BEC Study Group January/February 2013 - Page 25

Viewing 15 replies - 361 through 375 (of 403 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #401628
    jeff
    Keymaster

    AUD - 79
    BEC - 80
    FAR - 76
    REG - 92
    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS)
    NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE | Another71
    #401629
    soxfan866
    Member

    Has anyone else taken the final exams in Becker 2013? I just took the first one and I recognized so many questions I had previously seen in the software. For FAR and AUD, I only recognized a few, but this time it was close to half. What a waste of time. I thought these were supposed to be new questions. Ah well.

    #401630
    frecklescpa
    Participant

    Any clarification to this Wiley Cost Measurement Problem is greatly appreciated. The answer for the first AND third parts don't make sense to me. You'll see when you read my comments in capitalized lettering. Here it goes:

    1. (a) Three computations must be performed: raw materials used, cost of goods manufactured, and cost of goods sold. (1) Raw materials purchased $ 430,000

    Less: Increase in raw materials inventory 15,000


    Raw materials used $ 415,000

    (2) Beginning WIP —

    Raw materials used (from above) $ 415,000

    Direct manufacturing labor 200,000

    Factory overhead 300,000


    Cost to account for $ 915,000

    Less: Ending WIP —


    Cost of goods manufactured $ 915,000

    (3) Cost of goods manufactured $ 915,000

    Add: Decrease in finished goods inventory 35,000


    Cost of goods sold $ 950,000

    PART 1 -The increase in raw materials inventory represents the amount of inventory that was purchased but was not used. Therefore, this increase must be subtracted from raw materials purchased to determine the amount of raw materials used.(OKAY- I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS INCREASE MUST BE SUBTRACTED FROM RAW MATERIALS PURCHASED-WHY OH WHY???? CAN SOMEONE SHOW ME A T-ACCOUNT ON THIS-MAYBE I'LL UNDERSTAND THIS.)

    PART 2 -Work in process inventory is an adjustment in arriving at cost of goods manufactured (as shown above). For this question no adjustment is necessary because Kay has no work in process inventory.(THIS MAKES SENSE-YEA!!)

    PART 3 -The decrease in finished goods inventory represents the amount of inventory that was sold in excess of the inventory manufactured during the current period. Therefore, this amount must be added to cost of goods manufactured to determine cost of goods sold. (OKAY- THIS EXPLANATION REALLY DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME. THE DECREASE IN FG REPRESENTS THE AMOUNT OF INVENTORY THAT WAS SOLD IN EXCESS OF THE INVENTORY MANUFACTURED DURING THE CURRENT PERIOD…???? WHAT DOES THIS MEAN???? AND WHY MUST IT BE ADDED TO CGM???) ANY HELP IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.

    The freight-out of $ 45,000 is irrelevant for this question

    #401631
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    frecklescpa, I know it is confusing. I wish I could take a picture of the T account for you. Hopefully, this helps a little. This is what Cindy from Yaeger Review said concerning this problem.

    Part 1 ) The increase in raw materials inventory of 15,000 means that you will have 15,000 more at the end of the year. Since it doesn't say anything about the beginning then the beginning is 0 and ending will be 15,000 = (0+15,000). So if Beginning is 0, add Purchases of 430,000, and subtract Ending of 15,000 then amount used is 415,000.

    Part 3 ) The decrease in finished goods inventory of 35,000 means that the ending will have 35,000 less then the beginning. This means the beginning is 35,000 and ending is 0. So if Beginning is 35,000, add COGM of 915,000, and subtract Ending of 0, then COGS is 950,000.

    #401632
    kts1010
    Member

    Two days to go to my test and am getting worried. I am scoring in the 80's on practice test which is worrying me I would like to see 90's at this point. I got work tomorrow but Friday off so that will be an all day cram session. I really hope in two days time it will all be over and I can just move on with my life.

    Here to everyone taking it before the close of the window!!

    AUD - 08/20/12 - 82
    REG - 10/30/12 - 82
    FAR - 01/05/13 - 80
    BEC - 04/15/13 - 84

    #401633
    frecklescpa
    Participant

    Carver7

    THANK YOU!!!

    I constructed the T account based on your explanation and it makes sense now.

    #401634
    no.cruncher
    Member

    This question seems real straight forward, though I've seen the sequence starting differently in regards to Real GDP through the Business Cycle Stages. Should be straight forward, but do not want to leave any doubts on something so simple, or that at least should be… Can anybody enlighten me please.

    Per my material the stage sequence are as follows:

    (Contraction) (Recession) Expansion Boom

    However, I've seen it where the sequence is:

    Boom Peak (Contraction) (Recession) Through Expansion Boom

    *** Maybe I'm over-thinking this, and maybe should just make sure that the sequence itself makes sense as opposed to the starting point?

    FAR - 7/16/2012 *76 : 2.5mo [Exp. 1/2014]
    AUD - 8/31/2012 *82 : 1mo
    REG - 11/27/2012 *83 : 2.5mo
    BEC - 2/27/2013 *80 : 2.5mo LET'S DO THIS!!!
    Ethics - 3/13

    [ 2011 Kaplan Self Study - Textbook, MP3s, FlashCards ]

    CMA... Hmmm...???

    #401635
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @no.cruncher, I just think you need to know the definitions and sequence. It is too easy in BEC to over think stuff.

    The economy constantly goes up and down. When the economy is going up and reaches its Peak (the very top of the cycle) then it will start to go down. If the economy is going down and reaches its Trough (the very bottom of the cycle) then it will start to go up. Going up can be referred to as Recovery or Expansion (Boom). Going down can be referred to as Recession or Contraction.

    #401636
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @kts1010, don't worry about the practice tests scores; they are not a good representation of the real test. Take Friday evening off from studying and relax to let everything absorb into your brain. You will do good.

    #401637
    kappa1032
    Participant

    Can you guys let me know if this is crazy?

    I'm taking FAR on May 6th and scheduling BEC on May 30th. I can't postpone them any further. Is 24 days way too short to prepare for BEC? I can try to make my FAR date a week earlier, but I'd rather not since it's a doozy of a test.

    FAR - 81
    REG - 74, 87
    AUD - 88
    BEC - 88

    Finally.

    “The only guarantee for failure is to stop trying”
    ― John C. Maxwell

    #401638
    no.cruncher
    Member

    @Carver7, thanks, just really stressing this one trying to make it my last!

    Oh and on another note, I totally AGREE on not worrying about practice tests, as the real deal is way easier, if you get the overall concepts, or at least it has been the case for the my last 3, but BEC has me a bit worried. Not sure if it's the anxiety of just wanting to be done or all the difficulty many are having with it 🙁

    FAR - 7/16/2012 *76 : 2.5mo [Exp. 1/2014]
    AUD - 8/31/2012 *82 : 1mo
    REG - 11/27/2012 *83 : 2.5mo
    BEC - 2/27/2013 *80 : 2.5mo LET'S DO THIS!!!
    Ethics - 3/13

    [ 2011 Kaplan Self Study - Textbook, MP3s, FlashCards ]

    CMA... Hmmm...???

    #401639
    kts1010
    Member

    Thanks guys, I feel like most of the ones I get wrong are just stupid mistakes or conceptual ones I get confused on. Hopefully with an 8 or so hour study session tomorrow I will be good to go. Man do I wan this all to be over which is making this test that much crazier.

    AUD - 08/20/12 - 82
    REG - 10/30/12 - 82
    FAR - 01/05/13 - 80
    BEC - 04/15/13 - 84

    #401640

    @kappa1032 – I'd say your going to have to study about 25 hrs a week in order to feel well prepared for taking BEC at the end of May. Since you can't push it, what do you have to lose?! the ~$225 you paid to register… and what's $225 in the whole scheme of this cpa exam process. You might as well take it, see how you do and if you don't pass, you'll learn from your areas of weakness and where you need to improve. Best of luck!!

    REG - 72 (Oct 2011), 74 (May 2012), 80 (July 2012)
    FAR - 77 (Feb 2012)
    AUD - 70 (Aug 2012), 89! (Oct 2012)
    BEC - 71 (Dec 2012), 75!(Feb 2013)

    #401641
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    For those who passed the BEC, do you mind share if WC status must be “comparable” in order to be pass? Many thanks!!

    #401642
    no.cruncher
    Member

    Here's a perfect example of what I fear on the exam, or can someone clarify where I'm not getting this super straight forward Inflation Rate Calculation:

    Q: “If the Consumer Price Index rises during the year from 176 to 179.5, the rate of inflation during the year is?

    a. 1.1%

    b. 1.9%

    c. 2.0%

    d. answer cannot be determined from the information provided

    A. c. 2.0% !

    Yet my calculation = Inflation Rate = ( End CPI – Beg CPI ) / Beg CPI = ( 179.5 – 176 ) / 176 = 0.01988 ~ 1.9% It did not say anything about rounding, so I figured like all Accounting, be conservative, WRONG!

    FAR - 7/16/2012 *76 : 2.5mo [Exp. 1/2014]
    AUD - 8/31/2012 *82 : 1mo
    REG - 11/27/2012 *83 : 2.5mo
    BEC - 2/27/2013 *80 : 2.5mo LET'S DO THIS!!!
    Ethics - 3/13

    [ 2011 Kaplan Self Study - Textbook, MP3s, FlashCards ]

    CMA... Hmmm...???

Viewing 15 replies - 361 through 375 (of 403 total)
  • The topic ‘BEC Study Group January/February 2013 - Page 25’ is closed to new replies.