[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 329

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183478
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 4,921 through 4,935 (of 6,668 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #565482
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    A – I think

    Kind of remember you can't exceed over what was the Cost

    #565483
    NJPRU
    Member

    Though, I do have a quick question for you stoleway and Joe.. I remember last week stoleway posted a question about a prior period error and if it was considered a restatement retroactive or current period adjustment.. It appears it's a restatement instead of a retroactive adjustment. Can either one of you tell me the difference between the two? I'm a little lost on distinguishing the difference.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #565484
    stoleway
    Participant

    @NJPRU

    Restatement and retroactive are treated the same way, but I guess restatement goes back to other financial statements in the prior period to make corrections when presenting comparative financial statements.

    Retroactive only makes changes to the beginning RE in the current year.

    I stand to be corrected if I'm wrong.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #565485
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    You mean the difference between Retrospective and Retroactive

    Retrospective – I look at it as you have to Adjust your Opening RE from the periods that you are going to show in your Financials – Cumulative Effect adjustments – For Comparability in Your Financial statements.

    Retroactive – You need to reinstate your prior period FS because they had an Error – So its like going back and re-doing them to how they should have been done in the first place.

    The term “retroactive” is used when correcting and error, while “retrospective” is used for change in acctg principle or change in reporting entity.

    Think about it this way…if you have an error it means you f'd up and you have to “do it over correctly” aka restate

    Change in entity is something like consolidating or combining for the first time. Remember that you have to go back and show what your comparative financials would have looked like had you consolidated in previously presented years (not just the year you started consolidating) for comparability.

    #565486
    NJPRU
    Member

    Stoleway – thank you. So, just to be clear.. for retrospective adjustments like a change in principle.. only RE is changed and assets and liabilities are not?

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #565487
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am reading about pensions now, everything is clear except that i don't understand who does the company pay money to.

    So there is an expense of $10 and there is a cash $10. Who gets the cash? John Hancock mutual fund or similar?

    #565488
    stoleway
    Participant

    Retrospective App affects 3 elements of your financial statement.

    RE, assets and liabilities.

    eg if you mistakenly expensed PPE in the prior year.

    PPE as an asset will be debited

    RE will be credited (due to understatement of income)

    Defered tax liability will be affected as well

    PPE…………………………DR

    RE…………………………………………….CR

    DTL……………………………………………CR

    I think every situation is unique, but this should be order in most cases.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #565489
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    The retirees get the money.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #565490
    NJPRU
    Member

    Wow! Thanks for taking time Kenada and Stoleway.. it's really appreciated!

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #565491
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    Sorry Anna…that should end with a question.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #565492
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Joe, are you sure? What if nobody retired yet?

    #565493
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    Sorry NJ – Could not think of good response….my brain is on 40 SIMS in one day.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

    #565494
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry, I'll google it, I am just afraid I'll get 3 pages with advertisement

    #565495
    NJPRU
    Member

    I thought the money would go to let's say TIAA CREF or Fidelity who would then invest it in mutual funds to obtain a return in investments, etc?

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #565496
    jrosen92770
    Participant

    Not sure Anna.

    BEC - 5/26/2013 75
    REG - 8/31/2013 82
    AUD - 11/24/2013 74, 2/9/2014 92
    FAR - 5/25/2014 85

    NY CPA

Viewing 15 replies - 4,921 through 4,935 (of 6,668 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] FAR Study Group 2014 - Page 329’ is closed to new replies.