- This topic has 1,005 replies, 131 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 7 months ago by
SeattleAccountant.
-
CreatorTopic
-
March 1, 2013 at 5:20 pm #176448
jeffKeymasterResources:
REG 10 Point Combo: https://www.another71.com/products-page/ten-point-combo
REG Exam Experience: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-forum/topic/reg-exam-experience-official-thread
-
AuthorReplies
-
April 27, 2013 at 6:48 am #415406
SeattleAccountantMemberbwt, I just viewed Peter's explanation for that page and sure enough, he does try to drill down that “Gov. only”. Perhaps he meant that only government may ask for: divestiture, injunction, dissolution or cease & desist orders. Well, if that what he meant, then it is a true statement. And, individuals may ask only for triple damages (treble) and attorneys' fees. Both can sue but for different things.
Becker Class of Jan - Aug 2013: FARB DONE!!!!
CPA license pending 🙂April 27, 2013 at 1:21 pm #415407
wendywhiteMemberCPAExam2013
Partnership question:
Are they agents & do they have a fiduciary duty:
A partnership creates a fiduciary relationship between partners because being a partner means you are an agent for both the partnership & for the partners.
Partnership law draws heavily on agency law because each partner is an agent and also a principal.
FAR 11/2012: 80
AUD 2/19/2013: 90
REG 5/14/2013: 76
BEC 11/2013: 85
Ethics: 100
Waiting on the packet....April 27, 2013 at 1:23 pm #415408
wendywhiteMemberaudiox – we'll be taking the test on the same day – you'll have a freak out stress buddy!
FAR 11/2012: 80
AUD 2/19/2013: 90
REG 5/14/2013: 76
BEC 11/2013: 85
Ethics: 100
Waiting on the packet....April 27, 2013 at 1:23 pm #415409
wendywhiteMemberdelete – dup post
FAR 11/2012: 80
AUD 2/19/2013: 90
REG 5/14/2013: 76
BEC 11/2013: 85
Ethics: 100
Waiting on the packet....April 27, 2013 at 1:33 pm #415410
wendywhiteMemberLSNYC
I recommend doing the free questions online from the cpareview for free – and if you want – also buying the $10 of sims.
I also recommend going through the aicpa released tests – older and newer.
and finally – anything you find difficult & challenging – restudying that
FAR 11/2012: 80
AUD 2/19/2013: 90
REG 5/14/2013: 76
BEC 11/2013: 85
Ethics: 100
Waiting on the packet....April 27, 2013 at 3:15 pm #415411
AnonymousInactiveSeattleAccountant. Thanks, what gets me is that on page R8-61 Peter circles Private Action and says it is unique to Sherman. I guess he could be saying a “civil suit” by a private party is unique to Sherman and reiterates that on page 64. As for private parties under Robinson-Patman they can only sue for damages but not bring a civil suit…I know im being very anal about this, but when I took BEC i had a question where I was unclear due to Becker's explanations and got it wrong..
April 27, 2013 at 3:52 pm #415412
wendywhiteMemberregarding who can sue & the types of suits –
https://www.ftc.gov/bc/antitrust/factsheets/antitrustlawsguide.pdf
States Sherman can be criminal or civil.
Found a more detailed explanation:
https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/the_101_201_practice_series/robinson_patman_act.html (scroll to the last section)
FAR 11/2012: 80
AUD 2/19/2013: 90
REG 5/14/2013: 76
BEC 11/2013: 85
Ethics: 100
Waiting on the packet....April 27, 2013 at 4:21 pm #415413
AnonymousInactiveThanks a lot Wendy, I'm just going to go with Clayton & RP can be brought by private parties for treble damages as well, except no criminal.
April 27, 2013 at 7:35 pm #415414
AnonymousInactiveOk, got my hands on a 5 hour energy. Whee! I should have done this weeks ago!
Finished chapter 6, including notes, going to do a progress test now. I need to have all chapters done by next weekend so I'll have two weeks for review. I'd have liked to have longer, perhaps I can get the chapters done sooner…not sure yet.
April 27, 2013 at 8:03 pm #415415
AnonymousInactivehaha, it's my last part so I'm definitely anxious to pass
Reworking all the MC now and marking the ones I get wrong. Then I'll practice the marked ones.
April 27, 2013 at 8:11 pm #415416
wendywhiteMembergood for you – I can't wait until I can say “its my last!”
FAR 11/2012: 80
AUD 2/19/2013: 90
REG 5/14/2013: 76
BEC 11/2013: 85
Ethics: 100
Waiting on the packet....April 27, 2013 at 8:24 pm #415417
AnonymousInactiveSame here.. although I might regret saving the best for last (FAR).
April 27, 2013 at 9:16 pm #415418
TAJCPAParticipantR3 is killing me…I can't seem to get off of it… I wanted to be done with chapter 3 today. I am tired!
April 27, 2013 at 9:56 pm #415419
LSNYCMemberThanks Wendy!
I am struggling with motivation today I just can not get in to study mode!!
A - 61, 91!!
B - 78!
F - 76!!!
R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!Finally done!
This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!
April 27, 2013 at 11:56 pm #415420
AnonymousInactiveJust took the SOB…I think that the MCQs went really well and I felt that the testlets got progressively harder (that's a good sign). BUTTTTTTT the Sims really beat me up and I got a research question that I could not find. Nothing I can do now but pray for a 75! On to FAR in July.
Good luck to everyone else attempting this exam this window!
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 40’ is closed to new replies.
