[Q2] BEC Study Group 2014 - Page 32

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #183480
    jeff
    Keymaster

    I’ve had a few requests for April/May Study Groups…March will be here before you know it.

    In order to take an early April exam, you should begin studying…now. 🙂

    Jeff Elliott, CPA (KS) | Another71 | NINJA CPA | NINJA CMA | NINJA CPE

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 625 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #558336
    greenfish
    Member

    @DeterminedCPA…. so what is the easiest way to get the weighted average solution for that problem?

    #558337
    MrsBing
    Member

    I am so upset with the prometric website. I've been checking regularly to see if a May 31st day is available. I finally found one 5 minutes ago, so I tried to reschedule. As I'm filling out everything and hit the next button it says my session is expired and to start over. I start over and the appointment is now gone. 🙁

    Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!

    FAR: 89
    REG: 87
    AUD: 92
    BEC: 75
    Ethics: 90

    Licensed Arizona CPA

    #558338
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Keep trying MrsBing..there are bound to be more people canceling there tests…especially in the next week. Good luck to all those taking the exam this week. Let's make this weekend productive!!!

    #558339
    Lucky11189
    Participant

    Mrs. Bing.

    That has happened to me…sometimes it's not available because I'm assuming the site is still trying to reset from when you tried to sign up…keep checking.

    I have gotten it a few minutes later!

    FAR- 84 (August 2014)
    REG- 85 (November 2013)
    AUD- 85 (January 2014)
    BEC- 83 (May 2014)

    #558340
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    greenfish – for questions like this, I always set it up the same

    WA – 2 step

    1. units complete

    2. ending wip * % complete

    1. 92,000

    2. $21,600 (24,000*.90 (materials))

    Totals $113,600 Equivalent Units

    For WA, you always want to divide the equivalent units you just found by BOTH current and beginning costs

    54,560 + 468,800 (both current and beginning costs for materials only, since that is what the questions asks)

    divided by

    113,600

    522,560/113,600=4.60

    If they asked for WA for conversion costs instead of materials, you would set it up the same but take 40% of your ending inventory and divided your equivalent units by 20,320+15,240+182,880+391,160 (since conversion costs = DL + MOH)

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #558341
    Jsingh23
    Member

    Determined-CPA

    Great point of view…def agree with you.

    Miss Bing- I am using WIley CPA Excel 2014 and I assumed they were both one in the same….but I'm not really sure.

    AUDIT-89
    BEC-83
    REG-78
    FAR- April 19

    #558342

    ChemKing uses a standard costing system in the manufacture of its single product. The 35,000 units of raw material in inventory were purchased for $105,000, and two units of raw material are required to produce one unit of final product. In November, the company produced 12,000 units of product. The standard allowed for material was $60,000, and there was an unfavorable quantity variance of $2,500.

    The materials price variance for the units used in November was:

    a. $11,000 unfavorable.

    b. $2,500 favorable.

    c. $2,500 unfavorable.

    d. $12,500 unfavorable.

    where in the becker book did they ever talk about a materials price variance for units USED, they talked about the price variance for units PURCHASED but i never saw units used. can anyone point me to the page this was explained on in the becker book?

    FAR: PASSED
    REG: PASSED
    AUD: PASSED
    BEC: PASSED

    DONE

    #558343
    MrsBing
    Member

    I was just able to reschedule for the 31st :).

    @jsingh, I just sighed up for the 2 week free trial for CPA Excel, and it doesn't look like it comes with the test bank. So, I guess I'm just going to purchase the NINJA MCQs.

    Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!

    FAR: 89
    REG: 87
    AUD: 92
    BEC: 75
    Ethics: 90

    Licensed Arizona CPA

    #558344
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    MrsBing – good feeling, right? I rescheduled yesterday from the 23 to the 31! Extra time to master variance (is that possible??). Good luck!

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #558345
    Determined CPA
    Participant

    A - 75
    B - 78 God is good.
    F - 77 Answered prayers.
    R - 84! Done!!

    Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
    Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.

    #558346
    j.ford
    Member

    @ Scarlett Knight – I am using CPA excel so I am not sure where you would find this in Becker. However, the below are the formula's you would need to use.

    Quantity Variance = Standard Price * (Actual Quantity – Standard Quantity)

    Price Variance = Actual Quantity * (Actual Price – Standard Price)

    This is how I worked through it:

    Standard Cost =$60k

    Standard Quantiy = 24k (12k units * 2 raw material)

    Standard Price = $2.50

    $2500 = $2.50*(Actual Quantity-24000)

    Actual Quantity=25,000

    Price Variance = 25,000*($3.00-$2.50)

    Price Variance = 12,500 unfavorable

    ****Actual Price = 35k @ $105k = $3.00 per unit of raw materials

    #558347

    j.ford, thanks i understood the calculation but the becker book never raised that scenario. all they went over was the price variance for dm purchases, not price variances for dm used. thanks again though for trying to help

    FAR: PASSED
    REG: PASSED
    AUD: PASSED
    BEC: PASSED

    DONE

    #558348
    j.ford
    Member

    @ ScarletKnight – here is a simialer example from CPA Excel **** formatting not the best when copying

    Virgil Corp. uses a standard cost system. In May, Virgil purchased and used 17,500 pounds of materials at a cost of $70,000. The materials usage variance was $2,500 unfavorable, and the standard materials allowed for May production was 17,000 pounds. What was the materials price variance for May?

    A. $17,500 favorable. <—-correct answer

    B. $17,500 unfavorable.

    C. $15,000 favorable.

    D. $15,000 unfavorable.

    This answer is correct. Using the model suggested in the study text to perform the calculations:

    Units Price/Unit Total

    Standard Costs 17,000 lbs. x Std. Price = ???

    Actual Costs 17,500 lbs. x $4.00* = $70,000

    Differences (500) lbs. ??? ???

    *Actual Price = $70,000/17,500 lbs. = $4.00

    Usage variance = ($2,500) = Difference in Units x Std. Price

    = (500) x Std. Price

    Std. Price = ($2,500) / (500) = $5.00 per unit

    Substituting the standard price into the previous calculation, we now have:

    Units Price/Unit Total

    Standard Costs 17,000 lbs. x $5.00 = $85,000

    Actual Costs 17,500 lbs. x $4.00* = $70,000

    Differences (500) lbs. $1.00 $15,000

    Price variance = Difference in Price x Actual Quantity Used =

    $1.00 x 17,500 = 17,500 favorable various

    Check: Usage Variance + Price Variance = Total Difference in Costs

    ($2,500) + $17,500 = $15,000

    #558349
    taxman89
    Participant

    The Look Company is considering an investment that would require an initial investment of $120,000. The investment would provide cash inflows of $20,000 per year for 10 years, starting one year from today. Look is trying to compute the internal rate of return for this investment.

    On the line for 10 periods on the present value of an annuity factor table, the factor is 6.145 for 10%. If the hurdle rate for acceptable projects is 10%, will the project be accepted?

    A. Yes

    B. No

    C. The internal rate of return is equal to the hurdle rate.

    D. Cannot be determined from information given


    ok so the way i was thinking this through was the 20k times the annuity factor =122900 (20000 * 6.145). so the easy answer would be yes because 122900>120000. (which was the answer).

    I was thinking that since the inflows dont start for a year you would need to discount that 122900 1 year to get the correct npv which would make it 111727 (122900/1.1)

    can anyone tell me why jeff is right and i dont discount it for that additional year?

    Aud-75 3x I knew i never liked you
    Bec-77 1x being in the bubble is stressful
    Reg-82 4x its not me its you...and no we cant be friends
    Far-78 1x easiest section

    #558350
    j.ford
    Member

    @taxman – simple annuity definition payment is at the end of the period(“starting one year from today”) so there would be no need to discount it further since you are using the annuity discount factor. You might have been trying to make this one hader than it needed to be.

Viewing 15 replies - 466 through 480 (of 625 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q2] BEC Study Group 2014 - Page 32’ is closed to new replies.