[Q3] BEC Study Group 2014 - Page 87

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #185552
    jeff
    Keymaster

    @h0wdyus

    Incorrect

    The answer is B. Comparable sales.

    “The use of comparable sales is not an income approach to valuation of a business, it is a market approach. Under the comparable sales approach, the value of a business is determined by comparing it to other entities with comparable characteristics for which the value is more readily determinable.”

    This was a tricky one

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 2,289 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #594912
    TigerWoods
    Member

    Do you guys do the simulations at all? I'm taking it rather quickly (3 weeks) and don't know if there is much benefit in taking time to write out solutions.

    #594913
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I just want to say good luck to anyone testing this week!

    #594914
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I am struggling with an IT concept that I came across in the Becker book (B4-33).

    The book specifically says that systems analysts and computer programmers should have segregation of duties.

    Then I got a MCQ that reads as follows:

    Which of the following statements is not correct for segregation of duties in an IT environment?

    a. The IT department is a support group in that it normally does not initiate or authorize transactions.

    b. Segregation of duties in an IT environment normally revolves around granting and/or restricting access to production data and/or production programs.

    c. The duties of system analysts and application programmers should never be combined.

    d. Segregation of duties in an IT environment is defined as dividing responsibilities for different portions of a transaction among several different people.

    Here's the answer:

    Choice “c” is correct as it is the only incorrect statement. The duties of system analysts and application programmers can be, and often are, combined. The duties of system programmers and application programmers should not be combined.

    These two points seem to contradict each other. Anyone else struggling with this?

    #594915
    M.O.D.
    Member

    System analysts design (flowchart) entire computer (IT) systems.

    System programmers program operating systems (ie Windows)

    Application programmers program application programs (ie Quickbooks)

    The most fundamental separation is between the application programmer (QB programmer) and the program operator (ie Quickbooks entry).

    I agree with:

    The duties of system analysts and application programmers can be, and often are, combined.

    I don't agree with:

    The duties of system programmers and application programmers should not be combined.

    Programming is programming, and operations should be separated.

    BA Mathematics, UC Berkeley
    Certificates in CPA and EA preparation, College of San Mateo
    CMA I 420, II 470
    FAR 91, AUD Feb 2015 (Gleim self-study)

    #594916
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Got it! Thank you!!

    #594917
    stoleway
    Participant

    Which of the following causes a reduction in the quantity demanded of product X?

    A Consumers see product X as less desirable.

    B Consumers buy more of a substitute good for X.

    C The price of X increases.

    D Consumers have higher income and X is an inferior good.

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #594918
    mikecuh
    Member

    @M.O.D.

    Thank you for your explanation. I think I am kind of getting the hang of it now thank god since my test is Thursday. One thing that for whatever reason is still confusing me is Fixed Overhead Volume Variance. I get the right number every time, but I'm always wrong on the favorable or unfavorable part. It makes no sense to me lol

    @Stoleway

    C. A change in quantity demanded is a movement along the demand curve (not a shift of the demand curve) which is caused by a price change which in this case is a price increase because there is a reduction of quantity demanded.

    #594919
    stoleway
    Participant

    @mikecuh

    correct

    REG -63│ 84!!
    BEC- 59│70│ 71 │78!
    AUD- 75!
    FAR- 87!

    Mass-CPA

    #594920
    GoVPI
    Participant

    Is this a good practice question for the exam?

    Salem Co. is considering a project that yields annual net cash inflows of $420,000 for years 1 through 5, and a net cash inflow of $100,000 in year 6. The project will require an initial investment of $1,800,000. Salem’s cost of capital is 10%. Present value information is presented below.

    Present value of $1 for 5 years at 10% is .62.

    Present value of $1 for 6 years at 10% is .56.

    Present value of an annuity of $1 for 5 years at 10% is 3.79.

    What was Salem’s expected net present value for this project?

    $83,000

    $(108,200)

    $(152,200)

    $(442,000)

    BEC 8/14/14 - Passed
    Graduated from college 12/13/14
    AUD 8/31/15 - 74. Retake - Passed
    REG
    FAR

    #594921
    klink24
    Participant

    @CPAin14, (152,200).

    FAR: 4/19/2014 - 85!
    AUD: 5/27/2014 - 90!
    REG: 7/18/2014 - 81!
    BEC: 8/13/2014 - 84!

    4 up, 4 down, in 4 months.

    Licensed 9/22 in NC.

    #594922
    TigerWoods
    Member

    Anyone else cramming this test in before September? I'm on B2.

    #594923
    shaulec82
    Member

    Anyone have any pointers on the written communications? I'm not too concerned about my writing/grammatical skills, but I'm having a small panic attack about the amount of technical information it seems necessary to know…

    AUD - 86
    BEC - 81
    REG - Nov 6
    FAR - Jan 16

    #594924
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Does anyone have feedback on the BEC audio? I used the audio for REG and found it to be helpful, however it seems like maybe for BEC or FAR it wouldn't be as beneficial. I have passed BEC with the materials I have now (and lost credit recently), but was considering supplemental material to be sure I get it knocked out…again. Any feedback would be great. Thanks!!

    FAR 82, Pending score… (lost credit)

    AUD 83

    REG 63, 70, 70, 74, 87

    BEC 85, lost credit to take in Oct.

    #594925
    Zackrampage
    Member

    Just rocked on 2 seemingly hard Cost accounting (COGS/COGM) questions. Feeling pumped. 2 weeks 2 days till exam day!

    FAR - 62 , End of aug 2015
    BEC - 67, 67
    AUD - TBD
    REG - TBD

    #594926
    RandomAlt
    Member

    @cbscpa … I have actually found the audio to be very beneficial. I would say it is a VERY high level overview of the concepts, but there is enough material there for really good reinforcement.

    I generally listen to the audios on my drive into work, and back home.

    FAR - [10/07/2013 --> 66] [07/07/2014 --> 86]
    BEC - [08/31/2014 --> 86]
    AUD - [11/24/2014 --> 88]
    REG - [02/14/2015 --> 92]

Viewing 15 replies - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 2,289 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] BEC Study Group 2014 - Page 87’ is closed to new replies.