Going through notes and this topic seems to cause me some confusion so hoping someone sees the light and can help me understand this…
Incorrect acceptance = efficient but not effective.
Incorrect rejection = effective but not efficient.
How/why would an incorrect rejection be effective?
My thoughts are; an incorrect rejection would lead to more through testing as you are falsely assessing the risk too high thus making your end result more effective and lowering the audits efficiency. Alternatively, incorrect acceptance leads to a lower assessment of risk thus decreasing the amount of work performed increasing the efficiency of the audit but decreasing the effectiveness of the work.
So, incorrect rejection is not effective itself, but impacts the effectiveness of the audit?
Am I looking at this correctly?