
    BEC 4/1/14, 88
    REG 5/27/14, 94

    Licensed CPA, Indiana

    "Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"

    #559376
    Topsya
    Member

    Here is the question from Wiley Book:

    I agree that (c) is the correct answer.

    BUT WOULD (D) ALSO BE CORRECT?

    Mathews is an agent for Sears with the express authority to solicit orders from customers in a geographic area assigned by Sears. Mathews has no authority to grant discounts or to collect payment on orders solicited. Mathews secured an order from Davidson for $1,000 less a 10% discount if Davidson makes immediate payment. Davidson had previously done business with Sears through Mathews but this was the first time that a discount-payment offer had been made. Davidson gave Mathews a check for $900 and, thereafter, Mathews turned in both the check and the order to Sears. The order clearly indicated that a 10% discount had been given by Mathews. Sears shipped the order and cashed the check. Later, Sears attempted to collect $100 as the balance owed on the order from Davidson. Which of the following is correct?

    a. Sears can collect the $100 from Davidson because Mathews contracted outside the scope of his express or implied authority.

    b. Sears cannot collect the $100 from Davidson because Mathews, as an agent with express authority to solicit orders, had implied authority to give discounts and collect.

    c. Sears cannot collect the $100 from Davidson as Sears has ratified the discount granted and made to Mathews. – CORRECT

    d. Sears cannot collect the $100 from Davidson because, although Mathews had no express or implied authority to grant a discount and collect, Mathews had apparent authority to do so.

    AUD - 90
    FAR - 83
    BEC - 81
    REG - 80
    ETHICS - 100

    #559377
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    That's a good question. From the info provided it seems Davidson is aware of the principal so there is apparent authority.

    Sears may still be liable to Davidson, provided Davidson reasonably believed that Mathews worked for Sears and had the authority to give discounts and collect.

    That being said, I think you could argue that D is true but C is the better answer. So my guess would be yes D is also correct.

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559378
    Topsya
    Member

    Thanks Mike!

    I hope exam will not have such questions, where both answers are arguably correct… ugh….

    AUD - 90
    FAR - 83
    BEC - 81
    REG - 80
    ETHICS - 100

    #559379
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    @Lindrobe

    In your question about the IRA deduction, do you understand the formula the Ninja mcq explanation uses?

    More specific:

    They are reducing the $4,000 contribution by $800

    I can't figure out the $800 calculation. This is how they calculated it:

    $800 = (4,000 times 2 divided by 10)

    Is the 4,000 the IRA contribution amount or the amount by which AGI exceeds the AGI threshold?

    And why is 4,000 multiplied by 2 and divided by 10? Where did 2 and 10 come from?

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559380
    HeartsMimiCPA
    Participant

    I'm at the point in my studies where I'm almost done going through the material and i'm starting to review. Going back to these questions in the beginning…I feel like an idiot! Especially when it comes to anything related to C corps, S Corps, PHC…this is going to be a nightmare

    AUD - 65, 89!
    REG - 70, 89!
    FAR - 78!
    BEC - 77!

    Finally!
    Experience 06/30/15
    Ethics-Done

    VA Licensed 09/15/15

    #559381
    Vlakmir
    Member

    I am unsure but I can't imaging Thresholds for IRA's a necessity in this test.

    Some thresholds, yes. But not this one…I haven't seen it on any of my MCQs in Bisk.

    REG - 92
    AUD - 90
    BEC - 82
    FAR - 82
    BISK Review Materials
    DONE! /Happydance

    #559382
    Lindrobe
    Member

    Mike, I do not at all understand the formula that the NINJA mcq is using. The $4000 is the contribution amount and I have no idea why it is being multiplied by 2/10. I know that most are saying you don't need to memorize the thresholds, but the calculation just doesn't seem right to me. I was just more curious than anything as to why it is being calculated as it is.

    FAR 12/3/14, 87
    AUD 2/3/14, 90
    BEC 4/1/14, 88
    REG 5/27/14, 94

    Licensed CPA, Indiana

    "Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"

    #559383
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    Ok thanks. I finally came across it in ninja mcq today and was just wondering.

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559384
    simmy3060
    Member

    OK. I am panicking now. I take REG on Friday May 16th at 8am. NONE OF THIS IS STICKING!!!! It is not making sense. I am kind of OK with the taxation for individuals, but the taxation for corps and s corps and all that other stuff is just confusing the crap out of me. AND all those pneumonics and the limits and the and the and the. I think I need to find an actual class to attend. Maybe that would work better? I don't know. I am tired and I am stressing out over this. I do not want to fail it because someone paid for it for me but I just don't know what to do. I am just about in tears over this.

    BEC 1/4/14 48
    AUD 5/29/14 62

    "I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." (Phil 4:13)

    #559385
    Lindrobe
    Member

    simmy3060, how much time have you put in? Also, what study methods have you tried?

    FAR 12/3/14, 87
    AUD 2/3/14, 90
    BEC 4/1/14, 88
    REG 5/27/14, 94

    Licensed CPA, Indiana

    "Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"

    #559386
    Juliemiddle
    Member

    Hi, all…I need help w/ Sec. 1231 Recapture. From what I understand…

    -Sec. 1245: gain up to the amt. of accumulated depreciation is characterized as Ordinary Income, the rest of the gain is Sec. 1231 Gain (which is L/T Capital Gain?)

    -Sec. 1250: gain up to the amt. of STRAIGHT-LINE depreciation characterized as…?? The rest of the gain is Sec. 1231 Gain (again, is this L/T Capital Gain?)

    -Sec. 291: the difference between actual acc. depreciation taken and straight-line x 20% = Ordinary Income

    Please correct me where I've gone wrong.

    AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
    BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
    REG: 91 - May, 2014
    FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONE

    CPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)

    #559387
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    – 1245 Recapture (Same for Individuals and Corporations):

    1245 gain – to the extent of depreciation – Ordinary income

    1231 gain – any gain leftover after subtracting depreciation – Capital gain

    – 1250 Recapture (Individual)

    1250 gain – to the extent depreciation exceeds Straight line depreciation – Ordinary income

    25% gain – the amount of straight line depreciation – 25%

    1231 gain – any gain leftover after 1250 and 25% gain recapture – Capital gain

    – 1250 Recapture (Corporation)

    1250 gain – to the extent depreciation exceeds Straight line depreciation – Ordinary income

    Sec. 291 gain – 1245 gain minus 1250 gain = excess gain. Excess gain multiplied by 20% – Ordinary income

    1231 gain – any gain leftover after 1250 and Sec. 291 gain recapture – Capital gain

    – 1231 Netting:

    1231 loss – To the extent 1231 losses exceed 1231 gains – Ordinary loss

    1231 gain – To the extent 1231 gains exceed 1231 losses – LT capital gain (Subject to LookBack Rule)

    *If netting leads to 1231 gain, then gain is subject to recapture through the LookBack Rule.

    – LookBack Rule: Net 1231 gains must be offset by net 1231 losses from the 5 preceding years that haven't been recaptured.

    The gain that offsets 1231 losses from 5 preceding years – Ordinary loss

    The 1231 gain that remains after netting – Capital gain

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559388
    MikeHoncho
    Member

    Oops. Made a mistake in the second to last sentence.

    Corrected version:

    The gain that offsets 1231 losses from 5 preceding years – Ordinary income

    Done: 5/22/14

    "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
    - Ernest Hemingway

    #559389
    salamandyo
    Member

    Hi everyone,

    I am kind of new here. Anyway, I am a little nervous about my upcoming Reg test on Monday (19th!). Part of me thinks I should wait till July to take it since I really only know the first two chapters of Reg and the rest I kinda know (using Becker, total chapters = 8). The only reason why I don't want to wait till July is because I still need to pass FAR (last time I got a 74, ouch!) and my first test expires on October 31st. Any advice would be greatly appreciated here!

    Thanks!

    AUD – 71, 80 – PASSED, Expires Oct 2014

    BEC – 76 – PASSED, Expires Jan 2015

    FAR – 71, 72, 74 – FAIL…retake July 18

    REG – take April 19

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 631 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 32’ is closed to new replies.