[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 28

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183481
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 406 through 420 (of 631 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #559315
    Kls238
    Member

    Should I be concerned that I'm struggling with practice SIMS? I'm averaging 75-85% on MCQs, but I'm all over the place on SIMs. I'm ok with some, but others I can't seem to do well on even after my send attempt. I feel like I understand some concepts much better in a MCQ format for whatever reason. Should I practice more SIMs or not bother at this point? My test is in a week.

    Passed all sections.

    #559316
    Topsya
    Member

    Here is the question from Wiley book:

    Edgar, CPA, reviewed the financial statements of Yoke Company (a nonissuer company). In performing the review Edgar failed to discover that a supplier had been overbilling Yoke for purchases for a number of years. Yoke filed a lawsuit against Edgar for negligence in performing the review.

    Which of the following would not likely be part of Edgar’s defense in this lawsuit?

    a. Contributory negligence.

    b. Performance of the engagement in accordance with Statement for Accounting and Review Services.

    c. A review cannot be relied upon to detect fraud.

    d. Misrepresentations by management.

    AUD - 90
    FAR - 83
    BEC - 81
    REG - 80
    ETHICS - 100

    #559317
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have a very basic Partnership Tax question that I keep seeing contradicting answers on between the Wiley text, WTB, and NINJA MCQ: If no provision is made for in the partnership agreement, are income and losses based on an equal share between the number of partners, or is it based on the capital contribution?

    #559318
    Topsya
    Member

    Profits and losses in Partnership are shared equally unless agreement specifies otherwise. Even if contributed capital is not equal.

    AUD - 90
    FAR - 83
    BEC - 81
    REG - 80
    ETHICS - 100

    #559319
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, that's what I was going with for so long and going through WTB problems I missed previously I came head-on with this and it threw me for a loop. Appreciate the feedback!

    #559320
    mmp7183
    Participant

    Not sure how my “exam” mates are (for REG and BEC) but things got so busy for me that I had to reschedule my REG and BEC to May and July, respectively (was supposed to take both in April then May). 🙁 So now I only have one full month to review REG (almost starting from scratch)! Anything on REG that I should be wary of?

    Oh-Hey-Yoh Candidate

    FAR - 89 Dec 2013 (CPAExcel)
    AUD - 89 Feb 2014 (CPAExcel)
    BEC - 83 Aug 2014 (Becker)
    REG - 85 Oct 2014 (Becker)

    CMA (Aug 2011), CFSA (Dec 2008), Philippine CPA (Nov 2004)

    #559321
    Melans
    Member

    mmp – I just started back to REG as well. I previously got through part of chapter 4. Lots of tax stuff, and I am told that is what you should focus on.

    AUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
    BEC 7/19/13 81
    REG 8/2/14 83
    FAR - Jan 2015

    #559322
    lindafine
    Member

    Hi guys,

    I'm having trouble grasping the difference between void and voidable contracts. I'm using Becker review and read law articles online. Some websites say void contracts are illegal but one of Becker's examples for voidable contracts is misrepresenting material facts. To me, that's illegal. So, what is a good way of telling the two apart besides memorizing which examples are void or voidable?

    My second concern is preparing for the authoritative literature section of the REG exam. How did you guys become comfortable with using it? I can never find what I'm looking for…After typing in my search criteria I either get hundreds of results or nothing at all. Any tips would be appreciated. Thanks.

    #559323
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    you may be casting too wide of a net with your initial searches. I always start with a very specific keyword search and if I get no results I refine my search to be less specific. The NINJA audio actually does a pretty great job with the difference between Void and Voidable contracts.

    #559324
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If you are having trouble memorizing the differences its best to think about it in terms of being illegal. Fraud in Execution, illegal, or duress (extreme) which I always think about as physical threats or putting someone in immediate harm's way. The other Voidable qualifications are sketchy in terms of legality: Fraud in the Inducement, Not competent to contract, undue influence (think relationships between parties), simple duress. I don't have a memory device for these, I think you start by understanding the difference between Fraud in the Execution and Fraud in the Inducement and work a handful of MCQs that deals with these topics to nail it down. Good luck!

    #559325
    lindafine
    Member

    Thanks for your help! I don't know what fraud in the inducement/execution means but voidable in terms of sketchy will stick with me.

    #559326
    Melans
    Member

    Anyone know where a good alimony recapture example is? Becker does not discuss the topic in depth, but Wiley has some practice questions on it.

    AUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
    BEC 7/19/13 81
    REG 8/2/14 83
    FAR - Jan 2015

    #559327
    Kls238
    Member

    @melans NINJA notes

    Passed all sections.

    #559328
    Topsya
    Member

    @Melans

    Wiley book has a pretty good example in the text… did you see it?

    AUD - 90
    FAR - 83
    BEC - 81
    REG - 80
    ETHICS - 100

    #559329
    TargetCPA
    Participant

    @ Melans:

    Tim and Nicole Wendler were divorced in 2011. Under the terms of their divorce decree, Tim paid alimony to Nicole at the rate of $60,000 in 2011, $25,000 in 2012, and nothing in 2013. What amount of alimony recapture must be included in Tim’s gross income for 2013?

    $0

    $10,000

    $35,000

    $47,500

    Formula for this ALIMONY RECAP:

    R3 = R1 + R2

    R2 = P2 – (P3 + 15,000)

    R1 = P1 – [ (P2 – R2 + P3)/2 + 15,000]

    Shortcut for Year 3 Recapture = P1 + P2 – 2P3 – 37,500

    2nd year alimony – (3rd year alimony +15,000) = 3rd year recap

    1 yr. alimony – [(2nd yr alimony – 3rd year recap + 3rd yr alimony)/2] – 15,000 = 2nd year recap

    3rd year recap + 2nd year recap = total recap as gross income in year 3

    2nd year recapture: 25,000″2nd year alimony” – (0″3rd year alimony” + 15,000) = 10,000

    1st year recapture: 60,000″1st year alimony” – ([25,000 – 10,000″2nd year recapture” + 0] / 2) + 15,000 = 37,500

    Total recapture would be: 10,000″2nd year recapture” + 37,500″1st year recapture” = 47,500

    ALIMONY RECAP RULE:

    The rule applies when the payments decrease or terminate during the first three calendars years post-divorce and:

    1.) The total payments made in the third year decrease by $15,000 or more from the payments made in the second year; (or)

    2.) The payments made in the second year and the third year are substantially less than the payments made in the first year.

Viewing 15 replies - 406 through 420 (of 631 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 28’ is closed to new replies.