FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 17

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #188294
    jeff
    Keymaster

    SO I know every test is different but does anyone have any insight on what has been heavily tested recently? I take the exam Monday and I need to narrow my focus….Thanks!

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 241 through 255 (of 1,629 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #627547
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, so it reduced liability thought so but didn't know if you credit expense.

    #627548
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I might be wrong.. But someone please correct me if I am wrong.

    #627549
    Melans
    Member

    @Aspiringaccountant – I think because it is non-refundable, and the order was cancelled it would be come revenue. I am not 100% on that, but if the company doesn't have a liability to the client anymore, you wouldn't leave the funds there. And if it is non-refundable, you wouldn't give the funds back to the client- so I am assuming there is just no where else for them to be??

    Initially, I answered it like you did, but on second look- they wouldn't stay in the account.

    AUD 7/30/12 73; 12/2/13 85
    BEC 7/19/13 81
    REG 8/2/14 83
    FAR - Jan 2015

    #627550
    zkaraca2012
    Member

    @caakankshajain, yes you're absolutely correct! You need to debit expense and credit liability. Thank you for the correction!! 🙂

    AUD 78 Lost Credit, retake after FAR rematch
    BEC 83 (Expires 2015-02-28)
    FAR 71 Failed (2014-09-09), retake in Q4'14
    REG 80 (Expires 2015-11-30)

    #627551
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You mean debit liability and credit expense right?

    For LCM, what would be the answer here:

    NRV 8, NRV Less PM 6, RC 5, and OC 4.

    Would it be OC?

    #627552
    zkaraca2012
    Member

    @Cpahopeful, no DR: Expense CR: Liability.

    Come to think of it, the entry on the amortization of gain can also be:

    DR: Deferred tax expense – -OCI

    CR: Deferred tax liability – Income statement.

    And yes, the answer should be OC 4.

    AUD 78 Lost Credit, retake after FAR rematch
    BEC 83 (Expires 2015-02-28)
    FAR 71 Failed (2014-09-09), retake in Q4'14
    REG 80 (Expires 2015-11-30)

    #627553
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Zkaraca, I just studied the CIP section from the Roger book and the JEs only go as far as this:

    Billings: DR Receivable CR Billings

    Costs incurred: DR CIP CR Cash

    Collections: DR Cash CR Receivable

    Profit: DR CIP CR Income

    Project Completed: DR LT Asset CR CIP

    Year end: DR CIP Construction Exp CR Construction Revenue

    #627554
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So actual return on plan assets increases liability? Well, I didn't know that and clearly need more work on pensions

    #627555
    zkaraca2012
    Member

    @CPA, we were talking over the tax journals of the pension plans, not the actual pension plan items' journals.

    AUD 78 Lost Credit, retake after FAR rematch
    BEC 83 (Expires 2015-02-28)
    FAR 71 Failed (2014-09-09), retake in Q4'14
    REG 80 (Expires 2015-11-30)

    #627556
    zkaraca2012
    Member

    And I concur your j/e list for the CIP, they matched my Wiley notes. Happy Sunday!

    AUD 78 Lost Credit, retake after FAR rematch
    BEC 83 (Expires 2015-02-28)
    FAR 71 Failed (2014-09-09), retake in Q4'14
    REG 80 (Expires 2015-11-30)

    #627557
    RZHANG13
    Member

    Hi,guys. Really don't understand this question from F8.

    The employer net pension liability for the Golf City Fire Department increased by $200,000 from Year 1 to Year 2 as a result of a change in the formula used to compute benefits for retiring firemen. The change includes $150,000 of cost attributable to prior service. As a result of this change, Golf City will display the following on their Year 2 government-wide financial statements:

    a.Deferred outflows of resources of $50,000

    b.Pension Expense of $200,000

    c.Deferred outflows of resources of $150,000

    d.Deferred inflows of resources of $50,000

    Answer is A, but I chose C. Deferred outflow of resources of 150,000 because 150,000 attributes to prior service cost. And 50,000 should be expensed because that is for the current period. So could someone tell me why i was wrong? THANKS!

    #627558
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Found out I failed FAR last week, but I will go at it again. Just re-applying for the exam and purchasing the ninja set cost me an arm and a leg. although my stomach is having a hard time swallowing the amount of money i just spent, it will all be worth it in the end. putting my trust in the ninjas!

    #627559
    ksfc2727
    Member

    I'm on Becker chapter 2, is this stuff incredibly boring to anyone else? I've knocked out the other sections and I know none of them are “fun” to study for but in the early going, I'm not digging FAR. Material seems kind of random and difficult to apply. Probably just burnt out.

    #627560
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @ksfc2727, FAR is my last as well, and I'm extremely burnt out and disgusted with the difficulty of this material

    Moving on to F7 later today, will postpone my test date most likely..

    #627561
    moreinfo2013
    Member

    Let's hang in there!!! I “hear” some discouragement on some of your journeys and if anybody can understand is this team here on this forum…but we need to move on…we need to conquer this beast! Hang in there!

    A quote for today:

    “I'm not telling you it's going to be easy, I'm telling you it's going to be worth it!” Art Williams

Viewing 15 replies - 241 through 255 (of 1,629 total)
  • The topic ‘FAR Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 17’ is closed to new replies.