BEC Study Group January/February 2013 - Page 7

Viewing 15 replies - 91 through 105 (of 403 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #401358
    SeePeeAyy
    Member

    Can someone help me on a becker example? Im not sure if its a book error or I'm just not getting it.

    B2-17

    Example

    “The $10,000 factory floor supervisor salary is the only fixed cost that will be eliminated if Offset PURCHASES the part”.

    Why do they then use it under “make”? How does that make sense? If they purchase the part then they dont need the supervisor salary so why does that lower the “make” per unit cost since you are buying the part?

    #401359
    Meadows3030
    Member

    Is anyone else distressed by the amount of abstract nonsense business jargon used in BEC ?

    #401360
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So I feel like the dumbest person because I'm going through the Economic chapters and nothing is making sense to me (not to mention the lectures are really boring). Peter Olinto keeps yelling “don't memorize this, know the concepts”, but nothing is sticking. Any advice or tidbits?

    #401361
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Scheduled for 1/5.

    Starting B4 today. I plan to finish B4-B6 by Friday, and then start reviewing everything.

    #401362
    SeePeeAyy
    Member

    How are you guys keeping track of the variance analysis? I know its basic math but I feel like theres 15 equations to memorize.

    Finishing up B2 today, Got to be ready by 1/15 hope I'm not behind.

    Onto 132mcq testlet…..

    #401363
    SeePeeAyy
    Member

    Yes..B3 thank god. NPV, IRR, WACC all finance class stuff I smoked.

    Love this chapter, definitely a relief after the awful cost accounting stuff.

    #401364
    HopeCounter
    Participant

    @SeePeeAyy I took AUD before REG and didn't find it particularly helpful. As I begin BEC I am starting to think that perhaps I should have taken BEC after AUD, rather than REG, because a bunch of these topics (particularly IT-related) seems to be similar to AUD topics.

    AUD - 84 - 5/31/12 (lost credit), re-take 5/28/14
    REG - 83 - 12/7/12
    BEC - 80 - 2/27/13
    FAR - 69 - 11/30/13, 80 - 2/28/14

    #401365
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I like the lack of numerical problems in the IT chapter.

    #401366
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm taking BEC 02/20/13 and I'll start studying this week.

    I'll follow the same strategy I did for AUD. I watched the lectures and did the MCQs each week x 6 weeks per Becker. In the 4-6 week sections, I'll add in reading the NINJA notes on a daily basis. In the final 3 review weeks, I read the notes every day (often twice), rewrite them once, and do as many MCQ progress tests as I can.

    I seem to be spacing out the tests more than a lot of people but it works for me. I'm not the best at formalized tests and I don't want to underestimate any of the sections. Hopefully my AUD success will continue three more times.


    AUD – 11/19/12 – 99

    BEC – 02/20/13

    REG – 04/24/13

    FAR – 07/05/13

    Becker Self Study and NINJA Notes

    #401367
    Meadows30
    Participant

    how are you guys remembering all these formulas in b-1 and 2?

    Reg 11/26/2012 80
    BEC 01/05/2012
    Audit
    FAR

    #401368
    jackaroe
    Participant

    Missed by three in December. I am praying for many IT and COSO questions in January. I read a lot of texts but neglected practicing MCs. Guess I'll bury myself in MCs for the next month!!!

    #401369
    SeePeeAyy
    Member

    @3CPA You seem to have a very rigorous study plan man jeez haha. Now wonder you killed Audit.

    How do you get a 99 is that literally like 1-2MCQ wrong or what? Thats crazy.

    Man really struggling to sit down and do this, I just see 2:20:00 on a lecture and Im like no thanks.

    #401370
    Sudad
    Member

    99 is a perfect score! Impressive!

    DONE!!!

    #401371
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    SeePeeAyy

    I did not see anyone answer your question regarding BEC 2-17 example that you posted two days ago. I dont know if you figured it out but I though I wold try and help. I am new to this forum. When making a decision on whether a company should make or buy a component you should only consider all the variable costs & avoidable fixed costs to determine the company’s cost to make the product. These are the only relevant costs that need to be considered when making the decision. You do not include any costs that are fixed & unavoidable in the calculation for the company’s cost to make the product. According to the example the company has $10,000 in direct materials, $40,000 in direct labor, $20,000 in variable factory overhead, and $40,000 in fixed factory overhead. Fixed factory overhead includes $30,000 of unavoidable costs. You cannot eliminate these costs, whether you build the product internally or purchase it. Therefor they are not relevant to the decision and should not be included in the calculation in determining the cost to make the product. The $10,000 floor supervisor’s salary is an avoidable fixed cost (relevant to the decision) and should be included in calculation to determine the cost of making the product. The company’s relevant cost to make the product is $80,000 (10,000 D.M. + $40,000 D.L. + $20,000 Var. O.H. + $10,000 Avoidable Fixed Costs = $80,000). The cost to purchase the product is $100,000. The floor supervisor’s salary did not lower the “make” per unit cost, the unavoidable fixed costs did. I hope this helps. If it does not I’m sorry.

    #401372

    Night 1 of hitting the books again with BEC… 4 stupid points shy of passing the CPA Exam, would have been the best Christmas gift ever! Hoping to kill it in February so I can plan my wedding!

    REG - 72 (Oct 2011), 74 (May 2012), 80 (July 2012)
    FAR - 77 (Feb 2012)
    AUD - 70 (Aug 2012), 89! (Oct 2012)
    BEC - 71 (Dec 2012), 75!(Feb 2013)

Viewing 15 replies - 91 through 105 (of 403 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group January/February 2013 - Page 7’ is closed to new replies.