REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 48

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1396511
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q1 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 706 through 720 (of 1,482 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1442663
    aatoural
    Participant

    @dtat – for the first SIM second question is not exchange of like-kind, the first one is. The second one he just bought a building many years ago and then sold it. The trick of the qustion is actually to check if you know when will it be a recapture or capital gain under 1231.

    The gift question in that unit is a headache. Go to Becker R4-9 under General rule for gifted property it explains that is rollover basis + any gift paid attributable to net appreciation in gift value. So,

    the gift tax is 19K. But olu to the extent that is attributable to the apreciation of gift taking into consideration the gift tax exclusion of course (nothing is so simple). So teh appreciation was 39k = 65k – 26k and the extent of gift tax exclusion is 51k = 65k – 14k. that ratio (39/51 = .76) times the 19k gift tax paid is the amount by which the rollover basis is increased. A total nightmare.

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1442670
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @aa ahhh yeah I get a one track mind so when I saw the first one was like kind I automatically assumed like kind on the 2nd! That makes sense! Also, thanks for the explanation on the gift tax.

    When is your exam? I need to find a new study partner after you're gone! lol

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1442676
    aatoural
    Participant

    Welcome!

    Next Monday. You and me both are going to need new study partners after Monday. FAR won't be easy alone! Mostly that I am trying to do it on March 10th.

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1442679
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @aa that's a tall task but based on studying audit and now reg with you I'd say you can handle it. It's been awhile but with FAR the one thing I told myself is its a ton of material but if you look at the big picture each chapter is usually 1 topic..if you know the general idea of each chapter and don't fret over the small details it'll save you a lot of headaches. That's the one thing about FAR that was different then the other Becker review courses. You don't have to memorize a thousand things per each chapter–1 chapter 1 topic.

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1442681
    aatoural
    Participant

    That's a good thing. I'm glad to hear that. I really hope I can make it. I would hate to wait until August if I have to re-take in April-May. But I'll try my hardest.

    BTW – I think GLEIM put a lot of effort into gathering the trickiest mcqs for tax, but for Blaw they are at the same level or easier than Becker.

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1442714
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    So liquidating distributions of a corp vs partnership.

    Partnership, property distributed at FMV more times then not you will not recognize a gain UNLESS your boot exceeds your basis.

    Corp, property also distributed at FMV HOWEVER, you will recognize a gain as long as what's received FMV + Boot exceeds your basis…boot exceeding basis is not required

    This is correct right?

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1442723
    Potat0eHead
    Participant

    hey guys, can anyone please explain this solution from becker? (R-2)

    During the year, the Andradis', who were both under age 65, paid the following expenses:
    Unreimbursed costs for prescription drugs required for their dependent daughter's medical condition $ 2,300
    Mrs. Andradis' face lift 4,000
    Physical therapy for their dependent son's soccer injury 3,000
    Massage therapy fees at Mr. Andradis' health club obtained because he enjoys massages 500
    The Andradis' adjusted gross income for the current year was $65,000. What amount could be claimed on the Andradis' current year tax return for medical expenses? a.$4,875 b.$0 c.$5,300 d.$2,300

    Choice “b” is correct. Deductible medical expenses are limited to the amount that exceeds 10% of the taxpayer's adjusted gross income. Deductible medical expenses are those expenses that are “necessary” (such as doctors, prescriptions, required surgery, etc.) Non-deductible expenses are such things as elective surgeries, health club memberships and unnecessary medical expenditures. The Andradis' AGI is $65,000; 10% of that is $6,500. Qualified medical expenses are $2,300 for their daughter's prescriptions and $3,000 for physical therapy for their son. Total allowable gross expenditures of $5,300 are less than the threshold of $6,500. So the answer is zero

    I thought it was 5,300 that are deductible because 2,300 and 3,00 amounts are necessary for necessary med expenses AND its under 10% of AGI

    Many thanks!

    #1442733
    aatoural
    Participant

    I believe for C corp. the corp recognizes gain as if if sold the appreciated property FMV – basis. and so does the shareholder. I didn't understand about what you said with Boot

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1442735
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @aa I'm asking about the gain the shareholder in a Corp recognized and a partner in a partnership recognizes in a liquidating distribution. Might help to put #'s to it.

    Basis 100k sell property with basis of 200k FMV of 250k and 50k in cash

    Shareholder gain = 200k

    Partner Gain = 0

    Since the cash did not exceed the partners basis of 100k no gain is recognized and the basis in the property is 50k (remaining basis)

    Corp sells at FMV (like you said) so its 250 fmv + 50 cash – shareholder basis of 100k = total gain 200k

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1442739
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    Gotta love the Gleim lol.

    Under a written agreement between Mrs. Norma Lowe and an approved religious exempt organization, a 10-year-old girl from Vietnam came to live in Mrs. Lowe’s home on August 1, 2016, in order to be able to start school in the U.S. on September 3, 2016. Mrs. Lowe actually spent $500 for food, clothing, and school supplies for the student during 2016, without receiving any compensation or reimbursement of costs. What portion of the $500 may Mrs. Lowe deduct on her 2016 income tax return as a charitable contribution?
    A. $500
    B. $0
    C. $250
    D. $200

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #1442753
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @re2pect I wanna say B but the fact that you are posting this tells me I'm wrong lol. There is probably some foreign exchange student contribution exception that I have no clue about lol!

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1442762
    Tarheel83
    Participant

    My initial thought was B, but due to the agreement with an exempt organization and the fact that the money is not being reimbursed, I could see the answer possibly being A.

    #1442769
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    I answered B also.

    Answer (D) is correct.
    Amounts paid by a taxpayer to maintain an individual other than a dependent as a member of his or her household under a written agreement between the taxpayer and a qualified organization to provide educational opportunity for pupils or students in private homes are deductible up to $50 per month. The student must attend full-time in the 12th or any lower grade of a qualified educational organization located in the United States. The deduction is only available for the months the child is a full-time student, which is 4 months in this case: September-December. Mrs. Lowe’s expenditures qualify under this provision as a charitable contribution deduction of $200 ($50 × 4 months in 2016).

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #1442774
    RE2PECT
    Participant

    They probably got that one from the EA exam. Ninja and Roger never covered it.

    FAR: 75 Roger & Ninja (notes/flashcards/audio/MCQ)
    AUD: 73, 81
    BEC: 71, retake 8/29
    REG:

    #1442775
    Tarheel83
    Participant

    Btw, I am currently studying for REG in a Hail Mary attempt before the next exam hits in April. Due to the timing and retakes I have to take REG on 2/4.

    Is anyone else feeling overwhelmed by the material at times, but then feeling fairly confident after doing MCQs? I'm using WTB and so far I am doing pretty good on the questions for my first time around (19% of total questions in WTB and holding a 63%).

    So far I have been relying on the NINJA Notes and audio and I have done just a very small amount of reading/videos in CPA Excel.

    I have been tackling the UCC, contract law, property transactions, like kind transactions and individual tax MCQs.

    I am starting to wonder if I am just hitting the easy topics. I hear that Corporate taxes get really hard, I guess I will find out soon.

Viewing 15 replies - 706 through 720 (of 1,482 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 48’ is closed to new replies.