REG Study Group Q3 2016 - Page 5

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 315 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #784660
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    the annual exclusion is $14k per person, per year. when a husband and wife agree to split gifts, they treat it like half the gift is from each of them, and they can exclude $28k (per person, per year).

    so, i think it's A because each gift is under $28k.

    or $24k in this question. i think it's from a previous year? annual exclusion is $14k now

    #784661
    jad11
    Participant

    Answer B assumes that their total exclusion is $12,000 for the year per spouse for a total of $24,000. That is wrong. Their exclusion is $24,000 x 2 gifts = $48,000. You have to remember that the exclusion is $12,000 per gift and per spouse, and they are giving a gift to 2 people. Also, like Dr. Cash mentioned, the exclusion now is 14,000 per gift.

    #784662
    .
    Participant

    I saw this one recently and got it wrong. The annual exclusion $14,000 per DONEE, not donor. So the wife gets $14,000 for the gift to the niece and another $14,000 for the gift to the daughter & the husband gets the same.

    FAR - June 2016 - 88
    REG - July 2016 - 89
    AUD - Aug 2016 - review phase currently
    BEC - Sep 2016 -

    Wiley CPA Excel & Ninja MCQ

    #784663
    Tncincy
    Participant

    So the answer should be 0 taxable. The current annual exclusion is 14,000 but the question gives 12,000 as the annual. so use the 12,000 given.

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #784664
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    also, as far as i understand it, the lifetime exclusion, aka “unified credit” aka “unified estate and gift credit” is the aggregate of the gifts you've given above the annual exclusion over the course of your life + the value of your estate when you die. anything over $5.45 million is subject to estate taxes

    #784665
    PeiChieh Tsai
    Participant

    I have a question about Reg simulation #36:

    Tulinsky Corp., is a calendar-year accrual-basis corporation that commenced operations on November 1, Year 4. The following adjusted accounts appear on Tulinsky's records for the year ended December 31, Year 5. Tulinsky is not subject to the uniform capitalization rules.

    COSTS AND EXPENSES
    Cost of goods sold $4,350,000
    Salaries and wages 1,220,000
    Depreciation:

    Real property 50,000

    Personal property 100,000
    Bad debt (1) 20,000
    State franchise tax 25,000
    Vacation expense 10,000
    Interest expense (2) 16,000
    Employee health insurance coverage 19,000
    Organizational costs (3) 50,000
    Donated property (4)
    Federal income taxes 200,000
    Other expenses (5) 29,000

    (1) Bad Debt: Represents the increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts based on an aging of accounts receivable. Actual bad debts written off were $8,000.

    (2) Interest expenses on:

    Mortgage loan: $12,000
    Loan obtained to purchase municipal bonds: $1,000
    Line of credit loan: $3,000
    (3) Organizational costs of $50,000 were spent in Year 4. Tulinsky made the election to deduct these costs.

    (4) Tulinsky donated a parcel of unimproved land to a qualified charity. The property was acquired in Year 1 at a cost of $15,000 and at the time of the donation had an FMV of $250,000.

    (5) Start-up costs of $60,000 were spent in Year 4. Tulinsky began operation on November 1, Year 4. The company made the election to deduct the start-up costs.

    An abbreviated deduction section for Form 1120 is provided below for the Tulinsky Corporation. The total income for Tulinsky Corporation is $2,600,000. Fill in the appropriate dollar amounts (i.e., no cents are recorded) for each of the shaded cells appearing in the form. If the value of a cell is zero, you must enter a zero (“0”) to receive credit for your answer.

    ========================
    My question is, the solution calculates the charitable contribution without considering the cost of good sold because COGS wasn't included in the partial 1120 form. It doesn't seem correct to me.

    In reality the charitable contribution should be calculated using ATI, so if sale minus COGS is a negative number, aka we are in a NOL position, we won't be able to make any charitable contribution. Is that correct?

    #784666
    csvirk
    Participant

    Does the recipient of Cash gift include the proceeds in his/her income for tax purpose?

    FAR: 71, 77!
    AUD: 69, 80
    BEC: 72
    REG: 84

    #784667
    kpanna92
    Participant

    @csvirk no, the recipient excludes it from their income for tax purposes

    FAR: 81
    AUD: 72, 71, 87 finally!
    BEC: 79
    REG:

    #784668
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    If a CPA acts unprofessionally who should be contacted? I'm wondering if it's the IRS, AICPA, State board of accountancy or PCAOB? Or maybe something else. Maybe the state board because they can revoke their license? In REG 5 it mentions the SEC can revoke accountants right to practice if they act unprofessionally, but this doesn't address the question of who to contact.

    #784669
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @PeiChieh Tsai, i just tried that question (and spent way too long trying to figure it out haha). here's what i found out:

    check out form 1120, line 11 “Total Income” — it already takes into account CoGS. it's actually your Gross Profit + dividends, interest, rent, royalties, and cap gains.

    #784670
    Tncincy
    Participant

    @DMB: if those are the options, then the state board of Accountancy would be my choice. This is about ethics and professional responsibility.

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #784671
    CPAdestined11
    Participant

    Ok, so I get that where it is per Donee not donor, I miss-read the question, Let me ask this then say they gave each person 26K and using the 12K exclusion in this problem, would they have to pay a total of 4K gift tax during the year then since they went over? Or does that go against their liftetime exclusion as well, file the form no taxes paid.

    #784672
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    they would have to report the $4k over the annual exclusion on the gift tax form 709 and it would count towards their lifetime exemption. they still wouldn't have to pay taxes until they went over $5.45mm (including their estate)

    #784673
    Claudia408
    Participant

    If you get one DRS SIM, does that mean it's the pretest?

    BEC - 75 (3x)
    AUD - 78 (3x)
    REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
    FAR - 54, Sept 8

    #784674
    CPAdestined11
    Participant

    Thanks Docta. So basically whenever I get a gift tax question and it states nothing about them being over the lifetime exclusion, how much do they pay taxes on the answer is 0? If they have hit the lifetime exclusion, are they paying taxes on the whole thing or just how much over per the years proper exclusion? You have to report no matter what the amount is though correct? Or just if you go over the yearly allowance?

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 315 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q3 2016 - Page 5’ is closed to new replies.