- This topic has 1,629 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 4 months ago by
OnMyWay732.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:33 pm #188294
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 1, 2014 at 6:40 pm #627808
JuliemiddleMemberOh, wow…I was looking at it completely wrong. Yes, $248k.
@CPA2014…I'm not sure what the question is on @Peterman's JE entry is but, basically, if you can figure out the calculation for reduction of Bond and Bond Issue Cost (which you did) the gain is always a “plug”, which is why I got the JE right in my calculation, but I still answered it wrong.
Not good for me 🙁 I'm so nervous about this exam – the amount of material is overwhelming.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 1, 2014 at 7:15 pm #627809
Peterman25ParticipantI know that I saw this asked somewhere, but I am having a hard time finding it….Do your exam SIMS have to be in exact order to be correct? Like when doing JEs?
I just did NINJA sim #17 and had 4 cells marked incorrectly because they weren't in the right place. They were technically correct, but didn't follow the solution JE exactly.
Please tell me that this is a NINJA sim quirk and not the way the real exam is.
BEC 7/14 - PASS
FAR 10/14 - PASS
AUD 1/15 - PASS
REG 4/15 - PASSAZ license - Official 8/20/2015
October 1, 2014 at 7:21 pm #627810
Peterman25Participanthttps://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/quick-farexam-in-general-question-on-sims
Nevermind…I found my answer..scary though
BEC 7/14 - PASS
FAR 10/14 - PASS
AUD 1/15 - PASS
REG 4/15 - PASSAZ license - Official 8/20/2015
October 1, 2014 at 8:16 pm #627811
AnonymousInactive@Julie If I were to have just done the JE for that problem, I would have picked the 247, because I would have added the 245 and the 2 and used that number (247). My question was, if we have a question like this and try to solve using the JE, would the correct way to do it be to add the gain of 3 + 245 to get the 248? Or is that just a coincidence in this case?
DR BP 250000
CR CASH 245000
CR BIC 2000
CR GAIN 3000
October 1, 2014 at 8:38 pm #627812
JuliemiddleMemberNo, it's no coincidence – the arithmetic has to add up. In the original example, the gain is found by calculating: $250k – $2k – $245k = $3k Gain. In your example, you're assuming that the gain/loss is already given and calculating it backwards.
So, if the problem stated there was a Loss of $3k (but didn't give you amounts for the Bond & BIC), you'd know the NET carrying value of the Bond is $242k.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 1, 2014 at 10:17 pm #627813
golfball7773ParticipantPare, Inc., purchased 10% of Tot Co.'s 100,000 outstanding shares of common stock on January 2, 20X1, for $50,000. On December 31, 20X1, Pare purchased an additional 20,000 shares of Tot for $150,000. There was no goodwill as a result of either acquisition, and Tot had not issued any additional stock during 20X1. Tot reported earnings of $300,000 for 20X1. What amount should Pare report in its December 31, 20X1, balance sheet as investment in Tot?
A.
$170,000
Incorrect B.
$200,000
C.
$230,000
D.
$290,000
Since Pare purchased the additional shares on December 31, Pare records only 10% of Tot's net income (for the 10% of the shares held during the year). However, because Pare owned a 30% share on December 31, the equity method is used, and the investment in Tot is adjusted for Pare's share of net income:
Pare's investment in Tot Co. on December 31, 20X1:
Acquisition cost of first 10,000 shares $ 50,000
Acquisition cost of additional 20,000 shares 150,000
Pare's share of Tot Co.'s 20X1 earnings
under equity method (10% x $300,000) 30,000
Total $230,000
My question is how do we determine that Pare's total share is now 30 percent?????
FAR: 63, 55, 62
REG: 65, 77*
AUD: Fail, 64, 71
BEC: 72, 74, 81*expired
October 1, 2014 at 11:29 pm #627814
AnonymousInactiveWell, just came back from taking the exam and the simulations were tough. I couldn't finish on time so I just put something real quick on one of them which is certainly going to get me zero points. I did put zero on all the boxes though LOL.
October 2, 2014 at 12:43 am #627817
AnonymousInactiveQuick question. When there is a change in deprecation method or change to LIFO i know that it is considered impractical to estimate rather than the norm of change in accounting principle, so do you officially label it change in estimate?
October 2, 2014 at 12:53 am #627818
AnonymousInactiveHi, can someone explain this question to me:
Able, Inc. had the following amounts of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, Year 1:
14 1/2% term note, due Year 2 3,000
11 1/8% term note, due Year 5 107,000
8% note, due in 11 equal annual principal payments, plus interest beginning December 31, Year 2 110,000
7% guaranteed debentures, due Year 6 100,000
Total 320,000
Able's annual sinking-fund requirement on the guaranteed debentures is
$4,000 per year. What amount should Able report as current maturities
of long-term debt in its December 31, Year 1, balance sheet?
a. $4,000
b. $7,000
c. $10,000
d. $13,000
Explanation
Rule: Current maturities of long-term debt in the balance sheet should include amounts due and payable within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
The $4,000 sinking-fund requirement would be disclosed in a footnote but is not included as a current maturity of long-term debt. Deposits into a bond sinking fund are an asset held by a trustee to repay the entire liability at maturity.
Choice “d” is correct. $13,000 current maturities of long-term debt at December 31, Year 1.
Thank you in advance!
October 2, 2014 at 12:55 am #627819
AnonymousInactiveDsteele, change to LIFO would be retrospective, while change from DDB to straight line would be prospective. Those are two different things, don't get them mixed up. But on these review programs like Wiley I believe they mark them down as change in acct estimate.
October 2, 2014 at 12:58 am #627820
AnonymousInactiveI'm guessing you are stuck on the interest part? It says 11 payments will be made with one on December 31 of 10,000 each (110/11). So you have accrued interest payable of 10,000 along with the term bond due in year two of 3,000.
October 2, 2014 at 1:03 am #627821
AnonymousInactive@CPAHOPEFUL11, Thank you!
That question wasn't so bad after all! Lol I think I've been studying too long for today
October 2, 2014 at 1:11 am #627822
AnonymousInactiveNp, that one was getting me as well.
October 2, 2014 at 1:35 am #627823
AnonymousInactive@CPAHopeful — How much time did you give yourself for the SIMS? I was thinking two hours….
October 2, 2014 at 1:45 am #627824
AnonymousInactiveI gave myself 2 hours and 5 minutes for the sims which should be more than enough time. However, the questions were pretty long and I got stuck on a few. I'm usually done with my FAR exam with an hour or close to an hour to go, but not this time around. I feel ticked about losing out completely on one of them but hopefully that one is the pretest one. It would be great if we could choose which one should be pretested LOL.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 34’ is closed to new replies.
