- This topic has 1,961 replies, 145 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
Windel.
-
CreatorTopic
-
August 30, 2014 at 3:34 pm #188295
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
September 3, 2014 at 4:25 pm #621160
playonwardsMemberHey all…
I took Audit on August 29th and it was a strange animal. I would predict that I'll be studying for this one again. Was just going to throw in my 2 cents about the exam.
For one, I used Becker and did EVERYTHING and did it all pretty well. Studied two chapters per week then had 10 days to review. There wasn't a section of the book that I couldn't get at least a 70%, generally closer to 80-90%, on regarding practice tests. I also hand-wrote notes from the book on basically anything they highlighted or had you underscore/write. I used this same strategy for FAR when I took it in July and I got a 92 on that exam.
Taking this exam was a frustrating experience. There was A LOT of material on the MC portion of the exam that I felt Becker did not emphasize or cover at all. Additionally, maybe 50% of my MC questions were from the same chapter in Becker, and not necessarily the one you'd think. Obviously can't say which, but overall I was blown away by the MC section in terms of how “off” Becker was regarding what to study.
The Sims were either so easy I could've done them after taking my Audit class in college or unnecessarily complicated due to the vague instructions. I obviously don't have my score yet but I'm certain my performance on the MC will drag my score dangerously close to a 75, if not below. There's another thread here where others emphasize the surprising difficulty of the exams first testlet of MC questions, so I don't believe it was just my exam.
My point of this post is, don't take this exam lightly. I had heard it was the easiest, maybe on the level of BEC. I didn't let that effect my studying though and I still got hammered by the MC. Good luck!
FAR- 92 (7/25/2014)
AUD- 93 (8/30/2014)
REG- 93 (10/10/2014)
BEC- 91 (11/10/2014)Using Becker self-study only. Working full-time.
September 3, 2014 at 4:44 pm #621994
kappa1032Participant@playonwards – thanks for your input! I'll make sure not to take this one lightly. What do you think worked best in your eyes to retain all the info? Taking notes or doing lots of MCQ?
FAR - 81
REG - 74, 87
AUD - 88
BEC - 88Finally.
“The only guarantee for failure is to stop trying”
― John C. MaxwellSeptember 3, 2014 at 4:44 pm #621162
kappa1032Participant@playonwards – thanks for your input! I'll make sure not to take this one lightly. What do you think worked best in your eyes to retain all the info? Taking notes or doing lots of MCQ?
FAR - 81
REG - 74, 87
AUD - 88
BEC - 88Finally.
“The only guarantee for failure is to stop trying”
― John C. MaxwellSeptember 4, 2014 at 3:06 am #621164
AnonymousInactiveWhat is the difference if any between emphasis of matter and other matter reports?
September 4, 2014 at 3:06 am #621995
AnonymousInactiveWhat is the difference if any between emphasis of matter and other matter reports?
September 4, 2014 at 2:07 pm #621166
CSmith242Participant@CPAHOPEFULL11
When conducting the audit of a private company, there is no requirement to express an opinion on the internal controls. But when auditing a public (PCAOB) company you are required to express an opinion on the internal controls. Now when is comes to Attestation Engagements it depends on the engagement. For a review of financial statements you provide negative assurance with a statement saying that you are unaware of any material modifications needed to have the financial statements be in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework, therefore you are not required to express an opinion. When it comes to an examination there are many variations of an examination and what the engagement calls for. For instance, the engagement may be to examine the internal controls over financial reporting of a company, if that is the case then you must express an opinion as to whether the controls are operating effectively.. here are a fee links that could be really helpful.
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AT-00501.pdf
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/CompilationReview/DownloadableDocuments/AR-00090.pdf
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AT-00101.pdf
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AT-00201.pdf
September 4, 2014 at 2:07 pm #621996
CSmith242Participant@CPAHOPEFULL11
When conducting the audit of a private company, there is no requirement to express an opinion on the internal controls. But when auditing a public (PCAOB) company you are required to express an opinion on the internal controls. Now when is comes to Attestation Engagements it depends on the engagement. For a review of financial statements you provide negative assurance with a statement saying that you are unaware of any material modifications needed to have the financial statements be in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework, therefore you are not required to express an opinion. When it comes to an examination there are many variations of an examination and what the engagement calls for. For instance, the engagement may be to examine the internal controls over financial reporting of a company, if that is the case then you must express an opinion as to whether the controls are operating effectively.. here are a fee links that could be really helpful.
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AT-00501.pdf
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/CompilationReview/DownloadableDocuments/AR-00090.pdf
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AT-00101.pdf
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AT-00201.pdf
September 4, 2014 at 2:13 pm #621168
CSmith242ParticipantThis talks about emphasis of matter and other matters paragraph
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AU-C-00706.pdf
September 4, 2014 at 2:13 pm #621997
CSmith242ParticipantThis talks about emphasis of matter and other matters paragraph
https://www.aicpa.org/Research/Standards/AuditAttest/DownloadableDocuments/AU-C-00706.pdf
September 4, 2014 at 3:52 pm #621998
AnonymousInactiveThanks I'll check the link out in a little bit.
So even in examination attestations you provide an opinion on ICFR? I thought that was only for public companies?
September 4, 2014 at 3:52 pm #621170
AnonymousInactiveThanks I'll check the link out in a little bit.
So even in examination attestations you provide an opinion on ICFR? I thought that was only for public companies?
September 4, 2014 at 7:07 pm #621172
AnonymousInactiveQuestion!
Days Sales in Accounts Receivable = Average net receivables / net credit sales
Net credit sale is for the Current year only? I read somewhere its says “Daily net credit sales” .. can anyone please explain
ThQ
September 4, 2014 at 7:07 pm #621999
AnonymousInactiveQuestion!
Days Sales in Accounts Receivable = Average net receivables / net credit sales
Net credit sale is for the Current year only? I read somewhere its says “Daily net credit sales” .. can anyone please explain
ThQ
September 4, 2014 at 7:43 pm #621174
AnonymousInactiveYeah, net credit sales is for only the current year while the receivables are averaged out.
September 4, 2014 at 7:43 pm #622000
AnonymousInactiveYeah, net credit sales is for only the current year while the receivables are averaged out.
-
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q4 2014 - Page 6’ is closed to new replies.
