REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 67

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1396511
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q1 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,482 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1451501
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Also I have another question if I have exactly full 20 days to take REG exam on March 10th is it enough to study everything?

    #1451579
    Tardis_Wobble
    Participant

    @re2pect – yeah I think I need to have a slightly better grasp on the B-Law section before I take it.

    And yes they do! The test bank, sims, and the full course even. It's been awesome.

    FAR - 76 - [4]
    BEC - 71, 73, September 9 2016
    AUD - July 28 2016
    REG - October 2016

    Black coffee, stress, and cottage cheese pancakes!

    #1451622
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    Here's an easy one for people to help me on.

    I missed a question dealing with how much loss each member of an LLC will assume. The question states losses are allocated based off the “Unlimited Limited Liability Company Act”. I thought LLC's by default allocated by member contribution and partnerships allocated based on # of members?

    The answer says when terms are silent as to how to allocated profits/loss you allocate an LLC based on the ULLCA by headcount? I could probably look this up as easy as I can typing this but I'm being lazy ;).

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1451624
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    @Tardis_Wobble- Wow that's great to know! I'll probably need my wife to sign up since they already have me on record lol. I would make sure you know ethics and professional responsibilities really well. It's not a lot of material and makes up almost 20% of the exam. You're going to notice almost every other question is blaw or ethics since you're most likely not going to get a sim on either topic.

    @dtatham10- I usually assume that losses are shared equally among the members if it wasn't stated otherwise in the agreement.

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #1451688
    QueenCPA
    Participant

    I need help!

    lt Partnership, a cash basis calendar year entity, began business on October 1, Year 1. Alt incurred and paid the following in Year 1:
    Legal fees to prepare the partnership agreement $ 23,000
    Accounting fees to prepare the representations in offering materials 15,000
    Alt elected to amortize costs. What was the maximum amount that Alt could deduct on the Year 1 partnership return?
    a. $0
    b. $5,300
    c. $300
    d. $4,600
    Explanation
    Choice “b” is correct. Eligible expenditures up to $5,000 can be deducted in the first year (with overall limitations). Additional expenditures are amortized over 180 months beginning with the date they begin business. Legal fees to prepare the partnership agreement ($23,000) are eligible for this treatment, but sales and promotional expenses ($15,000) are not deductible or amortizable. – where did sales and promo come from, all is see is accounting fees and legal fees – some one help!

    The first year deduction is calculated as follows:
    23,000
    (5,000)
    immediate deduction

    18,000 /
    180 months = $100 per month x 3 = 300 + 5,000 = $5,300

    #1451696
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @queen haha, I would say that explanation is a typo. The answer is correct though. Expenses incurred to prepare offering materials do not qualify for the organization expense deductions. Therefore, only the legal fees of 23k are eligible. The 23k is under 50k, so no need to worry about the 5k phaseout rule. $5k is immediately deducted and the remaining 18k are amortized over 180 months. Not sure you were asking for a explanation on how to get to the $5,300 but thought I would add anyway!

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1451697
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @re2pect, thanks I'll just go with that logic!

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1451711
    norseman88
    Participant

    Death to REG SIMS! Sickening how people will fail this exam because instructions are not clear, candidate answers a question correctly, just in a different way than the solution.

    #1451715
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    @dtatham10- I'm not sure it's the right logic, but that's what I use when I see one of those questions lol.

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #1451741
    jordancole
    Participant

    @QUEENCPA

    It's considered a selling expense because of how it's worded–very unfairly tricky. The accounting fees are associated with preparing materials before the sale to entice partners into joining. It works the same as an advertising/marketing selling expense. Re-analyze the term “representations in offering materials” and you might better understand. The only fees that are able to be amortized are those that relate to the absolute direct organization of the partnership.

    #1451754
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    I've been working through Gleim questions I haven't answered correctly the last couple days and I'm getting crushed! It feels like I haven't even studied at all for this exam lol. I finally had my overall average over 70% and now it's back to 69 smh.

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #1451756
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @queen ok that makes sense. I always just knew expenses related to the offering are not amortized. Clears the air more that they are considered “selling expenses” rather then me just using my current logic.



    @re2pect
    yeah I know how you feel. I did some estate gleim mcq's yesterday and finished in the 70's somewhere. The ones I got right were repeats from becker and most the new material I missed. It's definitely disheartening but it's Gleim so it's to be expected lol.

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1451768
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    @dtatham10- So you finally caved in and started doing Gleim questions? lol. I try not letting it get to me because a lot of the ones I never answered correct are harder than what will be on the exam.

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #1451774
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    haha yeah! @re2pect I felt like I wasn't getting the full picture of estate tax so I rattled off the 26 or so questions Gleim had. Helped a little bit but there were a couple of the notorious confusing Gleim questions. Tried not to let it kill my confidence too much.

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1451777
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    just realized it was @jordancole who posted the selling expense explanation! Thanks for clarifying that! And, on a side note, nice score on FAR!

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

Viewing 15 replies - 991 through 1,005 (of 1,482 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 67’ is closed to new replies.