REG Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 19

Viewing 15 replies - 271 through 285 (of 1,005 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #415091
    terranz
    Member

    sorry for 2 posts – wish i could edit my original

    forgot to add, one of the issues i've found is that bc im trying to cover as much as possible, i start memorizing mcq's it seems. I still go read each answer as if i've never seen it before, and perform any calcs where applicable. just following the ninja way of continuous mcqs. thought about getting the wiley test bank, but i don't know if i'll do it justice. i figure if you can truly understand/firm grasp of 90% or so of beckers 1394 questions, you should be in pretty good shape right??

    thanks again

    #415092
    LSNYC
    Member

    SMP – Congrats! That's great news and a HUGE motivator!

    terranz – I think 4 weeks is doable if you are putting in the time (which is seems you are). If you feel you are really understanding the topics and scoring 80+ i think you are ready. But make sure you are actually understanding the topics not just memorizing. If you feel like you are memorizing (which you said you may be) i say get the Wiley test bank some of the questions are the same but a lot are different it will help to make sure you understand the topics. You can also try cpareviewforfree.com . Is this your first exam?

    I am trying for 1-2 hours tonight. I am exhausted from work this week and next week are really busy for me with Q 1 closing. Tomorrow should be the same, Saturday and Sunday I am going to try for 4 hours each day.

    Happy studying!

    A - 61, 91!!
    B - 78!
    F - 76!!!
    R - 71, 73, 74, 69, 77!!!!

    Finally done!

    This is my 2nd attempt at the exam, I had two parts passed (failed many) and I stupidly quit, big mistake. Now I'm back and with a vengeance!

    #415093
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I suppose since I read this daily, I should try “checking in.” Exam is scheduled one week from tomorrow, have re-read the notes twice, done all the MCQ's at least 3 times, and copious Progress Tests averaging between 90-99%. I seem to have a firm understanding of the material but still worry I might get those few questions that I don't know. Any tips on further review without buying another CPA review program?

    #415094
    smp73
    Member

    Checking in for the night: Finished rewriting the NINJA notes tonight (needed a break from MC!) Going to do crazy MC this weekend, re read notes, and I want to rewrite notes one more time. Oh and practice sims this weekend.

    The performance review was exactly what I needed…after failing REG by one point I was feeling fairly discouraged in general so it was a huge pick me up and my boss is going to nominate me for a pretty big leadership development program! Very excited about that too. 🙂

    I keep telling myself…just keep swimming. We can do this!

    NYS CPA License # 113563
    CIA: Done as of 2/15/14

    Training for a half marathon post studying!

    #415095

    Done with Corporate taxation! yeay, finally on to R-4: Partnerships, estates & trusts.

    Becker Class of Jan - Aug 2013: FARB DONE!!!!
    CPA license pending 🙂

    #415096
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Good morning! I took a practice test last night, 30 questions, and got an 86%. (Still a bit of trouble with the property exchanges and not getting AMT, yet. I'll circle back around to those later.)

    I'm on a mission today, totally stoked about Becker chapter 3. Hopefully Tim is still “blazing” in this one…

    Ok, BBL! 🙂

    #415097
    foxcroftdr
    Member

    This is a problem regarding AMT add back adjustment in computing in AMTI in wiley which i am not able to understand. Here is the problem

    On Joint tax return, sam and joan AGI=$150,000 and claimed following itemized deductions:

    Interest of $15K on a $100K home equity loan to purchase a motor home

    Real Estate tax and state income taxes of $18 K

    Unreimbursed medical expense of $15K(prior to AGI limitation)

    Miscellanous itemized deductions of $5K(prior to AGI limitation)

    Based on these deductions, what would be the amount of AMT add-back adjustment in computing alternative minimum taxable income?

    a. $21750

    b. $23750

    c. $35000

    d. $38750

    Wiley says, the correct answer is d.

    I am having doubts regarding the Unreimbursed medical expense. According to me, there would be no AMT deduction for medical expense because they do exceed 10% AGI. But they seem to have added $3750. Any ideas for this?

    #415098
    Mel
    Participant

    I am trying to stay focused for my retake on April 15th but i'm struggling!! So far i've managed to listen to Ninja audio everyday at work, read them 1 and half times so far and do 20-50 MCQs at work everyday. The last 2 weekends have been a total bust. i still have time to pull it together though just need some motivation. I plan on finishing rewriting the ninja notes maybe by the end of next week and doing tons of MCQs between now and the 15th. Hoping i can get back on track this weekend. Hope all your studies are going well!

    #415099
    gobias
    Member

    Holy heck the R7 optional MCQ's are kicking my ass. I seriously hate bankruptcy and secured transactions.

    @foxcroftdr I believe the add back is for the difference between 7.5% and 10% of AGI. Under AMT, you can only deduct medical expenses in excess of 10% of AGI, so you add back the difference between that and the normal deduction of 7.5% excess (which is $3750).

    F - 86
    R - 90
    A - 97
    B - 91

    #415100
    MCLKT
    Participant

    Just went over the AMT review and I second gobias' explanation.

    🙂

    Corp. Tax or Date???

    I'm trying to decide whether to go on a date tonight or stay home and study… The thing is, even if I go on a date tonight, I'm not going to be available again for like a month. I might as well ask for a dating extension, and maybe go out after my exams, lol.

    A:[73]97 F:[74]85 R:86 B:[74]82
    *NINJA 10 Pt. COMBO & Yaeger*

    #415101
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi guys I have a question that really bothers me.

    Shouldnt the basis be 10,000. 16,000-6000(25% of 24000)

    Help would be greatly appreciated.

    Strom acquired a 25 percent interest in Ace Partnership by contributing land having an adjusted basis of $16,000 and a fair market value of $50,000. The land was subject to a $24,000 mortgage, which was assumed by Ace. No other liabilities existed at the time of the contribution. What was Strom's basis in Ace?

    a.$0

    b.$16,000

    c.$26,000

    d.$32,000

    Explanation

    Choice “a” is correct. Strom's basis in the land ($16,000) carries over as an element of his basis in Ace. The assumption by Ace of Strom's liabilities on the land ($24,000) is treated as a distribution of money to Strom, which reduces his basis temporarily to negative $8,000. Then, through his status as a partner of Ace, Strom is treated as re-assuming 25% of the liability, or $6,000, and this increases his basis temporarily to negative $2,000. Since it is impossible to have negative basis, Strom realizes a gain (usually capital) of $2,000, the amount necessary to bring his basis up to zero.

    Choice “b” is incorrect. Strom's basis in Ace is reduced because of the liability assumed by Ace.

    Choice “c” is incorrect. Strom's basis in the land ($16,000) carries over as an element of Strom's basis in Ace.

    Choice “d” is incorrect. Strom's basis in the land ($16,000) carries over as an element of Strom's basis in Ace. Then, Strom's basis in Ace is reduced because of the liability assumed by Ace.

    #415102
    gobias
    Member

    You deduct $18000 from the old basis ($16k) because he is a 25% partner. That means the partnership is assuming 75% of the debt ($18k). Basis is reduced by the partnership's assumption of debt on the contributed asset. That brings it down to $-2k and since you can't start with a negative basis, Strom recognizes a gain which brings it up to 0.

    @MCLKT you still have 1.5 months before your test. I say go have fun 🙂

    F - 86
    R - 90
    A - 97
    B - 91

    #415103
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Does anyone else find the language in the R4 estate/trust MCQs to be very tricky? I feel like several of them are genuine “trick questions.”

    #415104
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks gobias You explained it better than Becker lol

    And YES! chefblake glad to see i am not the only one.

    #415105
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi! I'm new here. Good luck to all of us!

    I'm re-taking REG on 5 April, already feel these butterflies in stomach 🙁

    Getting 80-86 on Becker progress tests, however can't score more than 70 on GLEIM online tests((

    I heard that GLEIM is much difficult than BECKER, I hope this is true….

    Any ideas how to excel on research type questions? I really have difficulty in them(((

Viewing 15 replies - 271 through 285 (of 1,005 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group April/May 2013 - Page 19’ is closed to new replies.