- This topic has 625 replies, 90 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
MrsBing.
-
CreatorTopic
-
February 6, 2014 at 9:59 pm #183480
-
AuthorReplies
-
March 31, 2014 at 2:18 am #558048
AnonymousInactiveMarch 31, 2014 at 2:49 am #558049
accountabergsParticipantI am having a hard time wrapping my mind around these 2 problems concerning DCF and depreciation/tax
1)Garter Company anticipates buying a $250,000 piece of equipment that will cost $20,000 to install, have a nine-year useful life, and generate $90,000 per year in pre tax cash flows. Assuming a 30 percent tax rate, what is the payback period for this investment in years?
3.75
3.47
3.00
4.50
In this one, you add the 20,000 to the 250,000 and divide it by the 9 years and *(1-t) for the tax benefit depreciation. But in this next one you only include the initial investment….
Barclay Corporation invested $600,000 in a capital project, including $40,000 in installation charges. The project had a useful life of 12 years with no salvage value and generated cash flows of $150,000 each year. Assuming a 30% tax rate and straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, Barclay’s after-tax cash flows per year would have been equal to:
$120,000
$150,000
$105,000
$140,000
In this one, you only use the initial investment of 600,000 and divide by 12 rather than adding the 40,000 installation charges.
In both problems there are installation charges. One includes it for depreciation, the other doesn't. Is it because one question asks for the payback period and the other asks for the cash flows? Please help
Passed in 2014
FAR- (5/27) 88
REG- (2/20) 70, Rematch: (7/2)83
BEC- (4/2) 85
AUD- (4/24) 87Using Becker live classes and online materials
"if you get confused, listen to the music play"
March 31, 2014 at 4:06 am #558050
accountabergsParticipantShoot, I just realized my problem!
Barclay Corporation invested $600,000 in a capital project, “INCLUDING” $40,000 in installation charges.
Goes to show how important reading the question is….
Passed in 2014
FAR- (5/27) 88
REG- (2/20) 70, Rematch: (7/2)83
BEC- (4/2) 85
AUD- (4/24) 87Using Becker live classes and online materials
"if you get confused, listen to the music play"
March 31, 2014 at 3:10 pm #558051
AnonymousInactiveMarch 31, 2014 at 3:19 pm #558052
NYCaccountantParticipant@MJP44 The purchasing department could buy cheap materials, which means you might require more materials to produce a single unit. Lack of quality normally means reduced cost but inferior product. You're direct material price variance would be favorable but the efficiency variance would suck.
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.March 31, 2014 at 3:46 pm #558053
mratnerMemberGood Luck to all taking the test this week!!! I will be enduring my first exam BEC on 04/07/2014. Wish everyone the best of luck as testing opens tomorrow!!
BEC 4/7/2014
FAR 5/28/2014
AUD Sometime in Beg. of July
REG Sometime in End of AugustApril 1, 2014 at 1:34 am #558054
JMCAPASSOMemberAny advice for me would be great. I have been using Becker. Does the NINJA theory work? I am thinking about buying notes and maybe audio. I am taking BEC at end of May. I need to get one under my belt!!!!
FAR 72
AUD 49
REG 70
BEC May 2014
AUD - 49, 66, 72, 77!!
FAR - 72, 73, 78
BEC - 70, 74, 79, I'm DONE!!!!!!
REG - 70, 76!!!! FIRST PASSDon’t faint in the day of adversity. Remember your ABCs—Adversity Builds Character!!! - Andy Andrews
April 1, 2014 at 3:50 pm #558055
RedSoxFan77MemberRight now I am seriously hating variable versus full cost accounting. I understand the concept with the gaap reporting and fixed costs but I still struggle with the Wiley questions. One thing that's helpful is with full cost, if the ending inventory is higher, then net income is higher versus variable.
FAR 75
AUD 74, 82
REG 58, 74, 83
BEC 68, 75
Licensed 7.1.14!!!April 1, 2014 at 5:37 pm #558056
jeffKeymasterApril 2, 2014 at 3:49 pm #558057
mjp44MemberQuick question regarding NPV/IRR to reject or not reject a project…
Obviously, if NPV is positive you accept project and if negative you reject..but what if NPV=0? My thinking is if NPV=0 you would refer to the IRR. If NPV=0 and the IRR is above the desired hurdle rate you accept project and if less than the hurdle rate you reject the project. Does this sound accurate?
FAR- PASSED (11/13)
REG- PASSED (2/14)
BEC- PASSED (5/14)
AUD- PASSED (8/14)If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.
April 2, 2014 at 5:34 pm #558058
NYCaccountantParticipantI believe an NPV being zero means your basically indifferent. It does not matter if you take the project If NPV equals zero than the IRR is the cost of capital if you think about it. Let me know if anyone disagrees with my assessment. Could be wrong, but don't think so.
NPV>1 (cost of capital) IRR>Market Rate for similar investment ((Hurdle Rate)
NPV<1 (Cost of capital) IRR<Market rate market rate for similar investment (Hurdle Rate)
NPV=0 (Cost of capital) IRR=Market rate for similar investment
FAR - 93
REG - 87
BEC - 84!!!!
AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.April 3, 2014 at 3:18 pm #558059
jeffKeymasterApril 3, 2014 at 7:23 pm #558060
mel_hamnationMemberQuestion – doing test bank questions and ran across calculating variable overhead and what item would be in the denominator. My Ninja notes state VOH is calculated by dividing the estimated activity by the actual activity; however, the question stated to use estimated activity. What am I missing? Thanks!
REG - 78 (1/13)
BEC - 82 (4/14)
FAR - 87 (5/14)
AUD - 92 (5/14)April 4, 2014 at 3:49 pm #558061
RedSoxFan77Membermel_hamnation, I struggled with that too. You don't have an ‘actual' activity level at that point you're calculating the predetermined VOH. So both numerator and denominator are estimated numbers because you don't have the actual numbers. estimated variable OH costs/estimated activity level.
I don't know why they say ‘estimated actual activity level'. They're contradicting terms so that threw me off.
FAR 75
AUD 74, 82
REG 58, 74, 83
BEC 68, 75
Licensed 7.1.14!!!April 5, 2014 at 12:11 am #558062
AnonymousInactiveNothing like getting down with my good friend E. Khan (Econ) on a Friday night…lmao
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘[Q2] BEC Study Group 2014 - Page 13’ is closed to new replies.
