- This topic has 631 replies, 115 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
JMOR.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:59 pm #183481
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 10, 2014 at 1:23 pm #559375
LindrobeMemberMike, I think that makes sense. No memorization of these forms planned here either.
FAR 12/3/14, 87
AUD 2/3/14, 90
BEC 4/1/14, 88
REG 5/27/14, 94Licensed CPA, Indiana
"Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"
May 11, 2014 at 10:36 pm #559376
TopsyaMemberHere is the question from Wiley Book:
I agree that (c) is the correct answer.
BUT WOULD (D) ALSO BE CORRECT?
Mathews is an agent for Sears with the express authority to solicit orders from customers in a geographic area assigned by Sears. Mathews has no authority to grant discounts or to collect payment on orders solicited. Mathews secured an order from Davidson for $1,000 less a 10% discount if Davidson makes immediate payment. Davidson had previously done business with Sears through Mathews but this was the first time that a discount-payment offer had been made. Davidson gave Mathews a check for $900 and, thereafter, Mathews turned in both the check and the order to Sears. The order clearly indicated that a 10% discount had been given by Mathews. Sears shipped the order and cashed the check. Later, Sears attempted to collect $100 as the balance owed on the order from Davidson. Which of the following is correct?
a. Sears can collect the $100 from Davidson because Mathews contracted outside the scope of his express or implied authority.
b. Sears cannot collect the $100 from Davidson because Mathews, as an agent with express authority to solicit orders, had implied authority to give discounts and collect.
c. Sears cannot collect the $100 from Davidson as Sears has ratified the discount granted and made to Mathews. – CORRECT
d. Sears cannot collect the $100 from Davidson because, although Mathews had no express or implied authority to grant a discount and collect, Mathews had apparent authority to do so.
AUD - 90
FAR - 83
BEC - 81
REG - 80
ETHICS - 100May 11, 2014 at 11:06 pm #559377
MikeHonchoMemberThat's a good question. From the info provided it seems Davidson is aware of the principal so there is apparent authority.
Sears may still be liable to Davidson, provided Davidson reasonably believed that Mathews worked for Sears and had the authority to give discounts and collect.
That being said, I think you could argue that D is true but C is the better answer. So my guess would be yes D is also correct.
Done: 5/22/14
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
- Ernest HemingwayMay 11, 2014 at 11:13 pm #559378
TopsyaMemberThanks Mike!
I hope exam will not have such questions, where both answers are arguably correct… ugh….
AUD - 90
FAR - 83
BEC - 81
REG - 80
ETHICS - 100May 12, 2014 at 7:08 pm #559379
MikeHonchoMemberIn your question about the IRA deduction, do you understand the formula the Ninja mcq explanation uses?
More specific:
They are reducing the $4,000 contribution by $800
I can't figure out the $800 calculation. This is how they calculated it:
$800 = (4,000 times 2 divided by 10)
Is the 4,000 the IRA contribution amount or the amount by which AGI exceeds the AGI threshold?
And why is 4,000 multiplied by 2 and divided by 10? Where did 2 and 10 come from?
Done: 5/22/14
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
- Ernest HemingwayMay 12, 2014 at 7:51 pm #559380
HeartsMimiCPAParticipantI'm at the point in my studies where I'm almost done going through the material and i'm starting to review. Going back to these questions in the beginning…I feel like an idiot! Especially when it comes to anything related to C corps, S Corps, PHC…this is going to be a nightmare
AUD - 65, 89!
REG - 70, 89!
FAR - 78!
BEC - 77!Finally!
Experience 06/30/15
Ethics-DoneVA Licensed 09/15/15
May 12, 2014 at 9:27 pm #559381
VlakmirMemberI am unsure but I can't imaging Thresholds for IRA's a necessity in this test.
Some thresholds, yes. But not this one…I haven't seen it on any of my MCQs in Bisk.
REG - 92
AUD - 90
BEC - 82
FAR - 82
BISK Review Materials
DONE! /HappydanceMay 12, 2014 at 10:42 pm #559382
LindrobeMemberMike, I do not at all understand the formula that the NINJA mcq is using. The $4000 is the contribution amount and I have no idea why it is being multiplied by 2/10. I know that most are saying you don't need to memorize the thresholds, but the calculation just doesn't seem right to me. I was just more curious than anything as to why it is being calculated as it is.
FAR 12/3/14, 87
AUD 2/3/14, 90
BEC 4/1/14, 88
REG 5/27/14, 94Licensed CPA, Indiana
"Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"
May 12, 2014 at 11:10 pm #559383
MikeHonchoMemberOk thanks. I finally came across it in ninja mcq today and was just wondering.
Done: 5/22/14
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
- Ernest HemingwayMay 13, 2014 at 12:01 am #559384
simmy3060MemberOK. I am panicking now. I take REG on Friday May 16th at 8am. NONE OF THIS IS STICKING!!!! It is not making sense. I am kind of OK with the taxation for individuals, but the taxation for corps and s corps and all that other stuff is just confusing the crap out of me. AND all those pneumonics and the limits and the and the and the. I think I need to find an actual class to attend. Maybe that would work better? I don't know. I am tired and I am stressing out over this. I do not want to fail it because someone paid for it for me but I just don't know what to do. I am just about in tears over this.
BEC 1/4/14 48
AUD 5/29/14 62"I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." (Phil 4:13)
May 13, 2014 at 12:16 am #559385
LindrobeMembersimmy3060, how much time have you put in? Also, what study methods have you tried?
FAR 12/3/14, 87
AUD 2/3/14, 90
BEC 4/1/14, 88
REG 5/27/14, 94Licensed CPA, Indiana
"Successful people do things that unsuccessful people don't want to do"
May 13, 2014 at 5:00 am #559386
JuliemiddleMemberHi, all…I need help w/ Sec. 1231 Recapture. From what I understand…
-Sec. 1245: gain up to the amt. of accumulated depreciation is characterized as Ordinary Income, the rest of the gain is Sec. 1231 Gain (which is L/T Capital Gain?)
-Sec. 1250: gain up to the amt. of STRAIGHT-LINE depreciation characterized as…?? The rest of the gain is Sec. 1231 Gain (again, is this L/T Capital Gain?)
-Sec. 291: the difference between actual acc. depreciation taken and straight-line x 20% = Ordinary Income
Please correct me where I've gone wrong.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
May 13, 2014 at 11:06 am #559387
MikeHonchoMember– 1245 Recapture (Same for Individuals and Corporations):
1245 gain – to the extent of depreciation – Ordinary income
1231 gain – any gain leftover after subtracting depreciation – Capital gain
– 1250 Recapture (Individual)
1250 gain – to the extent depreciation exceeds Straight line depreciation – Ordinary income
25% gain – the amount of straight line depreciation – 25%
1231 gain – any gain leftover after 1250 and 25% gain recapture – Capital gain
– 1250 Recapture (Corporation)
1250 gain – to the extent depreciation exceeds Straight line depreciation – Ordinary income
Sec. 291 gain – 1245 gain minus 1250 gain = excess gain. Excess gain multiplied by 20% – Ordinary income
1231 gain – any gain leftover after 1250 and Sec. 291 gain recapture – Capital gain
– 1231 Netting:
1231 loss – To the extent 1231 losses exceed 1231 gains – Ordinary loss
1231 gain – To the extent 1231 gains exceed 1231 losses – LT capital gain (Subject to LookBack Rule)
*If netting leads to 1231 gain, then gain is subject to recapture through the LookBack Rule.
– LookBack Rule: Net 1231 gains must be offset by net 1231 losses from the 5 preceding years that haven't been recaptured.
The gain that offsets 1231 losses from 5 preceding years – Ordinary loss
The 1231 gain that remains after netting – Capital gain
Done: 5/22/14
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
- Ernest HemingwayMay 13, 2014 at 1:09 pm #559388
MikeHonchoMemberOops. Made a mistake in the second to last sentence.
Corrected version:
The gain that offsets 1231 losses from 5 preceding years – Ordinary income
Done: 5/22/14
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut."
- Ernest HemingwayMay 13, 2014 at 1:14 pm #559389
salamandyoMemberHi everyone,
I am kind of new here. Anyway, I am a little nervous about my upcoming Reg test on Monday (19th!). Part of me thinks I should wait till July to take it since I really only know the first two chapters of Reg and the rest I kinda know (using Becker, total chapters = 8). The only reason why I don't want to wait till July is because I still need to pass FAR (last time I got a 74, ouch!) and my first test expires on October 31st. Any advice would be greatly appreciated here!
Thanks!
AUD – 71, 80 – PASSED, Expires Oct 2014
BEC – 76 – PASSED, Expires Jan 2015
FAR – 71, 72, 74 – FAIL…retake July 18
REG – take April 19
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 32’ is closed to new replies.
