AUD Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 36

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #836134
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q4 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for AUD.

    If this is your first post in the study group – please post your target exam date (just the time frame to preserve your anonymity), and your past history with this exam (optional, of course).

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 526 through 540 (of 1,087 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1314692
    ahsq
    Participant

    quick question:

    which financial statement assertion is violated when an expense occuring in one year is not recorded until the following year?

    a accuracy
    b classification
    c completeness
    d occurrence

    I picked d. for the existence/occurrence assertion.

    #1314719
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think completeness. The question is telling you that the expense occurred, so it definitely exists. It just has not been completed by being recorded in the period it was supposed to.

    #1314739
    TheblackCPAseeker
    Participant

    @Forem004 AND @ ahsq
    It is B

    The only reason you trace from purchase order (Source document) to Purchase journal (Book) is to make sure the purchases were recorded correctly.

    FAR - 80 (05/2015)

    AUD - 68 (08/2015, Retake (07/03/16)

    REG - 77 (11/2015)

    BEC - Sometime in 2016

    We are destined for this.

    #1314749
    TheblackCPAseeker
    Participant

    @ahsq for your questions the answer is completeness (since it deals with the whether all transactions and events are recorded or not).

    In my opinion the more appropriate assertion would have been cutoff but since that wasn't an option, completeness is the closest to the right answer.

    FAR - 80 (05/2015)

    AUD - 68 (08/2015, Retake (07/03/16)

    REG - 77 (11/2015)

    BEC - Sometime in 2016

    We are destined for this.

    #1314752
    GiniC
    Participant

    @ahsq – I had to dig around a bit, but I agree with Dr Cash A Milli that it's completeness. This site Accounting tools – assertions helped me…

    #1314794
    ahsq
    Participant

    thanks all, here is another:

    Of the following, which is the most efficient audit procedure for verification of interest earned on bond investments?

    Tracing interest declarations to an independent record book.

    Recomputing interest earned.

    Confirming interest rate with the issuer of the bonds.

    Vouching the receipt and deposit of interest checks.

    >>>>>>>>> I picked confirming (substantive test) rate with issuers.

    #1314853
    TheblackCPAseeker
    Participant

    @ahsq

    I have looked around and all my sources say its: Recomputing interest earned.

    I don't know how it is more efficient but I'm looking for the explains right now.

    FAR - 80 (05/2015)

    AUD - 68 (08/2015, Retake (07/03/16)

    REG - 77 (11/2015)

    BEC - Sometime in 2016

    We are destined for this.

    #1314859
    GiniC
    Participant

    @ahsq – on the verification of interest earned question – process of elimination works best for this one:

    Tracing interest declarations to an independent record book – this only verifies interest if you are certain that the independent book (which you haven't audited) is correct, and what independent record book would exist for this? Finding one sounds like extra effort (therefore not very efficient)

    Confirming interest rate with the issuer of the bonds – this tells you the rate(s) but not the interest earned, so you still have to recompute

    Vouching the receipt and deposit of interest checks – only verifies what was received, not that it was correct

    This leaves Recomputing interest earned – since you have the original bond/loan documentation you can recompute the interest and reconcile it to the recorded interest earned and perhaps to those vouched checks.

    #1314898
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    anyone know if Roger practice exams actually grade TBS? I got a 88% on a practice and left all the TBS blank lol

    #1314901
    Forem004
    Participant

    For th research questions for this section, if I have Au-c 315.27a, which is the section Vs paragraph?

    #1314917
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    315 section 27a para

    #1314989
    user2701
    Participant

    Difficulty in understanding chapter-Audit Sampling.

    As I am unable to grasp, I feel ROGER is running too fast in this chapter.. ha ha ha

    Any idea..how to have a hold on this chapter ?

    BEC- 43(Feb'16), Retake-June 10, (Wiley text book/WQB/NINJA MCQ)
    REG- TBD
    FAR- TBD
    AUD- TBD

    #1315009
    ahsq
    Participant

    thanks all, heres another:

    During the first part of the current fiscal year, the client company began dealing with certain customers on a consignment basis. Which of the following audit procedures is least likely to bring this new fact to the auditor’s attention?

    Tracing of shipping documents to the sales journal.

    Test of cash receipts transactions.

    Confirmation of accounts receivable.

    Observation of physical inventory.

    >>>>i chose confirmation of AR.

    #1315019
    Sticky Nicky
    Participant

    id say observation of physical inventory

    #1315030
    ahsq
    Participant

    i seriously have a problem with these audit procedures. am i so f&(*ing stupid or what??

Viewing 15 replies - 526 through 540 (of 1,087 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q4 2016 - Page 36’ is closed to new replies.