AUD Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 46

Viewing 15 replies - 676 through 690 (of 1,162 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #650464
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Sorry for not having thoughts together

    prospective financial statements are ones where you compile a financial statement assuming x, y, and z would happen right?

    Pro Forma is assuming that something happened a while ago when in reality it didnt?

    Projection is basically trying to create an accurate forecast of a financial statement?

    Is pro forma also SSAE?

    #650465
    uokoro
    Member

    Thanks guys for all the help. special thanks to Sunni,ARCPA2B, Martin and CTM

    AUD - 83
    FAR - 77
    BEC - TBD
    REG - TBD

    This too shall Pass

    #650466
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Can someone explain AS 17 for me and what changes in regards to question/answers

    If I am understanding it correctly it means supplementary information is to be audited now instead of limited procedures?

    #650467
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    AS-17 Introduction… “The Board is adopting Auditing Standard No. 17, Auditing Supplemental

    Information Accompanying Audited Financial Statements (the “standard”). The standard

    sets forth the auditor's responsibilities when the auditor of the financial statements is

    engaged to perform audit procedures and report on whether supplemental information

    accompanying the financial statements is fairly stated, in all material respects, in

    relation to the financial statements as a whole. The standard supersedes AU sec. 551,

    Reporting on Information Accompanying the Basic Financial Statements in AuditorSubmitted

    Documents. The Board also is amending certain other related PCAOB

    auditing standards.”

    https://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket036/PCAOB_Release_2013_008.pdf

    My interpretation… when auditing financial statements AS-17 states the auditor should apply certain audit procedures for the financial statements “simultaneously” to the supplementary information to increase efficiency… As far as the report on the “S.I.” goes, I think it is mainly for the auditor to ensure that the “S.I.” is consistent with the financial statements – due to the “S.I.” being an important part of the financial statements. Also, unless I'm misunderstanding – when supplementary information presented with financial statements departs from GAAP or is inconsistent with requirements the auditor would add an emphasis of matter paragraph.

    Also, Sunni – your question earlier about “Why can an attest engagement to examine and report on nonissuers internal control be distributed but an auditors report on significant deficiencies has to be restricted?” I think this has to do a lot with the users understanding of the report and its implications. I believe reports on significant deficiencies are always addressed to client management with a disclaimer. The auditors report on internal control includes written communication over identified significant deficiencies and material weaknesses but that is not the main purpose of the report. There is a simulation in the Becker homework (A5 – Sim3) similar to this discussion.

    #650469
    Martin
    Participant

    Have you guys practiced the 2013 and 2014 AICPA released questions? I think there are about 50 for each year. Are they too easy?

    Through God all things can happen!

    “You never fail until you stop trying.”
    ― Albert Einstein
    When I was young, I used to admire intelligent people;as I grow older, I admire kind people.
    “Just keep swimming, just keep swimming.”

    FAR= 72-84
    Audit= 73-82
    BEC= 74-75
    Reg=77

    #650470
    tami3492
    Participant

    I did the 2013 ones and I only missed 2, I thought they were pretty easy. I will probably do the 2014 ones sometime this week.

    FAR 7/8/14 - 88 - Becker live course
    REG 10/14/14 - 82 - Becker live course, Ninja notes and audio
    BEC 11/25/14 - 88 - Becker live course, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions
    AUD 2/3/15 - 94 - Becker self study, Ninja audio, Wiley book for extra questions

    #650471
    Martin
    Participant

    tami, I got 90 on both so I guess there are not a good measurement. I have been getting around 85 on WTB and Beckers simulations. When I do the ninja mc, I get from 70 to 75,so it seems that ninjas questions are harder than WTB.

    Through God all things can happen!

    “You never fail until you stop trying.”
    ― Albert Einstein
    When I was young, I used to admire intelligent people;as I grow older, I admire kind people.
    “Just keep swimming, just keep swimming.”

    FAR= 72-84
    Audit= 73-82
    BEC= 74-75
    Reg=77

    #650472
    ruggercpa2b
    Participant

    I remember seeing at least 3 or 4 questions that were word for word from the AICPA released questions. They are definitely worth looking over.

    AUD - 73, 72 retake 7/2/2016
    BEC - 8/20/2016
    REG - TBD
    FAR - TBD

    I am so ready for this nightmare to be over. Been at this way too long.

    #650473
    Troblin
    Participant

    Can someone provide a link to the 2013 and 2014 AICPA audit questions?

    FAR: 85(11/22/2014) - Becker(full)/Ninja MCQ (5 day cram)
    AUD: 79 (2/1/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja Notes
    REG: 84(4/19/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja Notes
    BEC: 83 (7/13/2015) -Becker/Ninja MCQ/Ninja Notes

    Date I Got My Life Back!: 8/4/2015 🙂

    #650474
    ruggercpa2b
    Participant

    I know Becker has them posted if you have Becker, that is where I got mine from. I am not sure if those are accessible to people who do not have Becker. You may have to do some digging on google or try searching on the forum. I just did a search of the AICPA released questions and a lot of links came up. I do not really want to click on any because I am on my work computer. You may have to do some digging on the interweb.

    AUD - 73, 72 retake 7/2/2016
    BEC - 8/20/2016
    REG - TBD
    FAR - TBD

    I am so ready for this nightmare to be over. Been at this way too long.

    #650475
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Is anyone else using Becker materials for AUD review? Is Gearty the only lecturer in the videos for all of AUD? I'm on A3 and I'm ready for someone different! Never thought I'd say this but what' up with OLINTO?!

    #650476
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @CTM- No there is another guy (Peter something or other) that does sections 4 and 5.

    For everyone else- quick question about the research simulation- do you get partial credit if you get part of it correct. For example, I just did a practice Sim that was AU-C A13, and I selected something very close (12 or something like that). Do I get partial credit for that or is it counted completely wrong? Or is this something that is unknown?

    Thanks!

    #650477
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I've been told that it is all or nothing for a research sim. If you don't get everything correct you don't get any credit. Again, that's just what I've been told on this forum.

    #650478
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @CTM – when you get to the other AUD lecturer (Brown?) get ready for a nap, the guy is the worst to listen to. (IMO)

    #650479
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Wonderful. I'm already fighting to stay awake through these things much less trying to actively listen.

Viewing 15 replies - 676 through 690 (of 1,162 total)
  • The topic ‘AUD Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 46’ is closed to new replies.