- This topic has 631 replies, 115 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
JMOR.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:59 pm #183481
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 14, 2014 at 4:54 pm #559044
TargetCPAParticipant@ mightyjet, Section 1244 of the tax code allows losses from the sale of shares of small, domestic corporations to be deducted as ordinary losses instead of as capital losses up to a maximum of $50,000 for individual tax returns or $100,000 for joint returns.
So ordinary loss is not taken into consideration for capital loss calculation.
March 14, 2014 at 4:58 pm #559045
TargetCPAParticipantMarch 14, 2014 at 5:03 pm #559046
golfball7773ParticipantThanks!
I am using technically Wiley (CPAexcel). My friend won the course in college a couple years ago and now he decided he doesn't want to be a CPA, so he is letting me use the course. I also have Ninja 10 point combo lite but am thinking about the Wiley Test bank.
I am trying to get through the videos in the next week or so then rewrite my notes. Tonight I want to finish income after work and then a run a few errands and maybe a brewisky!
FAR: 63, 55, 62
REG: 65, 77*
AUD: Fail, 64, 71
BEC: 72, 74, 81*expired
March 14, 2014 at 5:21 pm #559047
JustWant 75MemberTargetCPA is the answer $0?
Becker, Ninja Audio + Notes
FAR: 80 (Aug 2013)
AUD: 91 (Nov 2013)
BEC: 79 (Feb 2014)
REG: 80 (May 2014)March 14, 2014 at 5:53 pm #559048
TargetCPAParticipant@ JustWant 75, Thanks for trying to answer this MCQ. I also felt little difficulty in ALIMONY RECAP.
Solution:
Formula for this ALIMONY RECAP:
2nd year alimony – (3rd year alimony +15,000) = 3rd year recap
1 yr. alimony – [(2nd yr alimony – 3rd year recap + 3rd yr alimony)/2] – 15,000 = 2nd year recap
3rd year recap + 2nd year recap = total recap as gross income in year 3
2nd year recapture: 25,000″2nd year alimony” – (0″3rd year alimony” + 15,000) = 10,000
1st year recapture: 60,000″1st year alimony” – ([25,000 – 10,000″2nd year recapture” + 0] / 2) + 15,000 = 37,500
Total recapture would be: 10,000″2nd year recapture” + 37,500″1st year recapture” = 47,500
ALIMONY RECAP RULE:
The rule applies when the payments decrease or terminate during the first three calendars years post-divorce and:
1.) The total payments made in the third year decrease by $15,000 or more from the payments made in the second year; (or)
2.) The payments made in the second year and the third year are substantially less than the payments made in the first year.
Good Luck!!!
March 14, 2014 at 7:10 pm #559049
JustWant 75Memberwow, i finished R1-R2 in Becker (Individual Taxation) and it doesn't cover Alimony Recap. Maybe it's covered in the later chapters but good to know, thanks for the info 🙂
Becker, Ninja Audio + Notes
FAR: 80 (Aug 2013)
AUD: 91 (Nov 2013)
BEC: 79 (Feb 2014)
REG: 80 (May 2014)March 14, 2014 at 7:34 pm #559050
TargetCPAParticipantMarch 15, 2014 at 1:52 am #559051
AnonymousInactiveI too am having a hard time staying focused. Just finished up the lecture for R6. Started the MCQ. Not much for simulations when you get into the Business Law sections. Something to look forward at least!
How's everyone else doing? I take my exam in two weeks. This weekend is full of new material for me. I need to get through R7 and R8 by Monday so that I can start doing my final review. Going to be a rough one!
Hang in there, guys!
March 15, 2014 at 1:52 am #559052
AnonymousInactiveI too am having a hard time staying focused. Just finished up the lecture for R6. Started the MCQ. Not much for simulations when you get into the Business Law sections. Something to look forward at least!
How's everyone else doing? I take my exam in two weeks. This weekend is full of new material for me. I need to get through R7 and R8 by Monday so that I can start doing my final review. Going to be a rough one!
Hang in there, guys!
March 15, 2014 at 2:03 pm #559053
LSNYCMemberJust applied for my NTS, hoping to take the exam April 21, but we will see how things go…. I need to focus if i don't pass i lose BEC and AUD and then lose FAR in September so i would basically be starting over…. I NEED to Pass tips welcome
A - 61, 91!!
B - 78!
F - 76!!!
R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!Finally done!
This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!
March 15, 2014 at 2:03 pm #559054
LSNYCMemberJust applied for my NTS, hoping to take the exam April 21, but we will see how things go…. I need to focus if i don't pass i lose BEC and AUD and then lose FAR in September so i would basically be starting over…. I NEED to Pass tips welcome
A - 61, 91!!
B - 78!
F - 76!!!
R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!Finally done!
This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!
March 15, 2014 at 2:29 pm #559055
NYCaccountantParticipant@LSNYC What are you having problems with the most?
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.March 15, 2014 at 2:43 pm #559056
LSNYCMemberHonestly i wish i know…. MY score reports are completely different every time.
I am planning on going over everything again this time, but focusing on tax, individual and coprs AMT. I think those are my weakest areas…
A - 61, 91!!
B - 78!
F - 76!!!
R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!Finally done!
This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!
March 15, 2014 at 4:02 pm #559057
kccpadudeMemberI'm on R4, and the Becker MCQs are going hard in the paint on like kind exchanges. It gives you a fact pattern, then you have to find 1) Realized Gain/Loss, 2) Recognized Gain/Loss, and 3) Basis of New Property Acquired.
I'm struggling a little with the basis calculation when boot is paid. In the book, the starting point for the basis calculation is always “FMV of property acquired,” but on the MCQs any time boot is paid, the starting point seems to be “adjusted basis of property given up.”
No where in the book does it use the adjusted basis of the property given up as the starting point for the new property's basis, so I'm wondering why they threw that in the MCQs. I have always arrived at the right answer by just using the FMV of the new property and subtracting any deferred gain and adding deferred losses, I'm just wondering why the MCQs seem to be adding confusion to the calculation.
AUD - 12/2/13 - 92
BEC - 2/21/14 - 93
REG - 4/11/14 - ??
FAR - 4/29/14 - ??March 16, 2014 at 2:36 am #559058
FinishorgiveupMember -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] REG Study Group 2014 - Page 10’ is closed to new replies.
