REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 19

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #1396511
    jeff
    Keymaster

    Welcome to the Q1 2017 CPA Exam Study Group for REG. 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 271 through 285 (of 1,482 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #1403822
    Namstut
    Participant

    @re2pect and @aatoural it seems like posts with any reference to this site are filtered out. It's a large bank of questions on all four parts.

    Happy New Year everyone! I am going to hit some MCQs for the next 2-3 hours and then off to celebrate!

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1403826
    Namstut
    Participant

    cpa review for free

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1403837
    aatoural
    Participant

    I've seen that website namstut, but some questions are very differently worded.

    Happy new year everyone!!!

    BEC - PASSED
    AUD - 8/29/16
    FAR - TBS
    REG - TBS

    #1403847
    Namstut
    Participant

    @aatoural that's why I think that website is great. By now I remember the questions from Becker and I know what the answer is. But do I really know the answer???

    I think it makes you dig into your knowledge and evaluate your weak areas and you know the topic it does not matter how the question is phrased, however, if you are weak in a certain area you can get easily confused by the wording.

    AUD 7/6/16 Passed
    BEC 9/3/16
    FAR TBD
    REG TBD

    #1403907
    LIZZ
    Participant

    Happy New Years Everyone. Its 11pm and I just sat down to study for the day. I had a funeral service and had to to to work for a few hours.

    So help me God this will be the last year I spend with the CPA monkey on my back! I'm passing in 2017.

    FAR - 05/2015
    AUD - 75,11/2014
    REG - 07/2015
    BEC - 09/2015

    #1403918
    jack yassa
    Participant

    Hello Guys,

    I'm really confused about this TBS it's “Like-Kind-exchange”

    A taxpayer exchanged Parcel A, a piece of land used solely for business purposes, for Parcel B and $30,000 cash.

    Parcel A: (relinquished property)
    Fair Value: $299,000
    Basis: $149,000
    Mortgage $49,000

    Parcel B: (property received)
    Basis: $170,000
    Fair Value: $240,000
    Mortgage $20,000
    Cash Received $30,000
    The taxpayer will assume the $20,000 mortgage on Parcel B and the other party to the transaction will assume the $49,000 mortgage on Parcel A.

    The Realized gain is 150,000

    Now does it make any differences if he added the last sentence or not?
    I'm assuming if he didn't add it the answer would be

    A realized gain of 92,000 not 150,000.

    Please help
    And happy new year every one.

    #1403924
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @jack yes you are correct. If they didn't add the last sentence the realized gain drops from 150 to 92k.

    CURRENT:

    Given: 149+20 = 169
    Received: 30+240+49 = 319
    Realized Gain = 150

    DEFER LAST SENTENCE, PARTIES ASSUME MORTGAGES W/ RESPECTIVE LAND:

    Given: 149+49 = 198
    Received: 30+240+20 = 290
    Realized Gain = 92

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1403927
    jack yassa
    Participant

    @dtatham

    And the Recognized would be 50,000
    And Basis 198,000?

    Thanks a lot man.

    #1403930
    Teal
    Participant

    @jack wouldn't the basis be 99,000? (149,000-50,000)

    FAR (66,68) Aug 26
    REG (66) July 25
    AUD (66) December 1st
    BEC - October 3rd

    #1403933
    LIZZ
    Participant

    Ive read this question 10x. Im either sleepy or missing something:

    Graphite Corp. has been a calendar-year S corporation since its inception on January 2, Year 1. On January 1, Year 9, Smith and Tyler each owned 50% of the Graphite stock, in which their respective bases were $12,000 and $9,000. For the year ended December 31, Year 9, Graphite has $80,000 in ordinary business income and $6,000 in tax-exempt income. Graphite made a $53,000 cash distribution to each shareholder on December 31, Year 9. What total amount of income from Graphite is includible in Smith's Year 9 adjusted gross income?

    A.
    $96,000

    B.
    $93,000

    $43,000

    CORRECT

    D.
    $40,000

    In an S corporation, income is taxed when earned, not when distributed, unless distributions exceed owners' share of earnings + basis.
    In this case, Smith gets 50% of ($80,000 taxable income + $6,000 nontaxable income). This yields a new basis of $55,000 ($12,000 beginning basis + $43,000 increase in basis = $55,000), which is greater than distributions. Thus, taxable income is limited to Smith's share of Graphite's taxable income, or 50% of $80,000. After the distribution, Smith's basis is $2,000 (basis of $55,000 reduced by a distribution of $53,000 = $2,000).

    I guess my brain is always thinking about BASIS and not AGI (taxable income).

    Do I have this righ?

    C-CORP – adj AGI @ Distribution
    S-CORP – adj AGI @ Earned income
    – adj Basis @ business activity including non taxable income
    – Exception: Liquidating Disbursement
    Partnership – adj AGI @ Earned income
    – adj Basis @ business activity & “at risk”

    FAR - 05/2015
    AUD - 75,11/2014
    REG - 07/2015
    BEC - 09/2015

    #1403936
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    That's one hell of a new year question! My understanding is liabilities assumed get netted together and are considered in the equation for “boot”. Now depending on how the gain is calculated will impact my basis as well. So I'm inclined to say….

    ORIGINAL:

    Boot Given: 20
    Boot Received: 49+30 = 79
    Recognized Gain (lesser of boot received OR realized gain): 59K
    Basis= 149+20-79+59 = 149

    MODIFIED SCENARIO:

    Boot Given: 49
    Boot Received: 20+30 = 50
    Recognized gain: 1k
    Basis= 149+49-50+1 = 149

    **And just to add I double checked Becker to make sure liabilities assumed go into the equation. If you have Becker there are a series of questions in Chapter 4 that do a great job at reinforcing the like kind exchanges. Specifically question #56 in Property Taxation (CPA-06429)**

    PS: HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1403937
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @lizz yeah you are correct. If you are like me you need to slow down when reading those questions and specifically look at what they are asking. My brain automatically goes into “compute basis” mode, which sounds like you are the same way! haha.

    The only amount that will go into AGI is the proportionate share of income in that problem which is the 50% of the ordinary business income. While the tax exempt income factors into the basis it will not factor into AGI.

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1403940
    Teal
    Participant

    Wow, somehow I missed that you net boot received and boot given for the recognized gain. I always just thought it was limited to boot received.

    FAR (66,68) Aug 26
    REG (66) July 25
    AUD (66) December 1st
    BEC - October 3rd

    #1403945
    HoosierCPA
    Participant

    @teal the way I wrote it out is a bit confusing. You only net the boot when it comes to liabilities assumed, if its cash then what you said is correct. Where I'm not 100% sure and cannot find a comparable example in becker is when you assume more liability then the other party. I think in my example above I would make a slight tweak and bet the liabilities just net to 0 instead of reducing the overall boot…

    MODIFIED SCENARIO:

    Boot Given: 20 (reduced 49 to 20 with logic that it caps at the amount of liabilities received)
    Boot Received: 20+30 = 50
    Recognized gain: 30k
    Basis= 149+20-50+30 = 149

    Again, this liabilities scenario I have never seen play out so I'm speculating on how it's handled, it doesn't make sense in my head why you would net your 49k liabilities assumed against the other parties 20k liabilities and get a negative boot of 29k…this is why I modified my original post. Maybe someone can chime in and give us a more confident answer!

    FAR - 78
    REG - 72,74,71...please just go away REG nobody likes you!
    BEC - 82
    AUD - Aug 16

    #1403949
    jack yassa
    Participant

    @dtatham10
    I got it now yes. thanks a lot man i totally forgot about the net liability.
    That's how i make it

    Realized = 92,000
    Recognized = 1,000
    Deferred= 91,000
    Basis =240,000-91,000= 149,000

    That's so helpful thanks again 🙂

Viewing 15 replies - 271 through 285 (of 1,482 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2017 - Page 19’ is closed to new replies.