- This topic has 625 replies, 90 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
MrsBing.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:59 pm #183480
-
AuthorReplies
-
April 27, 2014 at 11:56 pm #558168
mjp44MemberJonathan Manufacturing adopted a job-costing system. For the current year, budgeted cost driver activity levels for direct labor hours and direct labor costs were 20,000 and $100,000, respectively. In addition, budgeted variable and fixed factory overhead costs were $50,000 and $25,000, respectively. Actual costs and hours for the year were as follows:
Direct labor hours 21,000
Direct labor costs $110,000
Machine hours 35,000
For a particular job, 1,500 direct-labor hours were used. Using direct-labor hours as the cost driver, what amount of overhead should be applied to this job?
A. $7,500
B. $3,214
C. $5,625
Answer (C) is correct.
D. $5,357
Little confused with the calculation of Fixed and Variable Overhead rates…According to Ninja Notes the fixed rate is calculated as budgeted costs/normal capacity and variable overhead rate= budgeted activity/ actual activity. However, in this problem they use the normal direct labor hours of 20,000 for both fixed and variable.
Answer:
To apply overhead to the job, both variable and fixed overhead must be properly allocated using standard rates and direct-labor hours as the cost driver. The pertinent information given for this year’s budget includes direct-labor hours of 20,000 and the budgeted variable and fixed factory overhead of $50,000 and $25,000, respectively. The variable overhead cost per direct labor hour is $2.50 ($50,000 ÷ 20,000 DLH), and the fixed overhead per direct labor hour is $1.25 ($25,000 ÷ 20,000 DLH). Thus, the total standard overhead cost per direct labor hour is $3.75. The total overhead to be applied is $5,625 (1,500 DLH × $3.75).
I thought variable overhead/unit should of been calculated as $50,000/21,000 hours = 2.38. 2.38 x 1,500= 3570.
FAR- PASSED (11/13)
REG- PASSED (2/14)
BEC- PASSED (5/14)
AUD- PASSED (8/14)If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.
April 28, 2014 at 1:56 am #558169
titoav15ParticipantJust wondering for the people that took BEC already, what would be best sections to focus on? I took audit and moved on to BEC now and its all over the place (with Becker anyway). Tips for studying would be helpful! Thanks 🙂
BEC: 5/21/14 82! PASSED HALF WAY THERE!
FAR: 4/2/15 80! Almost there!
AUD: 69, 74, 4/3/14 81! PASSED
REG: TBDApril 28, 2014 at 2:32 am #558170
QuinacridoneMemberMjp44, you have to first establish the rate which is using the budgeted or projected amounts. The 21,000 is the ACTUAL direct labor hours. You need to use the 20,000 (“budgeted cost driver activity level for direct labor hours) with the $50K (for variable) and $25K (for fixed). Once you have the rates established (50K/20K = $2.50; and 25K/20K = $1.25).
Those actual costs that are listed in the problem are distractors – they appear to be totals for all jobs, which we aren't interested in for this particular job. The question wants us to use the 1,500 direct labor hours that are attributable to this job only.
Hope that helps.
REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
BEC - May 6, 2014: 83Florida CPA 24 July 2014
(Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)April 28, 2014 at 1:12 pm #558172
mjp44MemberThanks Quin. In Ninja notes it shows that the variable O/H rate is calculated as estimated activity/ Actual activity. Is not the same calculation needed to calculate the rate to apply to the 1500?
FAR- PASSED (11/13)
REG- PASSED (2/14)
BEC- PASSED (5/14)
AUD- PASSED (8/14)If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.
April 28, 2014 at 4:59 pm #558174
icandoitParticipant@Quinacridone. Thank you. I will look for 2014 COSO. Now I am on Economic Concepts. It's been too long since I studied Econ. Good luck everyone!
FAR: 74 (02/2014), Waiting (04/14/2014)
BEC: 72 (in 2011)
REG: 75 (Expired)
AUD: TBD
FAR: 74, 80
BEC: 70, 68, 2/28/15
REG: 75 Expired; 72
AUD: TBD"And all things, whatsoever you shall ask in prayer, believing, you shall receive". Matthew 21:22
April 28, 2014 at 7:38 pm #558175
scarletknight91MemberApril 28, 2014 at 11:17 pm #558176
QuinacridoneMemberScarletknight, each chapter is going to have challenges! Chapters 1, 2, and 3 are very formula heavy and homework heavy. I did not do all of the homework in one sitting – instead, I did a little bit in each chapter all throughout my journey through the book. Since I only gave myself a month to study, I knew I needed to work quickly. Chapter 6 has a lot of pesky little things, and chapter 5 is all your micro and macro economics (a breeze if you were good at it in college). Chapter 4 is a bear if you are like me and have zero computer knowledge.
I'm now seven days out from my BEC test. I'm aware of my weak areas and plan to do intense work in each section over the next few days as well as completing a Becker's progress test each night. I'm away at training for work which is good and bad – alone in a hotel room at night (no TV to distract), but unfortunately, am having to do some studies at night for training. Goodness, I hope I can pull this off.
REG - Nov 4, 2013: 88
FAR - Feb 27, 2014: 86
AUD - April 5, 2014: 91
BEC - May 6, 2014: 83Florida CPA 24 July 2014
(Done in seven months - thank you Jesus!!)April 29, 2014 at 1:24 pm #558177
scarletknight91Memberthanks Quinacridone, best of luck to you!
FAR: PASSED
REG: PASSED
AUD: PASSED
BEC: PASSEDDONE
April 29, 2014 at 5:46 pm #558178
AnonymousInactiveI am not understanding this question on my Becker MCQ's. Chapter over Economics.
If the elasticity of demand for a normal good is estimated to be 1.5, then a 10% reduction in its price would cause:
a. Demand to decrease by 10%.
b. Total revenue to fall by 15%.
c. Quantity demanded to rise by 15%.
d. Total revenue to fall by 10%.
Explanation
Choice “c” is correct. The elasticity of demand is calculated as:
% change in demand
% change in price
If the elasticity of demand is 1.5 (assumed to be the absolute value, as the elasticity of demand for a normal good is always negative), then a 10% price reduction would cause an increase in the quantity demanded by 15% (a ratio of 15 to 10 or 1.5).
Choices “d”, “b”, and “a” are incorrect, per explanation above.
Can someone explain this calculation in a different way for me? Thank you!!
April 29, 2014 at 5:56 pm #558179
NYCaccountantParticipantThe change in quantity demanded would be 1.5 times the change in price. Thats basically what that means. Because the price charged fell, the quantity demanded would rise. A price drop of 10%, would equate to a 15% increase in quantity demanded. 10% *1.5= 15%
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.April 29, 2014 at 6:15 pm #558180
AnonymousInactiveNYCaccountant – Thank you! This helps a lot.
April 29, 2014 at 7:19 pm #558181
jeffKeymasterApril 29, 2014 at 10:15 pm #558182
jeffKeymasterApril 30, 2014 at 12:39 am #558183
AnonymousInactiveIs it weird that I kind of like cost accounting?
April 30, 2014 at 1:59 am #558184
AnonymousInactiveYes.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] BEC Study Group 2014 - Page 21’ is closed to new replies.
