- This topic has 1,482 replies, 126 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 10 months ago by tmjcpa.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 6:25 pm #1396511jeffKeymaster
Welcome to the Q1 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 21, 2017 at 3:10 pm #1494135cpaMD86Participant
Just a thought…
Has anyone worked on the SIM below? I use and came across it in Roger's IPQ. This problem is ridiculously long…too long for 15 minute budget (at least for me). These are the types of SIMS that worry me. There are so many details and calculations that cause me to scramble.
Cedar Creek Corporation (Cedar), incorporated in 1996, is an accrual basis, calendar-year entity. In 2000, it suffered a casualty loss, which caused a net operating loss (NOL) in that year. Cedar has furnished the first page of its 2000 tax return to support this NOL. Cedar carried the NOL back and has been slowly using the NOL to offset its taxable income in subsequent years. Cedar also incurred a capital loss on the sale of stock in 2013, none of which it has yet been able to offset with capital gains and, thus, has been carrying it forward along with its NOL. Pertinent 2015 tax return forms and worksheets have been provided for your review.
Cedar is interested in planning for a few very important transactions to occur over the period from 2016 through 2018. Cedar purchased for $1 million a new manufacturing building in November 2015 and wants to acquire new manufacturing equipment in 2016 (i.e., this year) for this building. The cost of the new equipment will be $400,000. The payments for the building are $300,000 in 2016 and 2017 and the remainder in 2018. To finance these new acquisitions, Cedar is selling its old equipment and old manufacturing building. Cedar will also sell some of its investments in GHI stock to supplement the cash required for the new assets. By the end of 2018, Cedar wants all of the investment in GHI sold. Cedar estimates that it will have net taxable income (and cash flow) from operations of $80,000 for the years of 2016 through 2018. This income (cash flow) is before considering the cash flows and taxable income resulting from the two planning options described below. Other than the capital gains resulting from the options, Cedar does not expect to have any other capital gains or losses over the three years. To the extent possible, Cedar would like to maximize its use of its carryforwards and its total cash flows. Cedar’s after-tax rate of return is 5%.
The options are as follows:
Option 1: Sell its old equipment in 2016 and its old manufacturing building in 2017. With this option, it would need to sell all of its investment in GHI stock in 2016 in order to have the cash necessary for 2016. Cedar bought 7,200 shares of GHI in 2013 for $50 per share. The 2016 selling price for GHI is $56 per share.
Option 2: Sell its old manufacturing building in 2016 and its equipment in 2017. With this option, it would sell 3,240 GHI shares in 2016 and 3,960 in 2018 in order to have the cash necessary for 2016 – 2018. Cedar bought 7,200 shares of GHI in 2013 for $50 per share. The 2016 selling price for GHI is $56 per share, and in 2018 the price per share is expected to be $60.
FAR: 9/3
February 21, 2017 at 10:43 pm #1494457isocelesParticipant@QueenCPA It took me a little bit to get comfortable with them during the test. However, I think I did really well on them. My biggest piece of advice is to make sure you have enough time to do them. I was very disciplined during the test in terms of time management. I gave my self no more than 30 minutes per MCQ and it left me with 90 minutes for sims. 15 minutes per sim was plenty of time, especially considering 1 was a research one. To be honest, I did 1 simulation (not one set of six, just one) in my studying. I found that during the test they were just like one long MCQ. However, if you have the time, I would definitely recommend doing some in preparation.
February 21, 2017 at 11:26 pm #1494486CPYayParticipant@CPA788
Thanks! I'll have to go back and review the basis calculations for both entities and individuals since I seem to be mixing up the two.
February 22, 2017 at 2:05 am #1494550CPYayParticipantI'm not entirely sure, but I read somewhere that some of Roger's questions are not from actual exam's, but are rather created by him and his staff to assist in teaching/repeating the concepts. It's possible that question is something that's all-encompassing to help you associate multiple concepts.
Again though… I don't know if that's true. I'd like to think so haha.
February 22, 2017 at 6:34 am #1494576cpaMD86Participant@CPYay
Well…that's nice of them lol. I didn't study SIMs for the other sections, so I wasn't used to this. I think I've heard the same. Hopefully, there's nothing this long on the exam.
FAR: 9/3
February 22, 2017 at 11:57 am #1494780CPYayParticipantDo you know if the Ninja SIMS are actual exam questions? I've been trying some of them and noticed that, more often than not, a lot of the information given in the problem has no purpose.
For example, a question might say an individual taxpayer with x AGI had three kids, a rental property, a sole proprietorship, and the following deductions blah blah…
Then it has a few boxes and says to determine if the following stock sales are L/T or S/T gains or losses.. Literally an entire paragraph of information had no purpose for the question.
I doubt that's how the exam will provide questions (given what I've had on FAR and AUD)… but I'd love for the REG TBS questions to be this way so I can skip chunks of information haha.
February 22, 2017 at 12:02 pm #1494786cpaMD86ParticipantI want to say that Jeff does acknowledge them as being AICPA questions. I find myself skimming through it, and looking at the answer requirements then going back and reading everything again lol.
On another note, some of the Ninja SIMs use the same scenario for various questions. So, you might be getting all of that detail in ‘x' question, but you might not need all of it for this particular question. Question ‘x2' might ask for something else…
What I'd like to know is if the format and/or questions correlate to what is currently presented in the exam. Some of the Roger SIMs are ridiculously long in both detail and answers (like yesterday's example). Some have mentioned that the Ninja SIMs are weak for prep, and that the actual exam questions can be crazy. So I don't know what to expect..!
FAR: 9/3
February 22, 2017 at 12:12 pm #1494790RE2PECTParticipantI don't think Ninja's sims are representative of what's on the actual exam. I never did them all, but many of them just had you plug in numbers on a tax form. Roger's are a little better and he has a few DRS, which is nice. I've been using Gleim and I feel like they have the best sims and are as close to the exam as you'll get.
FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
AUD: 73, 81
BEC: 71, retake 8/29
REG:February 22, 2017 at 12:16 pm #1494799cpaMD86ParticipantI've been working on the Ninja Partnership and Corp questions. They're very reasonable and doable. The Roger ones were overwhelming just b/c it seems he has exhibits in every question. Still planning to look at both.
For the actual exam, on research, is the format presented in both IRC 2 and 3?
FAR: 9/3
February 22, 2017 at 12:36 pm #1494828RE2PECTParticipant@cpaMD86- Not sure what you mean by IRC 2 and 3. Have you tried the AICPA sample exam?
I think it's better to see the overwhelming sims and at least try them once. It's better to be prepared for the worst than do ones that you feel are easy and then get blindsided on the exam. I know there's many people on here that are firm believers of not practicing sims, but I feel that they test your knowledge in a different way than doing countless mcq's.
FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
AUD: 73, 81
BEC: 71, retake 8/29
REG:February 22, 2017 at 12:40 pm #1494835CPYayParticipantI don't make an effort to do a bunch of SIMS, but I do like to try some every once in a while to see if I'm understanding the concepts. I like that the SIMS force you to calculate without having four options in front of you (like MCQs).
February 22, 2017 at 12:44 pm #1494837cpaMD86ParticipantI never practiced SIMs on past exams, but I've taken the advice of others to look over them for REG.
Roger's research questions have two options to identify the IRC Code. IRC-2 and IRC-3. The latter also identifies the paragraph AND the section. I did do the practice exam and did not see that there, so it may be a new exam change…FAR: 9/3
February 22, 2017 at 12:49 pm #1494844RE2PECTParticipant@cpaMD86- I don't do Roger's research questions since he doesn't have an AL to search through. I've never seen that before.
FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
AUD: 73, 81
BEC: 71, retake 8/29
REG:February 22, 2017 at 9:25 pm #1495372abigParticipantJust took REG today, walked out very upset. I dont think I passed even though I felt confident going in.
I realized some dumb mistakes I made that easily could be the difference in a passing score or not.
=/
February 22, 2017 at 9:44 pm #1495387jack yassaParticipantI took mine yesterday, i didn't feel good either.Where did you studied from?
And what's your plan? -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 91’ is closed to new replies.