[jeff]

I just checked mine for MA – still error score not found. Nothing yet

[pearljam10]

Bec and audit entails reading and rewatching lectures. For audit i would do the multiple choice questions. For bec I would just do the multiple choice questions for 3,4,5. You could skip four if u want I did bc it is memorization.

[2BORNOT2B]

bfarb…I would agree with that…I was done with auditing with about an hour left…FARE…1 minute 10 seconds left and was rushing the entire time

[Anonymous]

My issue w/FAR was the SIMS, each tab was extremely long just to read the scenario. Let alone do the problem

[pearljam10]

Only for regs u would lose points for guessing. One case scenario

[Anonymous]

You don't lose points for guessing. I'm lost as to why you think that? Far as I know on the CPA exam you start off w/a score of 0 and add to it. Its not like the SAT where you lose points for wrong answers

[pearljam10]

Bec is about protecting against a theory based test. That is the goal. Therefore, you read and read. If you dont like reading just keep rewatching the lectures. Bec for yaeger and becker are okay. They both have strengths and flaws. I personally did not like any of them. I rate it like 5 or 6 for both. Becker for regs 9-10 audit becker 9-10

Yaeger 10 for far. Becker 6 for far. However, some of beckers lectures are better than yaegers. Pensions and governmental and not for profit

[FARSUXCPA]

Would the loophole work now for FAR?

Is any one able to re-register?

DONE!

[pearljam10]

What helped with my exam was the college I went 2. They never told me what was going to be on the test. It would be 2 exams. 1-7 and 8 -14. I strruggled through my schooling at pace university. i believe my gpa was way under 3. I went to dowling and my gpa was a 3.3 for accounting classes. Today, college education is watered down. They tell you what exactly is on the exam. That does not help for this test.

[2BORNOT2B]

I can't beleive that it is this quiet … somebody at the AICPA is dropping the ball

[jllocke]

FARSUXCPA- The loophole only works if AICPA released FAR to NASBA. We don't know if that happened yesterday. (I don't think it did). But we don't know, I shouldn't be such a pessimist!

AUD-69,72 Retake April 2011
BEC-67,69 Retake May 2011
FAR-58,70 Retake (02/28/11)
REG-68 Retake (01/14/11)

[Anonymous]

Bigmones, SIMs were also a problem for me as well. I agree with whomever said that the time allocation for FAR is way too short.

[pearljam10]

It might be a good sign if they have far right now. i think they have either regs or far

[jllocke]

Way too short on the time for FAR! I barely touched the second sim, did the WC and one tab. All others blank. :-/

AUD-69,72 Retake April 2011
BEC-67,69 Retake May 2011
FAR-58,70 Retake (02/28/11)
REG-68 Retake (01/14/11)

[jllocke]

pearjam10, what's a good sign? I am lost.

AUD-69,72 Retake April 2011
BEC-67,69 Retake May 2011
FAR-58,70 Retake (02/28/11)
REG-68 Retake (01/14/11)

[pearljam10]

I would think the loophole is a good sign right now. However, we dont know if they released regs or far. I think NASBA has one of them and should be updating the system as we speak. They have been doing things differently in this current window. Meaning, they tweet and post just like they did for bec. I think they did the same for audit.

The loophole however might not be valid at this point though. Who knows. Good luck

[Author]

Replies