[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 77

Viewing 15 replies - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 2,797 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #598618
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hello,

    I am not grasping the concept of why inventory errors correct themselves after two periods. Can someone explain this?

    If ending inventory is understated, cost of goods sold is overstated, and net income is, therefore, understated. The opposite is true for beginning inventory. Since ending inventory of one period is the beginning inventory of the next period, errors in inventory determination affect income for only two consecutive periods. Thus, the error in year 1 will be offset in year 2, and the error in year 2 will be offset in year 3. Since ending inventory is correct in year 3, retained earnings for year 3 will be correct even though year 3 net income was overstated.

    I have read it a billion times but I think I have to see it somehow. I dunno.

    #598619
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    one of the selections I had was “no entry required” so I just picked that one when I needed it. the part I didn't like much was every other line a potential entry could've gone did NOT give you “no entry required” after you already used it that one time, so I just left them blank. it felt odd leaving them blank, but I guess that's just the right thing to do. they do give you every other account name the problem could've had, just not the no entry required selection…

    so a journal looked like this

    line 1: account 1

    line 2: account 2

    line 3: account 3

    line 4: no entry required

    line 5-8: just blank, because the only other option would be an account name.

    anyways. I think you can also clear the cell by highlighting it (just by single-clicking on it) and hitting the Delete key on the keyboard. if you go to the AICPA's site, you can find a very small sample test which includes a couple of sims and play around with it, it's exactly how it'll appear on the exam.

    #598620
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @CPA2014Dream they offset each other because the error is for the same amount. if you look at the COGS equation:

    BI + Purchases – End Inventory = COGS

    if inventory is overstated by $100 in year 1, COGS will be understated by $100 in year 1. which means net income is over by $100, and RE is by extension over by $100.

    now in year 2, because year 1's ending inventory was $100 overstated, year 2's beginning inventory is overstated by $100, that same amount. if you look at the COGS formula, the effect of that will be to overstate COGS by $100 in year 2. which means net income is understated by $100 in year 2.

    now, net income flows into RE, which is cumulative. last year, RE was overstated by $100. this year, net income, which is $100 too low, flows into RE. so if you look at RE for year 2 ALONE, it's understated by $100. but year 1, it was overstated by $100. the net effect is 0. for example, in year 1, it should've been $100 but it was $200. in year 2, it should've been $200 but it was $100.

    it should have been $100 year 1 + $200 year 2 = $300 total

    due to errors, it was $200 year 1 + $100 year 2 = $300 total

    now in year 3, ending inventory was just fine for year 2, so beginning inventory is just fine for year 3. COGS will be unaffected, net income will be unaffected, so RE will be unaffected. with no more errors, everything has gone back to normal. you just have too much income in one year and not enough in another.

    #598621
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    CPA2014Dream

    Did you try to use an example with actual numbers?

    Y1 Beginning inv 100 – Ending inv 60 (should be 50) => COGS is 40 (s/b 50) in Y1 COGS is understated => income is overstated

    Y2 Beginning inventory 60 (s/b 50) – ending inv. 20 => Cogs is 40 (s/b 30) in Y2 Cogs is overstated => income is understated so Y1 over and Y2 under cancel each other

    #598622
    Guti
    Participant

    anjanja, the sales were for 800. I dont understand why it says 500K. Can someone help?

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #598623
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Gian, it must be wording of the question or rather my ESL. If I get something like this on the exam there is no way i can solve a puzzle like this in 1.5 or even in 5 minutes

    #598624
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    Will anyone be studying tonight? I'll be here tonight and all weekend aside from the Germany game. I'll have the Netherlands game on but still studying.

    Doing receivables/payables now and it's all just easy math stuff but gets so confusing!

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598625
    Lidis
    Participant

    Pine Company acquired all of the assets and liabilities of Straw Company for cash in a legal merger. Which one of the following would not be recognized by Pine on its books in recording the business combination?

    A. Accounts receivable

    B. Investment in Straw

    C. Intangible asset – Patent

    D. Accounts payable

    #598626
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    Investment? Because they are combining entities so there is no Straw anymore.

    I just know AR, AP, and Intangibles are recognized, haha.

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598627
    Guti
    Participant

    samdiegoCPA, you think Germany might win? If the best player in the World wakes up, Argentina might get it. Dont forget thay are playing a home game. I heard a lot of Brazilians sold their final game tickets. There might be 40,000 Argentines in that game or more.

    FAR-84
    AUD-
    REG-
    BEC-

    #598628
    ahugemistake
    Participant

    Just scheduled FAR for Aug 5th @ 1pm

    in San Francisco

    WHAT A RUSH

    FAR - 78*
    AUD - 66, 79
    REG - 73, 76
    BEC - 79

    #598629
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @dragnets I just downloaded the aicpa sample test and played around with it. You were right!! Delete key on the keyboard will delete the entry! :/ wish I would've known this during my exam. At least now I know thank you

    #598630
    samdiegoCPA
    Member

    @Gian Yes! I have to believe they will win… one of my best friends is a German guy who just got back from Brazil for the last few weeks… he would send me pics everyday and wow, wish I had gone even though I am not that into soccer, haha. I watched all of the USA, NED, GER games and a few others and it was actually really exciting!

    AUD: 84
    REG: 84
    BEC: 79
    FAR: 83

    #598631
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I finished the book and started my final review yesterday. So far I realized that I remember nothing on leases, installment sales and % of completion, ratios, it's just gone. I am sure there is more. My exam is on Aug. 9, I hope there is enough time to remember all of that stuff

    #598632
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is prepaid expenses a monetary or non-monetary item? It's monetary according to Roger, but non-monetary according to Gleim

Viewing 15 replies - 1,141 through 1,155 (of 2,797 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 77’ is closed to new replies.