- This topic has 315 replies, 65 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 3 months ago by
mtaylo24.
-
CreatorTopic
-
July 2, 2016 at 9:54 pm #203374
-
AuthorReplies
-
July 6, 2016 at 3:14 am #784660
AnonymousInactivethe annual exclusion is $14k per person, per year. when a husband and wife agree to split gifts, they treat it like half the gift is from each of them, and they can exclude $28k (per person, per year).
so, i think it's A because each gift is under $28k.
or $24k in this question. i think it's from a previous year? annual exclusion is $14k now
July 6, 2016 at 3:20 am #784661
jad11ParticipantAnswer B assumes that their total exclusion is $12,000 for the year per spouse for a total of $24,000. That is wrong. Their exclusion is $24,000 x 2 gifts = $48,000. You have to remember that the exclusion is $12,000 per gift and per spouse, and they are giving a gift to 2 people. Also, like Dr. Cash mentioned, the exclusion now is 14,000 per gift.
July 6, 2016 at 3:30 am #784662
sancasukiParticipantI saw this one recently and got it wrong. The annual exclusion $14,000 per DONEE, not donor. So the wife gets $14,000 for the gift to the niece and another $14,000 for the gift to the daughter & the husband gets the same.
July 6, 2016 at 3:34 am #784663
TncincyParticipantSo the answer should be 0 taxable. The current annual exclusion is 14,000 but the question gives 12,000 as the annual. so use the 12,000 given.
It begins with a 75
Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to passJuly 6, 2016 at 3:39 am #784664
AnonymousInactivealso, as far as i understand it, the lifetime exclusion, aka “unified credit” aka “unified estate and gift credit” is the aggregate of the gifts you've given above the annual exclusion over the course of your life + the value of your estate when you die. anything over $5.45 million is subject to estate taxes
July 6, 2016 at 6:45 am #784665
PeiChieh TsaiParticipantI have a question about Reg simulation #36:
Tulinsky Corp., is a calendar-year accrual-basis corporation that commenced operations on November 1, Year 4. The following adjusted accounts appear on Tulinsky's records for the year ended December 31, Year 5. Tulinsky is not subject to the uniform capitalization rules.
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Cost of goods sold $4,350,000
Salaries and wages 1,220,000
Depreciation:Real property 50,000
Personal property 100,000
Bad debt (1) 20,000
State franchise tax 25,000
Vacation expense 10,000
Interest expense (2) 16,000
Employee health insurance coverage 19,000
Organizational costs (3) 50,000
Donated property (4)
Federal income taxes 200,000
Other expenses (5) 29,000(1) Bad Debt: Represents the increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts based on an aging of accounts receivable. Actual bad debts written off were $8,000.
(2) Interest expenses on:
Mortgage loan: $12,000
Loan obtained to purchase municipal bonds: $1,000
Line of credit loan: $3,000
(3) Organizational costs of $50,000 were spent in Year 4. Tulinsky made the election to deduct these costs.(4) Tulinsky donated a parcel of unimproved land to a qualified charity. The property was acquired in Year 1 at a cost of $15,000 and at the time of the donation had an FMV of $250,000.
(5) Start-up costs of $60,000 were spent in Year 4. Tulinsky began operation on November 1, Year 4. The company made the election to deduct the start-up costs.
An abbreviated deduction section for Form 1120 is provided below for the Tulinsky Corporation. The total income for Tulinsky Corporation is $2,600,000. Fill in the appropriate dollar amounts (i.e., no cents are recorded) for each of the shaded cells appearing in the form. If the value of a cell is zero, you must enter a zero (“0”) to receive credit for your answer.
========================
My question is, the solution calculates the charitable contribution without considering the cost of good sold because COGS wasn't included in the partial 1120 form. It doesn't seem correct to me.In reality the charitable contribution should be calculated using ATI, so if sale minus COGS is a negative number, aka we are in a NOL position, we won't be able to make any charitable contribution. Is that correct?
July 6, 2016 at 1:19 pm #784666
csvirkParticipantDoes the recipient of Cash gift include the proceeds in his/her income for tax purpose?
FAR: 71, 77!
AUD: 69, 80
BEC: 72
REG: 84July 6, 2016 at 2:55 pm #784667
kpanna92Participant@csvirk no, the recipient excludes it from their income for tax purposes
FAR: 81
AUD: 72, 71, 87 finally!
BEC: 79
REG:July 6, 2016 at 3:11 pm #784668
AnonymousInactiveIf a CPA acts unprofessionally who should be contacted? I'm wondering if it's the IRS, AICPA, State board of accountancy or PCAOB? Or maybe something else. Maybe the state board because they can revoke their license? In REG 5 it mentions the SEC can revoke accountants right to practice if they act unprofessionally, but this doesn't address the question of who to contact.
July 6, 2016 at 3:20 pm #784669
AnonymousInactive@PeiChieh Tsai, i just tried that question (and spent way too long trying to figure it out haha). here's what i found out:
check out form 1120, line 11 “Total Income” — it already takes into account CoGS. it's actually your Gross Profit + dividends, interest, rent, royalties, and cap gains.
July 6, 2016 at 3:26 pm #784670
TncincyParticipant@DMB: if those are the options, then the state board of Accountancy would be my choice. This is about ethics and professional responsibility.
It begins with a 75
Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to passJuly 6, 2016 at 3:40 pm #784671
CPAdestined11ParticipantOk, so I get that where it is per Donee not donor, I miss-read the question, Let me ask this then say they gave each person 26K and using the 12K exclusion in this problem, would they have to pay a total of 4K gift tax during the year then since they went over? Or does that go against their liftetime exclusion as well, file the form no taxes paid.
July 6, 2016 at 3:49 pm #784672
AnonymousInactivethey would have to report the $4k over the annual exclusion on the gift tax form 709 and it would count towards their lifetime exemption. they still wouldn't have to pay taxes until they went over $5.45mm (including their estate)
July 6, 2016 at 3:53 pm #784673
Claudia408ParticipantIf you get one DRS SIM, does that mean it's the pretest?
BEC - 75 (3x)
AUD - 78 (3x)
REG - 67, 66, Aug 1
FAR - 54, Sept 8July 6, 2016 at 4:00 pm #784674
CPAdestined11ParticipantThanks Docta. So basically whenever I get a gift tax question and it states nothing about them being over the lifetime exclusion, how much do they pay taxes on the answer is 0? If they have hit the lifetime exclusion, are they paying taxes on the whole thing or just how much over per the years proper exclusion? You have to report no matter what the amount is though correct? Or just if you go over the yearly allowance?
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q3 2016 - Page 5’ is closed to new replies.
