- This topic has 625 replies, 90 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
MrsBing.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:59 pm #183480
-
AuthorReplies
-
May 12, 2014 at 2:18 pm #558306
scarletknight91Memberby the way, that's a very shady question haha. why under byproduct costing would a selling expense be ever recognized as a cogs?
FAR: PASSED
REG: PASSED
AUD: PASSED
BEC: PASSEDDONE
May 12, 2014 at 4:55 pm #558307
titoav15Participant@scarletknight91 definitely a shady question! Once I understood the point and treatment I get it! 🙂
BEC: 5/21/14 82! PASSED HALF WAY THERE!
FAR: 4/2/15 80! Almost there!
AUD: 69, 74, 4/3/14 81! PASSED
REG: TBDMay 13, 2014 at 2:42 am #558308
linds0121ParticipantHi all!
I have a question that I've been stuck on from B2:
Lynn Manufacturing Co. prepares income statements using both standard absorption and standard variable costing methods. For Year 2, unit standard costs were unchanged from Year 1. In Year 2, the only beginning and ending inventories were finished goods of 5,000 units. How would Lynn’s ratios using absorption costing compare with those using variable costing?
Current Ratio Return on Stockholders’ equity
a. Greater Same
b. Greater Smaller
c. Same Same
d. Same Smaller
The correct answer is b.
Can anyone tell me why b is the correct answer?
There are only two options: Make progress or make excuses!
Audit: 1st 71, 2nd 93
BEC: 80
FAR: 84
REG: 78May 13, 2014 at 2:12 pm #558309
Determined CPAParticipantlinds0121 – this is how I understand it, I hope I'm right.
The question says there is inventory, so production is greater than sales, which means that absorption costing net income will be greater than variable costing.
With that said, if there is inventory, than current assets will increase. The current ratio = CA/CL. If you increase inventory, you increase CA. An increase in CA will cause the current ratio to increase.
Return on stockholders equity = Net income/Equity. Also remember that Assets = Liabilities + Equity. When you increase your inventory, you increase your assets. Liabilities will remain unchanged, causing your equity to increase. When equity increases, return on equity decreases.
Example:
Original numbers:
CA = 10,000
CL = 5,000
Equity = 5,000
10,000 = 5,000+5,000
Example Numbers (increasing inventory the 5000)
CA = 15,000 (original 10000 + 5000)
CL = 5,000 (unchanged)
Equity = 10,000 (5000 increase to make CA=CL+Equity)
Current Ration = CA/CL
Original = 10,000/5,000 = 2 current ratio
Example = 15,000/5,000 = 3 current ratio
Therefore, increase in current ratio
Return on Equity = NI/Equity
Assume NI = 500,000
Original = 500,000/10,000 = 50
Example = 500,000/15,000 = 33.33
Therefore, decrease in return on equity
Hope this helps!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.May 13, 2014 at 8:43 pm #558310
MrsBingMemberThe end of B6 sucks. How important do you think the Becker B6 financial formulas are? This is the first time that I can say that Becker did a horrible job explaining this. They make no sense and there's so many of them.
Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!
FAR: 89
REG: 87
AUD: 92
BEC: 75
Ethics: 90Licensed Arizona CPA
May 13, 2014 at 8:53 pm #558311
Determined CPAParticipantMrsBing – I was just looking at a prior post of yours and was hoping you could explain your thinking process.
your question was about what is part of inventory for variable costing and you thought it was all variable costs, but instead it's only VOH, not VSG&A. That's confusing me now – can you explain your thinking? thanks!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.May 13, 2014 at 9:38 pm #558312
IWPGirlMember@CPA90x: Similar exam experience yesterday… I would've loved to have less concept-based questions. They seem to throw me off the most. Oh, that COSO!
@MrsBing: I learned that Becker emphasizes the material and formulas you are most likely to see on the exam day. I remember B-6 had a couple of pages with financial formulas . I just practiced and memorized what I could. I hope I passed…AUD - 90
REG - 78
BEC - 84
FAR - 91 woo hoooo!!Becker and Ninja MCQ
May 14, 2014 at 4:24 am #558313
MrsBingMember@determined, I was getting the product cost confused with the income sheet format. So product cost includes DM, DL and VOH.
The IS format is Sales – (DM, DL, VOH and VSGA) = Contribution Margin
Becker, Wiley Test Bank, and Ninja 10 Point Combo!
FAR: 89
REG: 87
AUD: 92
BEC: 75
Ethics: 90Licensed Arizona CPA
May 14, 2014 at 1:07 pm #558314
Determined CPAParticipantGot it! Thank you!
A - 75
B - 78 God is good.
F - 77 Answered prayers.
R - 84! Done!!Paperwork sent - waiting for license!!
Still on a cloud and in shock. Through God, all things will happen.May 14, 2014 at 5:40 pm #558315
AnonymousInactiveI take BEC tomorrow, here in IL. Just doing a final review of all the chapters before I start the Final Exams……. Wish me luck. Only had roughly 3 weeks to cover my material bc I just test FAR on April 22….. But once May 23rd gets here, I'll know both FAR and BEC scores! Praying for both to be passing scores!
Good luck to everyone testing!
May 14, 2014 at 9:42 pm #558316
scarletknight91Memberis the difference between transaction exposure and economic exposure with regards to exchange rates is that 1) you suffer an economic loss or a gain with respect to transaction exposure and 2) you'll have changes in cash flows with respect to economic exposure
when applying the two concepts, they go hand in hand correct? for instance, if you have an A/P denominated in Euros and the Euro is appreciating in value, then the A/P will suffer transaction exposure via an economic loss [more $ needed to pay for A/P) while its cash flows will suffer economic exposure via an increase in required cash outflows [again, more $ needed to pay for A/P)
is the correct interpretation between the two concepts?
FAR: PASSED
REG: PASSED
AUD: PASSED
BEC: PASSEDDONE
May 15, 2014 at 7:02 pm #558317
scarletknight91Memberanybody? haha
FAR: PASSED
REG: PASSED
AUD: PASSED
BEC: PASSEDDONE
May 15, 2014 at 8:20 pm #558318
mjp44Memberyea..off the top of my head economic exposure focuses more on the longer term and transaction exposure is short term and focuses on individual transactions. I think for both you can suffer gains or losses. I think the big difference is economic is long-term, big picture stuff where as transaction exposure is short-term.
FAR- PASSED (11/13)
REG- PASSED (2/14)
BEC- PASSED (5/14)
AUD- PASSED (8/14)If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.
May 15, 2014 at 9:50 pm #558319
AnonymousInactive2 weeks!!!!
May 15, 2014 at 11:32 pm #558320
GoVPIParticipantI have completed Becker 1, 2 (took forever), 4. I am now on to 5 & 6. Gonna go back and hit 3 closer to date.
Wanted to take it this test window but no way my app would be approved in time since I just finished up classes the 9th. Looks like early July it is. Been doing pretty good on Wiley Test bank MCQ, but I am basically teaching myself Cost Accounting (bad professor, language barrier was huge).
BEC 8/14/14 - Passed
Graduated from college 12/13/14
AUD 8/31/15 - 74. Retake - Passed
REG
FAR -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] BEC Study Group 2014 - Page 30’ is closed to new replies.
