[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 90

Viewing 15 replies - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,797 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #598814
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Tiff, why do we use the 60% instead of the 40%?

    #598815
    TiffaNiffaNi
    Member

    Because, “40% is incurred evenly during the first contract year” – referring to the repairs that they perform on the service contracts. So, they perform 40% of the work the first year, which means they can recognize that portion of revenue. The question is asking for the deferred portion, so 1-.40 = 60%.

    In summary, 40% can be recognized this year because they have performed the services, and the remaining 60% is deferred until next year.

    FAR: 7/17/14- 79
    AUD: 8/20/14- 91
    REG: 10/1/14- 88
    BEC: 11/10/14- 85

    Becker Self-Study

    #598816
    D C
    Member

    What's up all? I haven't posted in a few weeks but now that I'm back on the study schedule to retake FAR on August 15th I wanted to run my strategy by you all to see if it makes sense. So I took it May 30th and a week later found out I got a 72. I didn't study that first week obviously but did some review over the next week. I had a two week trip out of the country so no studying. So almost a month off right after the exam.

    I started back up last Wednesday. I have only used Becker materials but did just buy ninja notes/audio to listen too. I am going back and redoing all the HW and Sims so I am giving myself about 2.5 days for each section so target finish date for this is July 31st. This leaves 14 days for final review. I plan on going thru the book to write down each journal entry from every topic and review the examples. No re-reading the notes. I think this will take at least 2 days maybe 3. I have FCs so I will review a few sections each day also. Then I think I will start my non stop progress tests of about 30 MCQs from all sections. Do three or four practice tests.

    I feel like I forgot a lot cause I took a month off. Does my plan sound ok?

    Any comments or suggestions would help!

    Thanks

    DC

    B - 80
    A - 71, 67, 77
    R - 71, 77
    F - 72, 77
    DONE!!
    Becker Self-study all the way! Did use Ninja Notes & Audio for FAR.

    #598817
    Vlakmir
    Member

    Well, FAR was challenging.

    We'll see how it turns out.

    As many have said before, don't skimp non profit and governmental- per the aicpa it is a combined 16-24% (14-21 questions on this relatively small, though boring, area)

    Good luck, everyone

    REG - 92
    AUD - 90
    BEC - 82
    FAR - 82
    BISK Review Materials
    DONE! /Happydance

    #598818
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    @Vlakmir – write in the exam experience thread!

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598819
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am getting confused with SE in consolidations. In a previous example I asked about (on page 13 of the forum), only the SE of the parent was included. But in this example they are combining the SE of the parent and the sub.

    On January 1, year 2, Neel Corp. issued 400,000 additional shares of $10 par value common stock in exchange for all of Pym Corp.’s common stock. Immediately before this business combination, Neel’s stockholders’ equity was $16,000,000 and Pym’s stockholders’ equity was $8,000,000. On January 1, year 2, the fair value of Neel’s common stock was $20 per share, and the fair value of Pym’s net assets was $8,000,000. Neel’s net income for the year ended December 31, year 2, exclusive of any consideration of Pym, was $2,500,000. Pym’s net income for the year ended December 31, year 2, was $600,000. During year 2 Neel paid dividends of $900,000. Neel had no business transactions with Pym in year 2.

    $26,200,000 is correct. The requirement is to determine the consolidated stockholders’ equity after an acquisition accounted for as an acquisition. Under the acquisition method, the assets and liabilities are brought over at their fair value (ASC Topic 810). Therefore, the increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from the acquisition will be the fair value of the stock issued, or $8,000,000 ($20 x 400,000). The consolidated stockholders’ equity immediately after the business combination is $24,000,000 ($16,000,000 + $8,000,000). Stockholders’ equity is then increased by the consolidated net income of $3,100,000 ($2,500,000 + $600,000) and decreased by the $900,000 of dividends paid. Thus, stockholders’ equity at December 31, year 2, is $26,200,000 ($24,000,000 + $3,100,000 – $900,000). Note that under the purchase method, only the results of operations of the acquired company subsequent to the date of combination is combined with the acquiring company’s results. It is because the combination was entered into January 1, that the entire year’s income of the acquired company is included.

    #598820
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CPA2014Dream,

    what are confused about in this question?

    1) Immediately before this business combination, Neel’s stockholders’ equity was $16,000,000

    2) Neel Corp. issued 400,000 additional shares of $10 par value common stock $8,000,000

    3) Neel’s net income for the year ended December 31, year 2 was $2,500,000

    4) Pym’s net income for the year ended December 31, year 2, was $600,000.

    5) During year 2 Neel paid dividends of $900,000.

    16000000 + 8000000 + 2500000 + 600000 – 900000 = 26200000

    8000000 is added because Neel issued stock which increased its equity. 600000 is added because the investment is accounted for under equity method during the year so Neel recorded

    DR Investment 600000

    CR Equity in earnings 600000

    #598821
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    What I am actually confused about in these questions on consolidations is what happens to cash that Parent pays for Sub if investment is purchased for cash. In all Roger's examples Paren's cash is reduced, but Sub's cash isn't increased. Where does it go? Wouldn't it go to Sub increasing it's assets by that same amount?

    #598822
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Very irritated by this one, how would I know if proceeds from sale of land are not already included? Why wouldn't they be?

    New England Co. had cash provided by operating activities of $351,000; cash used by investing activities of $420,000; and cash provided by financing activities of $250,000. New England's cash balance was $27,000 on January 1. During the year, there was a sale of land that resulted in a gain of $25,000 and proceeds of $40,000 were received from the sale. What was New England's cash balance at the end of the year?

    A. $27,000

    B. $40,000

    Incorrect C. $208,000

    D. $248,000

    #598823
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @anjaja

    my thought is…because it says “During the year” you can assume the net cash inflows and outflows are totals for the entire year.

    #598824
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    alright y'all…retaking my exam this saturday (AH!!!!!!!!H!). feeling like i'm ready get this show on the road, but also NOT!!

    what is everyone averaging on wiley and/or ninja mc's?

    i'm in the 75-80 on both, but not feeling comfortable… still getting scores in the 60's on a few quizzes.

    any last advice as i try to not freak myself out?

    #598825
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Correct answer is D, that would mean that sale of land isn't included which doesn't make sense. I think the answer is wrong. I found this same question in Roger's and the answer is 208000

    Good luck with your exam!

    #598826
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I just did this same question in Wiley today and the correct answer was C! pretty sure you are right…

    #598827
    Tncincy
    Participant

    @ dcflcpa, are your averages with sims?

    It begins with a 75
    Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to pass

    #598828
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @tncincy i believe so? i've completed all the sims for both test banks and it's the % that shows up in the dashboard.

Viewing 15 replies - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,797 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 90’ is closed to new replies.