REG Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 40

Viewing 15 replies - 586 through 600 (of 1,005 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #415406

    bwt, I just viewed Peter's explanation for that page and sure enough, he does try to drill down that “Gov. only”. Perhaps he meant that only government may ask for: divestiture, injunction, dissolution or cease & desist orders. Well, if that what he meant, then it is a true statement. And, individuals may ask only for triple damages (treble) and attorneys' fees. Both can sue but for different things.

    Becker Class of Jan - Aug 2013: FARB DONE!!!!
    CPA license pending 🙂

    #415407
    wendywhite
    Member

    CPAExam2013

    Partnership question:

    Are they agents & do they have a fiduciary duty:

    A partnership creates a fiduciary relationship between partners because being a partner means you are an agent for both the partnership & for the partners.

    Partnership law draws heavily on agency law because each partner is an agent and also a principal.

    FAR 11/2012: 80
    AUD 2/19/2013: 90
    REG 5/14/2013: 76
    BEC 11/2013: 85
    Ethics: 100
    Waiting on the packet....

    #415408
    wendywhite
    Member

    audiox – we'll be taking the test on the same day – you'll have a freak out stress buddy!

    FAR 11/2012: 80
    AUD 2/19/2013: 90
    REG 5/14/2013: 76
    BEC 11/2013: 85
    Ethics: 100
    Waiting on the packet....

    #415409
    wendywhite
    Member

    delete – dup post

    FAR 11/2012: 80
    AUD 2/19/2013: 90
    REG 5/14/2013: 76
    BEC 11/2013: 85
    Ethics: 100
    Waiting on the packet....

    #415410
    wendywhite
    Member

    LSNYC

    I recommend doing the free questions online from the cpareview for free – and if you want – also buying the $10 of sims.

    I also recommend going through the aicpa released tests – older and newer.

    and finally – anything you find difficult & challenging – restudying that

    FAR 11/2012: 80
    AUD 2/19/2013: 90
    REG 5/14/2013: 76
    BEC 11/2013: 85
    Ethics: 100
    Waiting on the packet....

    #415411
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    SeattleAccountant. Thanks, what gets me is that on page R8-61 Peter circles Private Action and says it is unique to Sherman. I guess he could be saying a “civil suit” by a private party is unique to Sherman and reiterates that on page 64. As for private parties under Robinson-Patman they can only sue for damages but not bring a civil suit…I know im being very anal about this, but when I took BEC i had a question where I was unclear due to Becker's explanations and got it wrong..

    #415412
    wendywhite
    Member

    regarding who can sue & the types of suits –

    https://www.ftc.gov/bc/antitrust/factsheets/antitrustlawsguide.pdf

    States Sherman can be criminal or civil.

    Found a more detailed explanation:

    https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/robinson_patman_act.html (scroll to the last section)

    FAR 11/2012: 80
    AUD 2/19/2013: 90
    REG 5/14/2013: 76
    BEC 11/2013: 85
    Ethics: 100
    Waiting on the packet....

    #415413
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks a lot Wendy, I'm just going to go with Clayton & RP can be brought by private parties for treble damages as well, except no criminal.

    #415414
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Ok, got my hands on a 5 hour energy. Whee! I should have done this weeks ago!

    Finished chapter 6, including notes, going to do a progress test now. I need to have all chapters done by next weekend so I'll have two weeks for review. I'd have liked to have longer, perhaps I can get the chapters done sooner…not sure yet.

    #415415
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Wendy

    haha, it's my last part so I'm definitely anxious to pass

    Reworking all the MC now and marking the ones I get wrong. Then I'll practice the marked ones.

    #415416
    wendywhite
    Member

    good for you – I can't wait until I can say “its my last!”

    FAR 11/2012: 80
    AUD 2/19/2013: 90
    REG 5/14/2013: 76
    BEC 11/2013: 85
    Ethics: 100
    Waiting on the packet....

    #415417
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Same here.. although I might regret saving the best for last (FAR).

    #415418
    TAJCPA
    Participant

    R3 is killing me…I can't seem to get off of it… I wanted to be done with chapter 3 today. I am tired!

    #415419
    LSNYC
    Member

    Thanks Wendy!

    I am struggling with motivation today I just can not get in to study mode!!

    A - 61, 91!!
    B - 78!
    F - 76!!!
    R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!

    Finally done!

    This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!

    #415420
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Just took the SOB…I think that the MCQs went really well and I felt that the testlets got progressively harder (that's a good sign). BUTTTTTTT the Sims really beat me up and I got a research question that I could not find. Nothing I can do now but pray for a 75! On to FAR in July.

    Good luck to everyone else attempting this exam this window!

Viewing 15 replies - 586 through 600 (of 1,005 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 40’ is closed to new replies.