[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 65

Viewing 15 replies - 961 through 975 (of 2,797 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #598429
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I've been using only Becker to study for FAR. I'm thinking of buying either Wiley, Gleim, or NINJA for more MCQ. Which do you suggest? Also, are you able to print the NINJA out? I had enough of staring at my computer all day.

    #598430
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Leaning towards getting the 2013 Wiley book. Am I crazy for not splurging on the 2014 version?

    #598431
    golfball7773
    Participant

    I am only using the videos now if I need a refresher on a certain topic or I completely don't understand something like Business Combinations

    FAR: 63, 55, 62
    REG: 65, 77*
    AUD: Fail, 64, 71
    BEC: 72, 74, 81

    *expired

    #598432
    j.ford
    Member

    I need help understanding the below question from the NINJA FAR questions….. From my understanding anytime there is cash within a transaction Gains/Losses should be recognized????

    During 20X1, Beam Co. paid $1,000 cash and traded inventory, which had a carrying amount of $20,000 and a fair value of $21,000, for other inventory in the same line of business with a fair value of $22,000. The exchange of the inventory is to facilitate sales to Beam's customers. What amount of gain (loss) should Beam record related to the inventory exchange?

    A. $2,000

    B. $1,000

    C. $0

    D. $(1,000)

    Answer: FASB ASC 845-10-30-1 specifies that the accounting for nonmonetary exchanges generally should be accounted for based on fair values, which is the same basis as that used for monetary transactions. FASB ASC 845-10-30-3 provides three exception cases in which a nonmonetary exchange should be recorded based on the recorded amount (book value) of the assets surrendered:

    1.Fair value is not determinable.

    2.Exchange transaction is to facilitate sales for customers.

    3.Exchange transaction lacks commercial substance.

    In Beam's case, exception 2 is met. The exchange of the inventory is to facilitate sales to Beam's customers. The exchange should be recorded based on carrying amounts with no gain recognized. If the inventory's carrying amount had been in excess of the fair value of the inventory given up, the inventory given up should have been written down and the loss recognized before the exchange was recorded

    #598433
    Tootsie
    Member

    @j.ford, I think in this problem, it lacks commercial substance and boot paid is below 25 percent; therefore, no gain is recognized. Yes, losses are recognized immediately for both types of transactions. There is no loss, so i think the answer is 0. What exactly do you not understand?

    FAR - 76
    AUD - 88!!! DONE!!!!!!!!
    BEC - 76
    REG - 77

    never, never, never give up

    #598434
    jennibfox
    Member

    Just got back. The SIMS were crazy hard. I doubt very highly that I passed. I don't really know a good way to prepare for these. I had a hard time finding the research one as well….not sure if I got it correct. But I guess you never know and Good Luck to you all.

    FAR - JULY 2014 - PASSED
    BEC - MAY 2015 - PASSED
    REG - AUG 2015 - PASSED
    AUD - AUG 31 2015

    #598435
    Tarheelgirl
    Member

    @jennibfox – As long as your score goes up and not down, then you have learned something. And you do never know with these exams.

    FAR - 46, 79 (7/8/14)
    AUD - 56, 59, 2/23/15 3rd times a charm!
    BEC - 69, 74 Really??
    REG - April, I hope. Fingers crossed!

    #598436
    j.ford
    Member

    @ Tootsie I think I might have the concept overly simplified in my rationale…. Thanks for the input. I take the test on Sunday and not feeling to good about it. So much info to remember. Back to MCQs to see what else I can remember

    #598437
    magatha12
    Member

    I am doing poorly on some of these NINJA SIMS..I am scared of the exam SIMS now gahh

    FAR: 79
    AUD: 81
    REG:5/29/15
    BEC:85

    Using CPA Excel, NINJA notes and audio, NINJA MCQs

    #598438
    jstay
    Participant

    Did a progress or F1-3 (reviewing, already went through most material in Becker. I scored a 52% on 45 questions. I then did 4 MCQ sections in F2. and did alright. I HATE non monetary transactions

    #598439
    thechapman
    Member

    @jstay – It almost seems like the hardest part about the nonmonetary transaction questions is determining whether the transaction has commercial substance or not because of the wording. The questions on that topic I get wrong are almost always not because I don't know the rules for gains etc, but because I think a transaction doesn't have commercial substance when it does…frustrating

    Passed - 2014

    #598440

    I took BEC today, and I am starting FAR studying tomorrow; August 28 is my test date….arghhhhhhh

    #598441
    JMOR
    Member

    @monkey wrench I'm right there with ya. I'm taking FAR 8/25.

    REG - 86
    FAR - 74,
    BEC - 72,
    AUD -73,

    #598442
    DandyDoge
    Participant

    Just got through EPS. Making some progress today! 🙂

    FAR: TBD
    BEC: TBD
    AUD: TBD
    REG: TBD

    #598443
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    J. ford… When its a non monetary exchange gain is only recognized when you receive boot not when you give boot. So here boot is given hence no gain. There should however be a loss for $1000, I think. Can you share the answer to this problem?

Viewing 15 replies - 961 through 975 (of 2,797 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 65’ is closed to new replies.