- This topic has 1,629 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
OnMyWay732.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:33 pm #188294
-
AuthorReplies
-
November 16, 2014 at 12:08 am #628459
Future NinjaParticipantNovember 16, 2014 at 12:59 am #628460
ron10590MemberIn the statement of cash flows, why is bond amortization included in the operating section and not the financing section?
REG (7/14): 82
FAR (11/14): 81
BEC (1/15): 83
AUD (5/15):November 16, 2014 at 1:09 am #628461
ron10590MemberOh, I think it's because the under the indirect method, the operating section includes adjustments for current assets and liabilities, and the amortized part of the bond is considered a current liability.
REG (7/14): 82
FAR (11/14): 81
BEC (1/15): 83
AUD (5/15):November 16, 2014 at 1:51 am #628462
Future NinjaParticipantguys, im lost here in classifying which one is an asset or not. in determining existence of an asset, the right of ownership is essential?
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,November 16, 2014 at 4:03 am #628463
lab2008MemberI am currently trying to learn cost method, equity method, consolidation and acquisition method. Currently working problems on acquisition method. I noticed a lot of them are asking for what the consolidated amounts will be for various items such as consolidate R/E, Income, APIC, etc will be under the acquisition method. I understand APIC is investment in subsidiary less common stock, you have to used the R/E formula to get income, R/E are same as parents (one of the only things I remembered from my masters classes), at acquisition date, consolidated S/H equity equal parents S/H equity, but at year end it is (CS, APIC, NCI, and RE.)
Soo my question is just if i'm basically understanding all of these right. I think I missed assets which is the parents assets plus the increase in FV of the assets acquire by subsidiary.
AND on the below question. at the very bottom the solution is Consolidated net income is the same as parent company net income, when the equity method is used. Is this a typo? I was expecting it to ask for acquisition method. Is there something in the question that tells me it's equity, and if so is there a difference between consolidate equity method and acquisition method income, or even such a thing as consolidated equity method income? Thanks!!!
Consolidated net income is the same as parent company net income, when the equity method is used.
The separate condensed balance sheets and income statements of Purl Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Scott Corp., are as follows:
Balance Sheets
December 31,Year 1
Purl
Scott
Assets
Current assets
Cash $ $80,000 $ $60,000
Accounts receivable (net) 140,000 25,000
Inventories 90,000 50,000
Total current assets 310,000 135,000
Property, plant, and equipment (net) 625,000 280,000
Investment in Scott (equity method) 400,000 −
Total assets $ 1,335,000 $ 415,000
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable $160,000 $95,000
Accrued liabilities 110,000 30,000
Total current liabilities 270,000 125,000
Stockholders' equity
Common stock ($10 par) 300,000 50,000
Additional paid-in capital − 10,000
Retained earnings 765,000 230,000
Total stockholders' equity 1,065,000 290,000
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,335,000 $ 415,000
Income Statements
Year Ended December 31, Year 1
Purl
Scott
Sales $ 2,000,000 $ 750,000
Cost of goods sold 1,540,000 500,000
Gross margin 460,000 250,000
Operating expenses 260,000 150,000
Operating income 200,000 100,000
Equity in earnings of Scott 70,000 −
Income before income taxes 270,000 100,000
Provision for income taxes 60,000 30,000
Net income $ 210,000 $ 70,000
Additional information:
•On January 1, Year 1, Purl purchased for $360,000 all of Scott's $10 par, voting common stock.
•On January 1, Year 1, the fair value of Scott's assets and liabilities equaled their carrying amount of $395,000 and $145,000, respectively, except that the fair values of certain items identifiable in Scott's inventory were $10,000 more than their carrying amounts. These items were still on hand at December 31, Year 1.
•During Year 1, Purl and Scott paid cash dividends of $100,000 and $30,000, respectively. For tax purposes, Purl receives the 100% exclusion for dividends received from Scott.
•There were no intercompany transactions, except for Purl's receipt of dividends from Scott and Purl's recording of its share of Scott's earnings.
•Both Purl and Scott paid income taxes at the rate of 30%.
•During Year 1, there was no impairment of goodwill.
In the December 31, Year 1 consolidated financial statements of Purl and its subsidiary, net income should be:
a.
$270,000
b.
$210,000
c.
$190,000
d.
$170,000
Explanation
Choice “b” is correct, $210,000 net income. Consolidated net income is the same as parent company net income, when the equity method is used.
3 out of 4 passed and sitting for FAR on May 31. Will lose credit for Audit if I don't pass FAR by Aug 4. I love leases and bonds.
November 16, 2014 at 6:57 am #628464
Future NinjaParticipantI hate IFRS. makes my life more complicated. nighty night everyone.
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,November 16, 2014 at 11:14 am #628465
Future NinjaParticipant6am. rise and grind!
AUD - 79 (expired) retaking July 28,2016
FAR - 76 expiring July 31, 2016
BEC - 85
REG - 74,74,74,74,59,70,November 16, 2014 at 2:39 pm #628466
lab2008Member8:39 am rise and study 🙂
3 out of 4 passed and sitting for FAR on May 31. Will lose credit for Audit if I don't pass FAR by Aug 4. I love leases and bonds.
November 16, 2014 at 3:07 pm #628467
GabeParticipantBeen looking over AICPA released questions and came on a stock dividend question…
If it is a large stock dividend (>20-25%) you use PAR value (as in I got a big dividend so we're going to PARty)
If it is a small stock dividend (<20%) you use FV (as in I got a small dividend, it's FAIRly ok)
Here's the question for those interested:
A company whose stock is trading at $10 per share has 1,000 shares of $1 par common stock outstanding when the board of directors declares a 30% common stock dividend. Which of the following adjustments should be made when recording the stock dividend?
a. Treasury stock is debited for $300.
b. Additional paid-in capital is credited for $2,700.
c. Retained earnings is debited for $300.
d. Common stock is debited for $3,000.
(Answer is C)
DR RE 300 (PV)
CR C/S to be distributed 300
Hope this helps someone on test day 🙂
Anyone else have ways to help them remember things? (aside from Becker's)
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016November 16, 2014 at 3:58 pm #628468
GabeParticipantCPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016November 16, 2014 at 4:33 pm #628469
TroblinParticipantCan someone help walk me through this question? I see the ninja notes explanation, but I'm still not grasping it conceptually.
The following information is relevant to one of the City of Mullins' General Fund's derived tax revenues:
Fiscal year-end June 30
Beginning receivables $450,000
Beginning deferred revenues 100,000
Beginning allowance for doubtful accounts 50,000
Receipts 1,250,000
Ending receivables 600,000
Receivables collected 6/30 – 8/30 125,000
Ending allowance for doubtful accounts 60,000
The City of Mullins considers derived tax receivables collected within 60 days after the close of the fiscal year to be “available.” Furthermore, the City wrote off $30,000 of receivables as uncollectible during the year.
What would be the amount of revenues reported at the fund level?
A.
$1,400,000
Incorrect B.
$1,390,000
C.
$965,000
D.
$1,075,000
FAR: 85(11/22/2014) - Becker(full)/Ninja MCQ (5 day cram)
AUD: 79 (2/1/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja Notes
REG: 84(4/19/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja Notes
BEC: 83 (7/13/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja NotesDate I Got My Life Back!: 8/4/2015 🙂
November 16, 2014 at 4:44 pm #628470
MehwishMember^ Yeah, these problems are really complicated. I missed all of these types on the NINJA MCQ. I even made a separate topic about it, but never really understand when you recognize the revenue.
It would be great if someone can help!
November 16, 2014 at 7:12 pm #628471
SsbknycMemberFor those using Becker progress tests, I am unable to access my “saved” tests, which are previously taken progress tests. Anyone else having the same issue?
Done 08/2014-08/2015
November 16, 2014 at 9:41 pm #628472
Determined CPAParticipantSsbknyc – I just tried and mine is working fine
Why is RE reduced when a property dividend is declared? Can someone please walk me thru the logic instead of me memorizing that fact. thanks!!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.November 16, 2014 at 10:30 pm #628473
mb0363MemberWhy are the calculations different? 1st one uses the temp difference in year 2 and ignores the cumulative. and the second uses the cumulative and ignores the temporary difference.
Quinn Co. reported a net deferred tax asset of $9,000 in its December 31, Year 1, balance sheet. For Year 2, Quinn reported pretax financial statement income of $300,000. Temporary differences of $100,000 resulted in taxable income of $200,000 for Year 2. At December 31, Year 2, Quinn had cumulative taxable differences of $70,000. Quinn's effective income tax rate is 30%. In its December 31, Year 2, income statement, what should Quinn report as deferred income tax expense?
a. $21,000
b. $60,000
c. $30,000 CORRECT
d. $12,000
VS
Kent, Inc.'s reconciliation between financial statement and taxable income for Year 2 follows:
Pretax financial income- $ 150,000
Permanent difference- (12,000) = 138,000
Temporary difference-depreciation (9,000) =129,000
Additional information:
Cumulative temporary differences (future taxable amounts)
12/31/Year 1 $11,000
12/31/Year 2 $20,000
The enacted tax rate was 34% for Year 1 and 40% for Year 2 and years thereafter.
In its December 31, Year 2, balance sheet, what amount should Kent report as deferred income tax liability?
a. $3,600
b. $8,000 CORRECT
c. $6,800
d. $7,340
BEC - PASS
AUDIT - PASS
REG - PASS
FAR - PASS -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 77’ is closed to new replies.
