[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 334

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 4,996 through 5,010 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #565558
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If you realised the Gain then yes – its Income statement because its sold and so realised.

    So if they Sold Co X Shares – that means the Gain would be realised and therefore that 4,100 goes to the I/S

    Co Y – the increase in FV should got to OCI as not elected Fair Value option.

    Thats my thinking.

    #565559
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I was just reviewing marketable securities, I think the realized G/L for an AFS security is the difference between it's initial cost and the selling price. Whatever was accumulated in OCI is eliminated

    #565560
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yep, correct. For the AFS Security you would take the original cost and subtract the selling price to get the realized G/L. The AOCI would be eliminated through a debit if it was a gain, or a credit if it was a loss.

    for trading securities, it would be the adjusted cost less the selling price= realize G/L.

    Also, watch out in question when they say things like “purchased a long term investment”. That tends to throw me off but its how you determine whether or not to calculate the G/L for AFS vs Trading

    #565561
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The worst thing is transferring securities from one category to another

    #565562
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    ^^ Lol no freaking kidding. I hate that with a passion.

    Does anyone have a formula for calculating life insurance expense?

    #565563
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Premium Paid

    -Increase in CSV/ + decrease in CSV

    -Dividends Received

    Does that sound right?

    #565564
    stoleway
    Participant

    Sounds right..amanda

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #565565
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    Assets such as property taxes receivable associated with unavailable revenues such as property taxes collected more than 60 days after year end should be recorded by crediting :

    A. An increase non spendable fund balance

    B. A deferred Inflow of resources

    C. A deferred Outflow of resources

    D. An allowance

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #565566
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry Bit late – Yep you have it right.

    Oh ya that transferring business is a head spinner..

    #565567
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    B?

    #565568
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    C ?- Deferred Outflow

    Ehhh still don't like this subject

    #565569
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    Answer is B, but why? Shouldnt it be Deferred Outflow as they have been collected after 60 days…i dnt understand this?

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #565570
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hmmm – Ya Amanda – can you help explain why its B ? It would be nice if someone explained it.

    #565571
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    It would be a deferred inflow because it's an inflow to the company, not an outflow.

    #565572
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I sort of have been using it to help me through Govt Accounting stuff.

    “Assets – Deferred Outflows – Liabilities – Deferred Inflows”

    So I need to remember Its a Deferred Outlflow because it is going to be USE the assets

    In this Question monies coming in where not going to be used by the Assets and thats why its a Deferred Inflow?

Viewing 15 replies - 4,996 through 5,010 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 334’ is closed to new replies.