FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 82

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #188294
    jeff
    Keymaster

    SO I know every test is different but does anyone have any insight on what has been heavily tested recently? I take the exam Monday and I need to narrow my focus….Thanks!

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,629 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #628534
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    salring – thank you again!! I forgot to refer to OWNS – I dream of mnemonics and this one slipped my mind!

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #628535
    salring
    Participant

    No problem anytime I hope I will remember during my exam on the 26th

    #628536
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    You will!

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #628537
    Gabe
    Participant

    Anyone else using Ninja? What are your scores looking like?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #628538
    Gabe
    Participant

    Vadis Co. sells appliances that include a 3-year warranty. Service calls under the warranty are performed by an independent mechanic under a contract with Vadis. Based on experience, warranty costs are estimated at $30 for each machine sold. When should Vadis recognize these warranty costs?

    A.

    Evenly over the life of the warranty

    B.

    When the service calls are performed

    C.

    When payments are made to the mechanic

    D.

    When the machines are sold

    Normally I would say “A” is correct..but the answer is D. Is this because the repairs are not done by Vadis Co., but a contractor?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #628539
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @Gabe im at 62% average. test this Friday.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #628540
    mccaberp
    Member

    @gabe

    See the link I've attached. It will all make sense

    https://www.accountingtools.com/warranty-accounting

    AUD: Pass
    REG: Pass
    BEC: Pass
    FAR: Pass

    First try CPA. Thank god. God bless America.

    #628541
    Mehwish
    Member

    As a result of differences between depreciation for financial reporting purposes and tax purposes, the financial reporting basis of Noor Co.'s sole depreciable asset, acquired in 20X1, exceeded its tax basis by $250,000 at December 31, 20X1. The difference will reverse in future years. The enacted tax rate is 30% for 20X1 and 40% for future years. Noor has no other temporary differences. In its December 31, 20X1, balance sheet, how should Noor report the deferred tax effect of this difference?

    The answer is $100,000 liability

    I thought if the book expense was greater now, and taxed later…than its an asset.

    I saw the flip side of this where the tax depr. expense was greater than the book, and it was also a liability.

    Can some clairfy this?

    JE for this:

    Tax Expense

    DTL

    #628542
    Ssbknyc
    Member

    @mccaberp, thanks for the link…makes sense because of the matching principle, matching expenses against revenues for that certain product sale

    Done 08/2014-08/2015

    #628543
    Gabe
    Participant

    @Future awesome! I'm at 63% test on Saturday…look forward to your experience.

    @mcca there was another question about warranties where you recognize the expense over the life of the warranty…I can't recall specifics. Do you know what would cause that difference? (Thanks for the link 🙂 )

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #628544
    Gabe
    Participant

    @meh I used to know the answer…I really did. But I always just assume depreciation is a DTL.

    https://smallbusiness.chron.com/causes-deferred-tax-liability-55653.html

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #628545
    Future Ninja
    Participant

    @gabe sure thing. i'll post mine right away.

    AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
    FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
    BEC - 85
    REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,

    #628546
    mccaberp
    Member

    @Mehwish

    Take your time in reading the question and try and understand it. This was one of my biggest problems studying for all of these tests. I even inserted a flash card into my deck that would say “RTFQ” to remind me of the importance of this.

    The depreciable asset for tax purposes is $250,000 less than the basis for financial purposes. This means that the asset was depreciated $250,000 more for tax purposes, thus lowering taxable income for the current year. Because the benefit for the depreciation is being taken now for tax purposes and the asset will need to be depreciated in the future for financial purposes, this will cause a future temporary difference where taxable income > financial income. Therefore we have a deferred tax liability.

    AUD: Pass
    REG: Pass
    BEC: Pass
    FAR: Pass

    First try CPA. Thank god. God bless America.

    #628547
    mccaberp
    Member

    @Gabe

    Could you find that question? I'm curious now, too.

    My understanding has been that you recognize warranty expense immediately if it can be reasonably estimated.

    AUD: Pass
    REG: Pass
    BEC: Pass
    FAR: Pass

    First try CPA. Thank god. God bless America.

    #628548
    Ssbknyc
    Member

    @CPAlmost sorry i didnt see this post until now

    “Thanks Ssbknyc, but I'm still a bit confused. You said “At the interest payment date the investor will pay the total accrued interest for the period LESS the accrued interest that was already paid when they bought the bond”. So the investor pay twice? Once for the accrued interest when they buy the bond and again on the interest payment date? Did you mean that at the interest payment date the investor will RECEIVE the interest less accrued?”

    To clarify, the investor does pay interest twice 1) Accrued interest between interest payment dates when you purchase the bond and 2) when its the interest payment date, however, you already paid a portion of the accrued interest when you purchased the bond so you will not pay interest on the full interest payment period.

    Lets say there is a bond DATED Jan 1 and the interest is paid semiannually but you dont purchase it until April 1, the investor pays the price of the bond plus the accrued interest calculated for the first three months (Jan through March)

    Now the first interest payment is due July 1, you are not going to pay interest on the first 6 months because you already paid accrued interest from Jan through March.

    So how i approach the question is to calculate the interest paid for the full interest period (6 months) and subtract the accrued interest you already paid when you purchase the bond, which is accrued interest for the first 3 months of the 6 month interest period.

    Hope its not too confusing, i tried to keep it as simple as possible

    Done 08/2014-08/2015

Viewing 15 replies - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,629 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 82’ is closed to new replies.