- This topic has 315 replies, 65 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 5 months ago by
mtaylo24.
-
CreatorTopic
-
July 2, 2016 at 9:54 pm #203374
jeff
KeymasterWelcome to the Q3 2016 CPA Exam Study Group for REG.
Some BLITZ videos to help your exams: https://www.another71.com/ninja-blitz
-
AuthorReplies
-
July 3, 2016 at 1:48 am #784600
Just3Letters
ParticipantOff to rest for a couple hours and then wake up to get at this thing!
I'll update you guys tomorrow!
FAR- 81
REG- 81
BEC- Aug 22, 2016
AUD- TBDJuly 3, 2016 at 2:04 am #784601Spartans92
ParticipantBest of luck, mate! I believe you will destroy REG.
BEC- PASS
July 3, 2016 at 2:09 am #784602CPA2BEE
ParticipantGo get em @Just3! You got this!
FAR - 80
AUD - 82
BEC - 80
REG - 85ETHICS - 90
EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016July 3, 2016 at 3:08 am #784603Anonymous
InactiveBest of luck, hope it goes well. 🙂
July 3, 2016 at 3:33 am #784604Spartans92
ParticipantA heavy equipment dealer would like to trade some business assets in a nontaxable exchange. Which of the following exchanges would qualify as nontaxable?
a.
A road grader held in inventory for another road grader.
b.
Investment securities for antiques to be held as investments.
c.
A corporate office building for a vacant lot.
d.
The company jet for a large truck to be used in the corporation.Answer: C. I dont get why heavy equipment is considered realty property? Thought it would be personal. My initial thought was D. Per explanation: The exchange of a corporate office building for a vacant lot qualifies for like-kind nonrecognition treatment. It is the exchange of realty for realty of property used in the trade or business or held for investment.
BEC- PASS
July 3, 2016 at 3:51 am #784605Anonymous
InactiveThe nature of the heavy equipment dealership business is irrelevant here. It could be a cosmetic business or milk business. The focus should be on the two items being compared in the selections. Letter c pertains to a corporate building and vacant lot being exchanged. They are both realty properties used in the trade or business. The rest are investments against real properties and one is company jet (not used for trade or business) against a large truck, thus they are non-like-kind exchanges.
July 3, 2016 at 5:07 am #784606jad11
ParticipantI don't think that the fact that the company is a heavy equipment dealer has anything to do with the answer in this case. It just so happens that they chose the dealer in this example, but the could have very well chosen a company in any other industry. The like-kind exchange focus is just to distinguish whether you have qualifying property and whether the nature of the property is the same and we are told that the corporate office and the vacant lot are realty. I really can't distinguish why the jet and large truck fall under “different nature,” that is just one of those things that I memorized after doing the problem.
July 3, 2016 at 1:42 pm #784607Josh
ParticipantHiya, Ninjas! Am I spending too much time”practicing simulations”? I've done 13 sets of 6-7 (7 when they give me DRS); If I do 7 more to follow my review, that's potentially 7 hours too much? that's like a day or 2 of studying.. I'm a week behind my review. At that rate, I'll have a week to review when I believe I need more time focused on the final review? I still have several sets of MCQ's before I approach the sim. for non-corporate business structures. I don't know if it's better to ask this question in another forum, but we're about to go out of town for the 4th of July, and I was about to stay home instead and study because I'm behind schedule. I hear you can't really “practice simulations.” That and I've probably spent too much time trying to learn my material from doing them. What do you think?
July 3, 2016 at 2:04 pm #784608Anonymous
Inactivemost real estate is like-kind to other real estate, unless it's in another country. so a building would be like-kind to land
personal property is much more restrictive. a car would not even be like-kind to a truck.
and inventory, stock, and securities are specifically excluded
July 3, 2016 at 3:31 pm #784609Spartans92
ParticipantOhh.. I totally get what the question is saying now. Thanks guys! I first misunderstood it. Guess I wasn't getting “the call of the question.” Have a wonderful holiday for those in the US!
BEC- PASS
July 3, 2016 at 4:10 pm #784610.
ParticipantMike Smith received $10,000 (consisting of $6,000 principal and $4,000 interest) when he redeemed a Series EE savings bond in Year 6. The bond was issued in his name in Year 1 and the proceeds were used to pay for Mike's 21-year-old daughter's college tuition. Mike had not elected to report the yearly increases in the value of the bond. Mike must include what amount in gross income for Year 6 as a result of the bond redemption?
A.
$0Correct B.
$4,000C.
$6,000D.
$10,000A cash-basis taxpayer, unless he elects otherwise, is required to report the total increment in value of noninterest-bearing U.S. savings bonds issued at a discount (i.e., Series E and EE) at the time the bonds are surrendered. Thus, the increment in value from the date of purchase to the date of surrender at or before maturity is to be reported as income when the bond is surrendered.
As a result, when Mike redeems the Series EE bond, $4,000 in interest is taxable.
The exclusion for U.S. Savings Bond Income Used for Higher Education (IRC Section 135) does not apply for this question because the bonds must be qualified U.S. Savings Bonds issued after 1989 to an individual who has reached age 24 before the date of issuance.
Why is this not zero? According to Wiley:
Interest on series EE savings bonds can be excluded at maturity or when redeemed if the taxpayer uses the proceeds to pay higher education expenses in the year of redemption.
1. The exclusion is available if the owner of the bond is at least 24 years old (the bond must not be held in a child's name).
2. The interest is excluded in proportion to the educational expenses (tuition and fees) of the taxpayer, spouse, or dependent that are not reimbursed by scholarships.
FAR - June 2016 - 88
REG - July 2016 - 89
AUD - Aug 2016 - review phase currently
BEC - Sep 2016 -Wiley CPA Excel & Ninja MCQ
July 3, 2016 at 5:15 pm #784611Anonymous
InactiveWell the bond was issued in Year 1, and according to the explanation, the exclusion is only available to EE Bonds issued after Year 1989
Haha I have no idea really
July 3, 2016 at 5:16 pm #784612CPA2BEE
ParticipantIs it because the daughter is 21 and not yet 24?
FAR - 80
AUD - 82
BEC - 80
REG - 85ETHICS - 90
EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016July 3, 2016 at 5:16 pm #784613CPA2BEE
Participanthahahah @Dr Cash I'm with you
FAR - 80
AUD - 82
BEC - 80
REG - 85ETHICS - 90
EXPERIENCE - COMPLETE
Application for California license mailed 8/4/2016July 3, 2016 at 6:49 pm #784614Spartans92
ParticipantSands purchased 100 shares of Eastern Corp. stock for $18,000 on April 1 of the prior year. On February 1 of the current year, Sands sold 50 shares of Eastern for $7,000. Fifteen days later, Sands purchased 25 shares of Eastern for $3,750. What is the amount of Sand's recognized gain or loss?
Can someone please explain how the basis of the 25 shares is calculated. Becker's explanation just didnt click for me. I get $1000 is recognized because total 2k was loss but only half of the stock was repurchased so half was disallowed.. correct?
Becker stated: the 25 shares repurchased on 2/16/X2 has a basis of $4,750 ($190/share). Can someone show the math? Thanks.
Second Question:
Hogan exchanged a business-use machine having an original cost of $100,000 and accumulated depreciation of $30,000 for business-use equipment owned by Baker having a fair market value of $80,000 plus $1,000 cash. Baker assumed a $2,000 outstanding debt on the machine. What taxable gain should Hogan recognize?Had this question asked realized gain instead.. would the answer be 13000 but 10,000 is deferred. 3k is recognized. Just wanna make sure I'm understanding the concept. Thanks.
BEC- PASS
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q3 2016’ is closed to new replies.