[Q3] AUD Study Group 2014 - Page 43

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 1,389 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #592778
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Azer14

    The mnemonic provided by Becker is for non-issuer reports.

    If you look at A5, they go over integrated audits of issuers (which are required), and include the requirement of reporting on the financial statements + operating effectiveness of internal control.

    #592779
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Gabe and @riceperson

    I think you can only give an adverse opinion when there is a material weakness present, not a qualified opinion.

    For a scope limit, I suppose you would rule out the qualified opinion, so you would only be left with a disclaimer.

    #592780
    mjp44
    Member

    I believe that a scope limitation is basically saying that the auditor cannot perform the audit because he/she is lacking very material/pervasive amounts of sufficient evidence. In this case, you always disclaim an opinion. Likewise, if the auditor is lacking a material amount of sufficient evidence, this is not grounds for a scope limitation and can still perform the audit, therefore issue an adverse opinion.

    Please correct me if i am wrong.

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #592781
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    I'm going with disclaimer because it was previously communicated to management and if I can't determine if it still exists, it's most likely because management is refusing to cooperate with me, which is a automatically a disclaimer of opinion because it's a client imposed restriction.

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #592782
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Going to take my exam now…WISH ME LUCK!

    #592783
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Which of the following statements is correct concerning materiality in a financial statement audit?

    a. If the materiality amount used in evaluating audit findings increases from the amount used in planning, the auditor should apply additional substantive tests.

    b. The auditor's materiality judgments generally involve quantitative, but not qualitative, considerations.

    c. Analytical procedures performed during an audit's review stage usually decrease materiality levels.

    d. Materiality levels are generally considered in terms of the smallest aggregate level of misstatement that could be considered material to any one of the financial statements.

    Explanation

    Choice “d” is correct. Because the financial statements are interrelated, materiality levels are generally considered in terms of the smallest level of misstatement that could be material to any one of the financial statements.

    Choice “c” is incorrect. Analytical procedures are performed during an audit's review stage to evaluate the overall financial statement presentation and to assess the conclusions reached. They generally would not result in a change in materiality levels.

    Choice “a” is incorrect. If the materiality amount used in evaluating audit findings increases from the amount used in planning, the auditor should consider whether the audit plan needs to be modified. Typically, an increase in materiality levels would result in a decrease in audit risk, which would result in less substantive testing, not more.

    Choice “b” is incorrect. Qualitative considerations may lead to situations in which misstatements that do not exceed materiality limits are still likely to influence the economic decisions of users. In such cases, an otherwise immaterial misstatement is deemed to be material.

    D is the correct answer, and I understand why. But, I would like to know more about the explanation for choice A. If materiality increases, the audit risk decreases and less substantive testing is required. I thought that if materiality increases, you would have to test more.

    #592784
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Good luck, arushi!!

    #592785
    mjp44
    Member

    @cindywindy…A is incorrect because it is saying materiality “levels” which is basically the threshold a company sets at determining if something is material or not. So if it gets set at a higher level the chance of something material going missed would go down and therefore, fewer substantive measures are needed.

    FAR- PASSED (11/13)
    REG- PASSED (2/14)
    BEC- PASSED (5/14)
    AUD- PASSED (8/14)

    If it's important to you, you will find a way. If it isn't, you will find an excuse.

    #592786
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks, mjp44!

    #592787
    NYCaccountant
    Participant

    @MJP I would not think it's the chance of something being missed, I would think it would be the chance of something that is going to be material decreasing. is this correct?

    FAR - 93
    REG - 87
    BEC - 84!!!!
    AUD - 99!!!!!! CPA exam complete.

    #592788
    stephk919
    Participant

    Just took AUD, that was brutal! Could go either way… first testlet – Medium, Second – Hard , Third – Medium/Hard…. I don't even know. And for the simulations, I don't want to talk about it!

    I wish I Hadn't lost this part back in March

    Good Luck everyone… now the wait begins.

    AUD - 83!! July 2012 (Expired), July 8 2014... waiting and waiting...
    REG - October/November 2014
    FAR - Late August 2014
    BEC - 82 !!! Nov. 2013

    Using Becker Self Study and Wiley Test Bank

    #592789
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Took AUD today….while a lot of it was straight from the review material, there were many questions which totally took me by surprise and had me going…whattttt? Even after finishing three different material sources. Their capacity to confuse is tremendous. The SIMs actually seemed simpler in comparison. Research SIMs were straightforward and a couple other SIMs tested accounting knowledge more than auditing knowledge. Knowing your FAR (adjusting entries) is definitely a plus point. Finished over an hour early and am not sure whether that is a good thing or bad!!! Will know in August.

    For everybody giving their AUD exams, all the best!

    #592790
    iddyrashy
    Member

    @cindy materiality increase means auditor accepting larger amount of of misstatement, means auditor accept more risk then the sample size is always small means auditor test less. You remember tolerable misstatement have an inverse relationship with sample size. So, you accept larger materiality then you will reduce substantive testing.

    AUD 89 (07/06/14)
    REG 83 (08/27/2015)
    FAR 78 (04/27/2015)
    BEC 75 (11/13/2015)

    TEXAS 2016

    #592791
    riceperson
    Participant

    @arushi, mjp, & nyc

    Thanks for the insight. I think I found it in Roger's notes:

    “Scope Limitations will often result in a qualified opinion when auditor unable to obtain sufficient, appropriate…. if the undetected misstatement is not pervasive. If on the other hand possible affects could be material and pervasive the auditor will issue a Disclaimer.”

    Something tells me because this was an issue on the py statement and the item was material, then it can only be disclaimer.

    FAR 69, 83
    AUD 85
    BEC 80
    REG 82
    FINISHED

    #592792
    riceperson
    Participant

    @Alpa congratulations hopefully it's a pass!

    I must admit I'm shooting myself for not taking this after FAR as some of the review questions have taken me a bit by surprise dealing with Derivatives and Inventory, but I think the last week I'll look over the old FAR material to see if it can help me marginally.

    FAR 69, 83
    AUD 85
    BEC 80
    REG 82
    FINISHED

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 1,389 total)
  • The topic ‘[Q3] AUD Study Group 2014 - Page 43’ is closed to new replies.