REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 20

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1396511
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q1 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 286 through 300 (of 1,482 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1403952
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @jack no problem. I did confuse myself a bit which you will see later on with my discussion with @teal so if you know my original post is correct let us know.

    Basically feeding off you example if I take on 49k in liabilities and the other party pays 30k in cash and 20k in liabities does that net to a boot of 1k received OR like I said with teal does the liabilities wash out to 0 because you can't have negative liabilities in your equation and give you a final boot received of 30k?

    I just read through the section in the becker book and they don't even touch up on liabilities at all.

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1403963
    Fk
    Participant

    HI,

    Can any one tell me what is the difference between Sec 1250 , sec 1245 and sec 1231 Asset

    #1403975
    Teal
    Participant

    @dtatham maybe this wasn't worth spending so much time on, but I was researching this morning.

    I am thinking your original assumption was correct since boot given was less than boot received, but if anyone knows for a fact, feel free to chime in.

    FAR (66,68) Aug 26
    REG (66) July 25
    AUD (66) December 1st
    BEC - October 3rd

    #1403979
    Fine
    Participant

    Hi all,

    I have been studying REG for almost two months and have been scoring above 90% in Becker review in all chapters but have not been studying SIM so would like some recommendation regarding the SIMs. I am taking the exam Jan 11th so i would really appreciate it if any one can help me with the SIMs as I have never done taxes before. Thank you all for your time and help.

    #1403984
    alialzoubi
    Participant

    A,B,C and D formed X corporation

    Shareholder made the following contribution

    A
    B
    C
    D: my question related to D:he contributed $ 10.000 in cash property worth 40.000 and basis 5.000 with related assumed recorded liability of 20.000.

    My question related to the X basis in D, as per beacker answers was as the following:

    (D) contributed $10,000 cash and property worth $40,000. His gain realized is $35,000 ($40,000 FMV –
    $5,000 basis). The liability relieved of $20,000 exceeds the basis of all property contributed (including cash)
    by $5,000 ($20,000 liability – $10,000 cash – $5,000 property basis = $5,000 excess). Therefore, the
    recognized gain is $5,000. Although it is not asked for in the question, the corporation's basis in the asset
    is equal to the carryover basis of $5,000 plus the $5,000 gain recognized by Token, or $10,000.

    But as per my understanding the answers is the greater of Adj basis or Debt assumed wiche is 20,000

    Please help

    #1404005
    Teal
    Participant

    @alialzoubi That is my understanding too. The liability that the corp assuming is the boot received and therefore $20,000 would be recognized as gain. However, there is one exception – if it is a tax-free exchange, then no gain will be recognized by the contributor. Not sure if this is the case and maybe he is recognizing some of the cash? I don't know….that is very odd.

    FAR (66,68) Aug 26
    REG (66) July 25
    AUD (66) December 1st
    BEC - October 3rd

    #1404027
    alialzoubi
    Participant

    Teal
    Thank you teal,

    I take the req on Dec unfortunately got 69 , I'm trying to go through reg again, The questions above represent simulation on Beacker and still not clear for me

    #1404057
    TXJAM
    Participant

    Anyone use shapes to visualize Agency relationships?

    #1404449
    Namstut
    Participant

    @saleh I would highly recommend doing SIMs. You will definitely test your knowledge of the concepts since these questions are multi-layered and are more complex than MCQs.

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1404483
    Namstut
    Participant

    @alialzoubi

    You have to consider that in this SIM the shareholder also contributed cash, which reduced the amount of gain recognized by the shareholder.

    If he contributed property ONLY with NVB of 5,000 and NO cash and the corporation assumed the loan of $20,000 then his recognized gain would be $15,000.

    Therefore, Corporation's basis in contributed property would be $15,000 gain + $5,000 NBV of the property = $20,000. Which is the same amount as the assumed loan.

    I hope this makes sense.

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1404635
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @ali yeah just reiterating @namstut. With corporation contributions.

    The shareholder recognizes the BASIS whereas the Corp in an indirect way will end up recognizing the FMV. However, the calc doesn't work out by simply stating the corp assumes FMV. They will calculate it by saying the corp gets the basis of the property PLUS the realized gain on the contribution. In your example the $5k is the basis and the 15K is the realized gain which brings you to the 20k.

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1404857
    onthewaytoacpa5
    Participant

    Hi guys,

    I have a quick question based on SIMs that I received on the REG exam.

    If I am asked to fill out information for an estate tax return, but say only 20% of the activities relate to the estate and the other 80% is personal, how would I report all the activities on the estate tax return? Does it depend on the activities that they list? Don't really remember learning this or where I can find more information. I'm using Becker. Thanks in advance!

    Also, any tips on at-risk amounts? I got a SIM on that as well and I'm not too sure how to calculate more advance at-risk amounts/related calculations. Thanks!

    #1404864
    jack yassa
    Participant

    Hello guys,

    I'm confused regarding the Sep and non sep stated items?

    Does it differs from Corporations to Individuals to Partnership?
    Thanks a lot.

    #1404941
    aatoural
    Participant

    yes it does. a C corp is separately taxed entity. There is not separately stated items of income/loss. Just dividend distributions.
    S corps and partnership, each have separately stated items of income.

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1404995
    Teal
    Participant

    Can anyone give an example of at-risk? I am having trouble with it.

    FAR (66,68) Aug 26
    REG (66) July 25
    AUD (66) December 1st
    BEC - October 3rd

Viewing 15 replies - 286 through 300 (of 1,482 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 20’ is closed to new replies.