REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 76

Viewing 15 replies - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 2,393 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #652171
    Mika
    Participant

    B – $20,000

    Under IRC Section 351, transfers of appreciated property to a controlled corporation (80%) are tax free to the extent they are exchanged solely in exchange for stock in the corporation. If cash or other property is received, gain is recognized equal to the cash and fair market value of other property received, limited by the amount of appreciation in the property transferred to the corporation.

    Dole was the sole owner of Enson, so he meets the control test. He transferred a building with a basis of $35,000 and a fair market value of $55,000, so the building has appreciation of $20,000. Dole received cash of $40,000 and Enson stock worth $15,000 in exchange for the building. Since he received cash, the exchange is not completely tax free.

    The amount taxable is the lesser of the amount of cash received ($40,000) or the appreciation ($20,000), so Dole is taxed on $20,000.

    REG - 80 (02/13/2015) Roger + Ninja Flash Card + Ninja MCQ + Becker's Note
    FAR - 84 (05/29/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Some Wiley book questions
    BEC - 77 (08/27/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions
    AUD - 87 (08/28/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions

    #652172
    wmcpa
    Member

    @Mika do you know what the rule on recognized (if that) with the following is?

    wife owns majority stock of A s-corp

    husband owns majority stock of B s-corp.

    If A sells property to B lower than FMV, is there any gain/loss recognized by any of the (4) parties in the transaction?

    FAR: 83
    REG: 69, 69, retake Q1 2015
    AUD: Q2 2015
    BEC: Q2 2015

    #652173
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @funtimes Holder may become HDC if 1. Gave value for the instrument 2. Took it in good faith 3. unaware of any defects of the instrument. HDC is subject to real defenses but free from personal defenses.

    Pay to order, only the payee specifically named is entitled, bearer means can be presented by anyone in possession of the instrument. Order instrument can be converted to bearer by blank endorsement (merely signing at the back). For example, a check made payable to the order of John Smith is an order instrument. When John signs the back of the check, it became bearer instrument, any person in possession of it can present it to the bank. But if he wrote “Pay to order of Jane Wayne” then signed it then only Jane Wayne is entitled to present the check.

    #652174
    Mika
    Participant

    Ninja #758

    Which of the following organizations would not qualify for exemption from federal income tax?

    A.College alumni association

    B.Social clubs that allow only limited usage by general public

    C.Fraternal society not operating under a lodge system

    D.Political organization

    REG - 80 (02/13/2015) Roger + Ninja Flash Card + Ninja MCQ + Becker's Note
    FAR - 84 (05/29/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Some Wiley book questions
    BEC - 77 (08/27/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions
    AUD - 87 (08/28/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions

    #652175
    Gabe
    Participant

    C @mika

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652176
    Mika
    Participant

    Yes @ Gabe

    REG - 80 (02/13/2015) Roger + Ninja Flash Card + Ninja MCQ + Becker's Note
    FAR - 84 (05/29/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Some Wiley book questions
    BEC - 77 (08/27/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions
    AUD - 87 (08/28/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions

    #652177
    Mika
    Participant

    Mandy is a limited partner in a limited partnership in which Strasburg and Hua are the general partners. Which of the following may Mandy do without losing limited liability protection?

    I. Mandy acts as an agent of the limited partnership.

    II. Mandy votes to remove Strasburg as a general partner.

    a. I only.

    b. II only.

    c. Both I and II.

    d. Neither I nor II.

    REG - 80 (02/13/2015) Roger + Ninja Flash Card + Ninja MCQ + Becker's Note
    FAR - 84 (05/29/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Some Wiley book questions
    BEC - 77 (08/27/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions
    AUD - 87 (08/28/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions

    #652178
    Mika
    Participant

    The Answer is C, according to the answer – “A limited partner is allowed, without losing the protection of limited liability, to act as an agent of the limited partnership. The limited partner may also vote on the removal of a general partner.”

    I am confuse here…I understand if a limited partner participates in the general management of the partnership (writing checks, signing contracts, hiring and firing, and making other management decisions) that individual loses the limited partner liability as limited partners have limited liability

    So isnt the answer be d?

    sigh…Wiley book question always confusing…

    REG - 80 (02/13/2015) Roger + Ninja Flash Card + Ninja MCQ + Becker's Note
    FAR - 84 (05/29/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Some Wiley book questions
    BEC - 77 (08/27/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions
    AUD - 87 (08/28/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions

    #652179
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    amout realized is FMV+ debt assumed by partnership, upon contribution – adj. basis of property transferred= realized gain

    recognized gain= any cash received, any liab's in excess of basis, assumed by partnership on transfer of property.

    partners basis= adj. basis +debt assumed by partnership – decrease in partners share of individual liabilty + plus any gain recognized (i.e liab>basis, any cash received, marketable securities).

    partnerships basis in property= transferor's basis+gain recognized to partner on the contribution.

    is this correct?

    #652180
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    what is the amount realized, realized gain, gain recognized, transferor's basis, and corporation's basis in property contributed to a corporation, with liabilities on the property transferred, assumed by the corporation that qualifies for Section 351 treatment?

    #652181
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    if anybody wants to give me there input, wiley can be a little vague. The basis calculations is the key to fully understanding these subjects everything else is simply learning the tax law for income, deductions and credits. The tax forms and the flow of information on them is straight forward, just need a little understanding.

    #652182
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Mika – That's a great question and I'd like to know the answer too. I would think it's A since they can act as an agent to the partnership but I don't understand how they can participate in voting?

    #652183
    Gabe
    Participant

    Not to be a downer, but if you had to do a re-take, how long would you study? 6 weeks? 5? What material would you use?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652184
    NJPRU
    Member

    @Gabe – you wont have to retake!! lol

    When I had to retaik Audit (I had gotten a 73), I tested again within 3 weeks. lol

    On the REG front, ahhhhh. I'm studying R6 – not too bad, but I'm going through the motions of thinking I'm forgetting things, like adjustments and such. shoot me.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #652185
    Gabe
    Participant

    @NJ thanks 🙂 That's the weird thing…if I failed I won't get to re-take until April…so hang around for a month then start to re-study?

    Also…keep going! Just think, you could be DONE soon! When do you sit?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

Viewing 15 replies - 1,126 through 1,140 (of 2,393 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 76’ is closed to new replies.