REG Study Group Q3 2016 - Page 20

Viewing 15 replies - 286 through 300 (of 315 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #826111
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    @cultur3 The rule is that taxable income cannot exceed the exemption. So in both of your examples I would say no, he is not dependent based on this rule.

    #826135
    cultur3
    Participant

    @ pyacpa49 thank you!

    F 83 4/09/16
    A 85 6/10/16
    B 81 7/19/16

    #826297
    pyacpa49
    Participant

    Well, tomorrow's the day. Good luck to anyone else taking it this quarter. Hopefully we don't see each other in the Q4 thread. Let's do this!!

    #827074
    A1lessio
    Participant

    good luck everyone. Decided to move my exam to Oct 17th, two days after busy season. Working full time and trying to cram it all in before the 7th caused me to nearly burn out.

    AUD - 86
    BEC - 70
    FAR - 78
    REG - 84
    People who subject themselves to the strictest discipline, who give up certain pleasurable things in order to obtain a goal are the happiest of men.

    AUD (08/02/2016)

    #827092
    Spartans92
    Participant

    A lot of questions in becker are asking from book to taxable income and I understand the concept and are getting the questions right. But what if it had asked the opposite from tax to book.. here is an example. This is the original.
    Cape Co. reported book income of $140,000. Included in that amount was $50,000 for meals and entertainment expense and $40,000 for federal income tax expense. In Cape's Schedule M-1 of Form 1120, which reconciles book income and taxable income, what amount should be reported as taxable income?

    instead, if it said Cape Co. reported taxable income of $140,000. Included in that amount was $50,000 for meals and entertainment expense and $40,000 for federal income tax expense. In Cape's Schedule M-1 of Form 1120, which reconciles book income and taxable income, what amount should be reported as book income? Would it be 230k?

    BEC - 76
    REG- 67, 85
    AUD-63, 74, 80!!
    FAR-65, 62, 57, 79

    3 down 1 more to go. BEC is on the Line 🙁

    BEC- PASS

    #827308
    So FAR So Good
    Participant

    @A1lessio – I think I'm in the same boat as you. Have my exam scheduled for 10/8, but I'm really feeling the pressure right now, and after R-1 and R-2 I'm experiencing a bit of brain drain.

    Can someone give me their opinion on skipping around a bit in Becker's REG chapters? I'm so burned out from R-1 and R-2 that I'm considering slipping in the R-5 professional ethics lecture just to break things up in the tax section. Is this a bad idea? Is there anything in that section that I'd find more clarity in by doing R-3 and R-4 first?

    AUD - 91
    BEC - 85
    FAR - 91
    REG - 86
    .

    F - 91 (6/5/2016)
    A - 7/30/2016
    R - 10/8/2016
    B - 12/10/2016

    #827317
    Paydirt123
    Participant

    So FAR So Good: You know what they say about opinions right, lol. Anyway, my own two cents, do what you want. I personally used a similar approach with FAR and it worked out for me. Everyone's different, but do what you want, no reason for you to not learn the material because you want in different chapter order, IMHO

    AUD - 84
    BEC - 80
    FAR - 80
    REG - 85
    Took the long way, but I got there
    #828157
    livealittle
    Participant

    can anyone explain the difference in c and d?

    The fair value for an asset or liability is measured as:
    a. The appraised value of the asset or liability.
    b. The cost of the asset less any accumulated depreciation or the carrying value of the liability on the date of the sale.
    c. The price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
    d. The price that would be received when selling an asset or paid when transferring a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.

    BEC - 8/8/16
    REG - 66, 77
    AUD - 81
    FAR - 9/8/16

    #828181
    Paydirt123
    Participant

    liveslittle: entrance vs exit price

    AUD - 84
    BEC - 80
    FAR - 80
    REG - 85
    Took the long way, but I got there
    #829363
    A1lessio
    Participant

    So Far So Good – Yeah definitely skip around if you need a break from tax. I really enjoyed chapters 1-5 because it applies to work. I'm really struggling on the blaw. Maybe because I am not taking it seriously.

    AUD - 86
    BEC - 70
    FAR - 78
    REG - 84
    People who subject themselves to the strictest discipline, who give up certain pleasurable things in order to obtain a goal are the happiest of men.

    AUD (08/02/2016)

    #829479

    Hey I need a little help with this question i dont understand where the 10k is coming from (correct answer is C 10K):
    Paul Pappas owns all of the stock of an S corporation which had previously been a C corporation. The S corporation had the following balances at the beginning of its tax year:

    Accumulated adjustments account $ 8,000
    Accumulated earnings and profits 10,000
    Paul's stock basis was $20,000 at the beginning of the tax year. The S corporation made a distribution of $19,000 to Paul during the year. What amount of the distribution is taxable to Paul?

    Incorrect A.
    $0

    B.
    $8,000

    C.
    $10,000

    D.
    $18,000

    BEC 70, 86
    AUD 55, 77
    REG 67, 71, 75
    FAR 54, 66, 76
    Done!!!
    #829629
    Paydirt123
    Participant

    Don'tmakemeaudityourass: I'm confused myself. “What amount of the distribution is taxable to Paul?” I would think the entire $19k distribution would be taxable to Paul, the lone shareholder who received it? That's not even an answer choice? Are you sure the question isn't: “what part of the distribution is taxable to the corporation?” In that case, $10k is correct, as the S corp has accumulated E&P from when it was a C Corp, an exception for S Corps being taxed

    AUD - 84
    BEC - 80
    FAR - 80
    REG - 85
    Took the long way, but I got there
    #829684
    melody_pinaycpa
    Participant

    @dontmakeme – For S corporations, distributions from Accumulated E & P or Current E & P are taxable but will not reduce the basis. Had the question asks for basis, it would be 11K. Basically, 10K distributions from A E & P are taxable but will not reduce basis while 9K is tax free distribution from AAA that will reduce basis and remaining 1K is a tax free return of capital to the extent of basis.

    FAR - 88
    AUD - 86
    BEC - 82
    REG - 73, 70, 82

    FAR (Apr 2015) - 88
    AUD (July 2015) - 86
    BEC (Oct 2015) - 82
    REG - 73, 70, retake Sept 2016

    #829722

    Thanks!!

    BEC 70, 86
    AUD 55, 77
    REG 67, 71, 75
    FAR 54, 66, 76
    Done!!!
    #829941
    Madam Secretary
    Participant

    Is SOX no longer included in REG exam? if not why becker still has those mcq?

    AUD - 78
    BEC - NINJA in Training
    FAR - NINJA in Training
    REG - 77
    "I can't take the easy way out. I don't need to invoke anything but the truth".
Viewing 15 replies - 286 through 300 (of 315 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.