- This topic has 1,629 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
OnMyWay732.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:33 pm #188294
-
AuthorReplies
-
November 18, 2014 at 1:47 am #628534
Determined CPAParticipantsalring – thank you again!! I forgot to refer to OWNS – I dream of mnemonics and this one slipped my mind!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.November 18, 2014 at 1:50 am #628535
salringParticipantNo problem anytime I hope I will remember during my exam on the 26th
November 18, 2014 at 1:53 am #628536
Determined CPAParticipantYou will!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.November 18, 2014 at 2:56 am #628537
GabeParticipantNovember 18, 2014 at 3:01 am #628538
GabeParticipantVadis Co. sells appliances that include a 3-year warranty. Service calls under the warranty are performed by an independent mechanic under a contract with Vadis. Based on experience, warranty costs are estimated at $30 for each machine sold. When should Vadis recognize these warranty costs?
A.
Evenly over the life of the warranty
B.
When the service calls are performed
C.
When payments are made to the mechanic
D.
When the machines are sold
Normally I would say “A” is correct..but the answer is D. Is this because the repairs are not done by Vadis Co., but a contractor?
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016November 18, 2014 at 3:22 am #628539
Future NinjaParticipant@Gabe im at 62% average. test this Friday.
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,November 18, 2014 at 3:23 am #628540
mccaberpMemberSee the link I've attached. It will all make sense
https://www.accountingtools.com/warranty-accounting
AUD: Pass
REG: Pass
BEC: Pass
FAR: PassFirst try CPA. Thank god. God bless America.
November 18, 2014 at 3:31 am #628541
MehwishMemberAs a result of differences between depreciation for financial reporting purposes and tax purposes, the financial reporting basis of Noor Co.'s sole depreciable asset, acquired in 20X1, exceeded its tax basis by $250,000 at December 31, 20X1. The difference will reverse in future years. The enacted tax rate is 30% for 20X1 and 40% for future years. Noor has no other temporary differences. In its December 31, 20X1, balance sheet, how should Noor report the deferred tax effect of this difference?
The answer is $100,000 liability
I thought if the book expense was greater now, and taxed later…than its an asset.
I saw the flip side of this where the tax depr. expense was greater than the book, and it was also a liability.
Can some clairfy this?
JE for this:
Tax Expense
DTL
November 18, 2014 at 3:33 am #628542
SsbknycMember@mccaberp, thanks for the link…makes sense because of the matching principle, matching expenses against revenues for that certain product sale
Done 08/2014-08/2015
November 18, 2014 at 3:43 am #628543
GabeParticipant@Future awesome! I'm at 63% test on Saturday…look forward to your experience.
@mcca there was another question about warranties where you recognize the expense over the life of the warranty…I can't recall specifics. Do you know what would cause that difference? (Thanks for the link 🙂 )
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016November 18, 2014 at 3:47 am #628544
GabeParticipant@meh I used to know the answer…I really did. But I always just assume depreciation is a DTL.
https://smallbusiness.chron.com/causes-deferred-tax-liability-55653.html
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016November 18, 2014 at 4:03 am #628545
Future NinjaParticipant@gabe sure thing. i'll post mine right away.
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,November 18, 2014 at 4:25 am #628546
mccaberpMemberTake your time in reading the question and try and understand it. This was one of my biggest problems studying for all of these tests. I even inserted a flash card into my deck that would say “RTFQ” to remind me of the importance of this.
The depreciable asset for tax purposes is $250,000 less than the basis for financial purposes. This means that the asset was depreciated $250,000 more for tax purposes, thus lowering taxable income for the current year. Because the benefit for the depreciation is being taken now for tax purposes and the asset will need to be depreciated in the future for financial purposes, this will cause a future temporary difference where taxable income > financial income. Therefore we have a deferred tax liability.
AUD: Pass
REG: Pass
BEC: Pass
FAR: PassFirst try CPA. Thank god. God bless America.
November 18, 2014 at 4:29 am #628547
mccaberpMemberCould you find that question? I'm curious now, too.
My understanding has been that you recognize warranty expense immediately if it can be reasonably estimated.
AUD: Pass
REG: Pass
BEC: Pass
FAR: PassFirst try CPA. Thank god. God bless America.
November 18, 2014 at 4:30 am #628548
SsbknycMember@CPAlmost sorry i didnt see this post until now
“Thanks Ssbknyc, but I'm still a bit confused. You said “At the interest payment date the investor will pay the total accrued interest for the period LESS the accrued interest that was already paid when they bought the bond”. So the investor pay twice? Once for the accrued interest when they buy the bond and again on the interest payment date? Did you mean that at the interest payment date the investor will RECEIVE the interest less accrued?”
To clarify, the investor does pay interest twice 1) Accrued interest between interest payment dates when you purchase the bond and 2) when its the interest payment date, however, you already paid a portion of the accrued interest when you purchased the bond so you will not pay interest on the full interest payment period.
Lets say there is a bond DATED Jan 1 and the interest is paid semiannually but you dont purchase it until April 1, the investor pays the price of the bond plus the accrued interest calculated for the first three months (Jan through March)
Now the first interest payment is due July 1, you are not going to pay interest on the first 6 months because you already paid accrued interest from Jan through March.
So how i approach the question is to calculate the interest paid for the full interest period (6 months) and subtract the accrued interest you already paid when you purchase the bond, which is accrued interest for the first 3 months of the 6 month interest period.
Hope its not too confusing, i tried to keep it as simple as possible
Done 08/2014-08/2015
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 82’ is closed to new replies.
