EVERYONE DOING BEC! - Page 2

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #829532
    AMGcpa
    Participant

    So it sounds like everyone is getting blind-sided with IT/COSO!?

    Does that mean people aren’t getting much computation problems? I am dreading getting those questions. My exam is Thursday and I can’t stand trying to memorize all of these long formulas!

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 43 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #829577
    Porma Fierles
    Participant

    Wait, so if IT is impossible but one of us gets an IT heavy exam, what the heck are we supposed to do?

    "Fearlessly shape-shifting, to pass this exam!" "STRIVE FOR 85"

    BEC-PASSED!, September 6
    AUD-PASSED!, November 3
    REG retake-March 4
    FAR retake-Spring 2017

    #829579
    Ryan
    Participant

    AMG.. It was a joke of an exam. The IT questions were not in Ninja or CPAExcel. Probably not becker either. I thought after getting a few they would stop and were just pretest, but they kept coming!!! 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, my IT exam never stopped!

    AUD - 93
    BEC - 85
    FAR - 85
    REG - 85
     
    #829580
    Ryan
    Participant

    Porma…nothing you can do. Just guess and move on. I had 11 IT/COSO questions IN A ROW on my 2nd testlet that I flagged.

    AUD - 93
    BEC - 85
    FAR - 85
    REG - 85
     
    #829581
    AMGcpa
    Participant

    @Ryan hahahahaha you have me dying over here at my dinner table while studying. I'm hoping I don't get that exam! At least not the hard IT stuff. Because I'm wishing I don't get any computational!

    #829584
    Porma Fierles
    Participant

    That sucks, there is seemingly no way to plan or prepare for said IT questions.

    "Fearlessly shape-shifting, to pass this exam!" "STRIVE FOR 85"

    BEC-PASSED!, September 6
    AUD-PASSED!, November 3
    REG retake-March 4
    FAR retake-Spring 2017

    #829585
    Ryan
    Participant

    I want questions that make me apply the knowlege I have. Not obscure questions about IT terms that no one has ever heard of

    AUD - 93
    BEC - 85
    FAR - 85
    REG - 85
     
    #829587
    Porma Fierles
    Participant

    Why is it IT/COSO? Aren't those two separate topics?

    "Fearlessly shape-shifting, to pass this exam!" "STRIVE FOR 85"

    BEC-PASSED!, September 6
    AUD-PASSED!, November 3
    REG retake-March 4
    FAR retake-Spring 2017

    #829589
    .
    Participant

    I'm not going to worry about this too much, especially seeing as how all the review courses seem to be doing a miserable job of preparing people for the IT topic.

    Lots of people were saying half their sims on AUD were from FAR but mine were all definitely related to auditing. I get the feeling the people that said that think anything with a journal entry should be in FAR and not AUD.

    FAR- 88- 6/16- (Ninja Avg. 74%)
    REG- 89- 7/16- (Ninja Avg. 77%)
    AUD- 95- 8/16- (Ninja Avg. 81%)
    BEC- 82- 9/16- (Ninja Avg. 75%)
    [Wiley CPAExcel + Ninja MCQ]

    Finally licensed.

    FAR - June 2016 - 88
    REG - July 2016 - 89
    AUD - Aug 2016 - review phase currently
    BEC - Sep 2016 -

    Wiley CPA Excel & Ninja MCQ

    #829630
    mtaylo24
    Participant

    I think this one is my favorite:

    A company is evaluating two investment proposals. Project A costs $700,000 and Project B costs $500,000. Expected cash inflows for the two projects are as follows:

    Cash Inflow Cash Inflow
    At End of Year: At End of Year:
    Year Project A Project B
    —- ————— —————
    1 $400,000 $250,000
    2 $300,000 $250,000
    3 $600,000 $250,000

    Both projects are assessed as being equally risky and having an appropriate cost of capital of 10%.

    For a 10% cost of capital, the following present value factors apply:

    Number Present Value of Present Value of an Annuity of
    of $1 Received at $1 Received at End of Each Year
    Years End of Year N (PVIF) for N Years (PVIFA)
    —— ——————– ——————————-
    1 .9091 .9091
    2 .8264 1.7355
    3 .7513 2.4873

    For a 3-year annuity, the following present value factors apply:

    Discount Present Value of a 3-Year
    Rate Annuity of $1 (PVIFA)
    ——– ————————-
    16% 2.2459
    20% 2.1065
    24% 1.9813
    28% 1.8684

    Which of the following most closely approximates the internal rate of return of Project B?
    A. 16%
    B. 20%
    Correct C. 24%
    D. 28%

    ANSWER

    The internal rate of return is the discount rate that sets the net present value of a project equal to zero. At a discount rate of 24%, the net present value of Project B is:

    – $500,000 + $250,000 (PVIFA (3 years, 24%)) = – $500,000 + $250,000 (1.9813) = $4,675

    Of the discount rates given, this one most closely approximates the internal rate of return on Project B.

    At a discount rate of 16%, the net present value of Project B is:

    -$500,000 + $250,000 (PVIFA (3 years, 16%))
    = -$500,000 + $250,000 (2.2459)
    = $61,475

    This is not as close to zero as the net present value calculated at a 24% discount rate.

    At a discount rate of 20%, the net present value of Project B is:

    -$500,000 + $250,000 (PVIFA (3 years, 20%))
    = -$500,000 + $250,000 (2.1065) = $ 26,625

    This is not as close to zero as the net present value calculated at a 24% discount rate.

    At a discount rate of 28%, the net present value of Project B is:

    -$500,000 + $250,000 (PVIFA (3 years, 28%))
    = -$500,000 + $250,000 (1.8684)
    = -$32,900

    This is not as close to zero as the net present value calculated at a 24% discount rate.

    CPA (2017)

    REG:  75

    BEC:  76

    FAR:  77

    AUD: 78

     

    CMA (2019)

    P1: 380

    P2: 360

    AUD - 1st - 60 (12/12), 61 (2/13), 61 (8/13), 78! (11/15)
    REG - 55 (2/16) 69 (5/16) Retake(8/16)
    BEC - 71(5/16) Retake (9/16)
    FAR - (8/16)

    #829632
    .
    Participant

    I got that one right….somehow….not the way they did it though. I saw the answer and was like WOAH!! Screw that, man, I'm not wasting my precious time reading that crap.

    FAR- 88- 6/16- (Ninja Avg. 74%)
    REG- 89- 7/16- (Ninja Avg. 77%)
    AUD- 95- 8/16- (Ninja Avg. 81%)
    BEC- 82- 9/16- (Ninja Avg. 75%)
    [Wiley CPAExcel + Ninja MCQ]

    Finally licensed.

    FAR - June 2016 - 88
    REG - July 2016 - 89
    AUD - Aug 2016 - review phase currently
    BEC - Sep 2016 -

    Wiley CPA Excel & Ninja MCQ

    #829634
    c1oth
    Participant

    I skipped it. You think questions are that long on BEC?

    #829651
    Pete E. Rino
    Participant

    I am hoping for calculations. From what I been hearing with IT questions never seen with review courses, I don't need to be seeing a plethora of those if I want to pass. IT is bad enough even after doing them who knows how many times. I have done like 600 unique IT questions (this is ignoring how many I have re-done to get them right) and I still can't wrap my head around it.

    #829652
    Pete E. Rino
    Participant

    I am taking it on Wednesday and I am hoping for calculations. From what I been hearing with IT questions never seen with review courses, I don't need to be seeing a plethora of those if I want to pass. IT is bad enough even after doing them who knows how many times. I have done like 600 unique IT questions (this is ignoring how many I have re-done to get them right) and I still can't wrap my head around it.

    #829658
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Becker Mix-up – Page B4-26

    What a mess!
    Plan & Organize or Process & Organize??

    If Becker is that confused, how much more could I be with BEC, especially with IT?

    #829757
    Finally_a_CPA
    Participant

    AMGcpa & mtaylo24: I'm right there with you two. My exam is on Thursday. I wish I could have checked the forum before. I'm seeing all these comments about COSO/IT being heavily tested. I'm honestly nervous because those are probably my two weakest sections. I don't believe in miracles but I'm hoping for one on Thursday. It would just mean so much!!

    AUD - 75
    BEC - 78
    FAR - 81
    REG - 92
    "If you study, you will pass" - Roger
Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 43 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.