- This topic has 1,629 replies, 157 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
OnMyWay732.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:33 pm #188294
-
AuthorReplies
-
October 3, 2014 at 7:58 pm #627840
MeijersMemberStudy regulation full time in 2 weeks is really crazy. I agreed with Jeff, it's possible but it's going to be really really hard.
11/26/2014 - FAR
October 4, 2014 at 4:33 am #627841
AnonymousInactiveExtraordinary and Unusual Items, Question # 845
NuCorp. agreed to give Rand Co. a machine in full settlement of a note payable to Rand. The machine's original cost was $140,000. The note's face amount was $110,000. On the date of the agreement:
the note's carrying amount was $105,000, and its present value was $96,000.
the machine's carrying amount was $109,000, and its fair value was $96,000.
Assuming that this trade was made as part of troubled debt restructuring, what amount of gains/losses should NuCorp. recognize, and how should these be classified in its income statement?
A.
Extraordinary gain/loss: $(4,000); Other gain/loss: $0
B.
Extraordinary gain/loss: $9,000; Other gain/loss: $(13,000)
C.
Extraordinary gain/loss: $9,000; Other gain/loss: $(4,000)
D.
Extraordinary gain/loss: $0; Other gain/loss: $(4,000)
Extraordinary and Unusual Items, Question # 846
On October 15, 20X1, Kam Corp. informed Finn Co. that Kam would be unable to repay its $100,000 note due on October 31 to Finn. Finn agreed to accept title to Kam's computer equipment in full settlement of the note. The equipment's carrying value was $80,000 and its fair value was $75,000. Kam's tax rate is 30%. What amounts should Kam report as ordinary gain/loss and extraordinary gain for the year ended September 31, 20X2?
A.
Ordinary gain/loss: $(20,000); Extraordinary gain/loss: $0
B.
Ordinary gain/loss: $(5,000); Extraordinary gain/loss: $25,000
C.
Ordinary gain/loss: $0; Extraordinary gain/loss: $20,000
Correct D.
Ordinary gain/loss: $20,000; Extraordinary gain/loss: $0
October 4, 2014 at 9:51 pm #627842
AnonymousInactiveaspiring1accountant – I'm going with D and D.
October 5, 2014 at 1:56 pm #627843
MelansMemberAUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
BEC 7/19/13 81
REG 8/2/14 83
FAR - Jan 2015October 5, 2014 at 2:20 pm #627844
JuliemiddleMember@melans – To classify a S/T liability as L/T, you have to prove: Intent & Ability.
-Ability is proved in 3 ways: actually re-financing to a L/T liability before the financials are issued, Enter into a non-cancelable agreement, or Issue debt/equity securities that will replace the S/T debt.
-Selling inventory doesn't qualify, because Inventory is a S/T asset – you would be using a S/T asset to pay the debt, which would confirm that the debt should be listed as a S/T liability (definition of a Current Liability).
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 5, 2014 at 3:15 pm #627845
teamryan15MemberHey I have a quick question for anyone. This is a pretty basic question but I confused myself.
The estimated revenues control account of a governmental unit is debited when:
a Actual revenues are collected.
b.The budget is recorded.
c.The budget is closed at the end of the year.
d.Actual revenues are recorded.
Choice “b” is correct. Estimated revenue control account is part of the budget. The entry to record the budget is:
Debit (Dr)
Credit (Cr)
Estimated revenue control
$ XXX
Budgetary control
$ XXX
Now I got it right but the reason I am confused is because I Know that theres another Becker question where it says that when a budget is recorded . Shouldnt an appropriation also be in the above JE?
Estimated Revenue X Debit
Appropriations X Cred
Fund Balance X Cred
October 5, 2014 at 5:23 pm #627846
JuliemiddleMember@teamryan – An Appropriations entry does need to be made at the beginning of the year, but I'm not sure that it HAS to be in the same journal entry as the Estimated Revenue. The ending balance for Fund Balance is the same whether you make 2 separate JEs or one.
But, most importantly (and what the question is testing), you know that Budgeted Revenue is Debited, and Budgeted Appropriations is Credited at the beginning of the year.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 5, 2014 at 8:37 pm #627847
JuliemiddleMemberHow are y'all handling the massive amounts of information for this exam? I'm not handling it well.
I'm 2 weeks out, and I'm ridiculous stressed…I think I've cried twice in the past 2 weeks about this stupid exam. And, I just did a DEPS SIM and got 0% right because I made a stupid mistake at the beginning of the calculation. (Remember to subtract Treasury shares if the problem gives you Common shares ISSUED, to arrive at Shares outstanding!!!). I almost went incredible Hulk on my desk. FML.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 5, 2014 at 8:46 pm #627848
Peterman25ParticipantA company exchanged land with an appraised value of $50,000 and an original cost of $20,000 for machinery with a fair value of $55,000. Assuming that the transaction has commercial substance, what is the gain on the exchange?
A.
$0
B.
$5,000
C.
$30,000
D.
$35,000
BEC 7/14 - PASS
FAR 10/14 - PASS
AUD 1/15 - PASS
REG 4/15 - PASSAZ license - Official 8/20/2015
October 6, 2014 at 4:26 am #627849
LidisParticipantPeterman
The answer is C: 50,000-20,000= 30,000 Gain
If a transaction has commercial substance, the transaction is recorded at the FV of the asset received or FV of asset given up, whichever is more clearly evident.
Land 50,000
Machinery (BV) 20,000
Gain 30,000
October 6, 2014 at 11:05 am #627850
GabeParticipantOctober 6, 2014 at 12:24 pm #627851
JuliemiddleMemberFor PBO calculations, do you add back the entire PSC (prior service cost) adjustment? Or the amortized PSC amount for the period? I've royally confused myself.
@Revenue – Do you use $50k as the FV of Machinery b/c it's more reliable? Rather than the $55k?
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
October 6, 2014 at 2:32 pm #627852
MelansMember@Juliemiddle – thank you, I found the answer a little after posting. I thought I removed it before anyone answered. Again thank you!
AUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
BEC 7/19/13 81
REG 8/2/14 83
FAR - Jan 2015October 6, 2014 at 7:06 pm #627853
Peterman25ParticipantJulie – yes, you use the 50,000 amount because it is an “appraised value” and considered more reliable. I posted the question because it is all too easy to use the 55,000 FV mentioned and be done with the problem. FV is FV right? In this case, not necessarily.
BEC 7/14 - PASS
FAR 10/14 - PASS
AUD 1/15 - PASS
REG 4/15 - PASSAZ license - Official 8/20/2015
October 7, 2014 at 1:36 am #627854
JuliemiddleMemberWell, thanks for posting that question @peterman! I would have gotten it wrong.
AUD: 84 - Oct. 2013
BEC: 83 - Feb. 2014
REG: 91 - May, 2014
FAR: 68, 96 - Oct. 2014...DONECPAExcel, Ninja Audio (all sections)
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 36’ is closed to new replies.
