REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 66

Viewing 15 replies - 976 through 990 (of 2,393 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #652021
    NJPRU
    Member

    The way that I read it was that the mother GAVE it to her daughter and therefore didn't realize gain/loss on giving it to her (rather than selling it to her). The basis was the price at which the mother purchased it and therefore rolled to her daughter which is the $6,000. When the daughter sold it for $12k, the daughter recognized a gain of $6k.

    I think the 6k would have been netted with the realized loss that the mother would have realized if she had sold it to her daughter for less than what she had purchased it at; however, since she gave it to her daughter, she didn't realize a loss.

    I could be wrong, but that's how I read the problem.

    — sorry, made a few edits. ^^

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #652022
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Gabe Thanks! Good luck to us! I noticed this is your last section.

    On your gift basis question, agree with funtimes, loss, use donor's basis if loss, use lower of DB or FMV (but if loss normally FMV is lower than DB). However, if the selling price is between the DB and FMV then no gain/loss recognized.

    @funtimes – Going back to my notes, guaranteed payment is an ordinary expense. The $45000 is BEFORE guaranteed payment so you have to deduct $7500 to get the net income of $37500 to be allocated to partners. Therefore partner's basis will be $200K + (50% x 37500) = $218750

    #652023
    Gabe
    Participant

    @funtimes thanks! and I agree with post above

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652024
    funtimesNOT
    Member

    THANKS CPAby2015 I was deducting it again! actually I have no idea what I was doing…*brainfart. This study group stuff really works!

    AUDIT - 79
    FAR - 64, 77
    BEC - 69, 71,79 - DONE!
    REG - 60, 75

    Nothing in the 80s ; however, I worked full time the whole time! (like 10 hour days) so it can be done 🙂

    #652025
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I'm pounding MCQs right now and simple words like “not”, “before”, “false”, etc. still get me. I totally agree!

    #652026
    Gabe
    Participant

    Agreed. I love this study group 🙂 I will be posting throughout the day, as it is my last full day of studying. Any help is appreciated!

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652027
    Gabe
    Participant

    On May 8, Westar Corp. sold 20 computers to Saper for use in Saper's business. Saper paid for the computers by executing a promissory note secured by the computers and a security agreement. On May 9, Saper filed a petition in bankruptcy and a trustee was appointed. On May 16, Westar filed a financing statement covering the computers. Westar insists that their perfected security interest takes priority over the trustee in bankruptcy's interest. The trustee in bankruptcy disagrees. Who is correct?

    A Westar, because it perfected its security interest within 30 days after Saper took possession.

    B The trustee, because the petition was filed prior to Westar's filing of the financing statement.

    C The trustee, because filing a bankruptcy petition cuts off Westar's rights as of the filing date.

    D Westar, because its security interest was automatically perfected upon attachment.

    Correct answer is A. Just wanted to clarify- Westar's interest automatically ATTACHES because it is the ordinary course of business but DOESN'T perfect until he files.

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652028
    NJPRU
    Member

    Anyone else think the Becker material in the book poorly represents the types of questions asked in the MCQs? I was doing well with R5 up to this section. ughh.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #652029
    Gabe
    Participant

    I've used the Becker book for all my exams and I've got to say, I did not like it for REG. I plowed through it and did all the MCQs then moved on to NINJA MCQs, which I liked more because of the explanations. I hear the Wiley book is good for REG. Little late for that now though

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652030
    WantThatCPA
    Member

    Which of the following statements is false?

    a. If an individual fails to pay estimated taxes for a year, there is no underpayment penalty due under any circumstances if the balance of tax due at filing is less than $1,000.

    b. If an individual files a tax return with a zero tax liability in the prior year, the individual must pay in at least 90% of the current year's tax to avoid underpayment penalties, as the ability to use the 100% of prior year tax is lost.

    c. If tax payments are withheld from payroll checks, regardless of the dollar amounts withheld at any particular time throughout the year, the payments are deemed to have been paid evenly throughout the year.

    d. The Internal Revenue Service may waive the penalty for underpayment of taxes if the failure to pay was due to casualty, disaster, illness, or death of the taxpayer.

    The answer is B but I thought that if you had zero tax liability in the prior year, this would not satisfy as an estimated tax payment method. Can someone please explain? Unless I'm reading it incorrectly, I think that the statement for B is true and not false.

    #652031
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @Gabe – I think executing the promissory notes attaches the security interest. I thought the filing requirement is 20 days not 30?

    #652032
    s2sylvir
    Member

    @WantThatCPA

    Your understanding is correct, because even B says “the ability to use the 100% of prior year tax is lost”. However, you have to pay estimated taxes somehow, so since you can't use prior year's tax, you must use current year's tax to base your estimates, “the individual must pay in at least 90% of the CURRENT YEAR'S tax to avoid underpayment penalties”.

    BEC - PASS (79)
    AUD - PASS (63, 71, 74, 74, 83)
    REG - PASS (88)
    FAR - PASS (58, 89)

    Becker for all + FAR 10 Point Combo

    #652033
    WantThatCPA
    Member

    @sylvir so you agree with me that choice B is a true statement even though they say the answer that is correct is B which insinuates that B is false. haha confusing. hope you understand what I mean

    #652034
    Gabe
    Participant

    @CPA The 20 day rule is the waiting period for SEC sales…I am blanking on words right now.

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652035
    funtiks
    Participant

    edit

    FAR - 76*, 73, 85
    BEC - 69, 72, 78*, 80
    AUD - 72, 71, 90
    REG - 71, 74, 85

    AFTER 3 YEARS I'M DONE!!!

Viewing 15 replies - 976 through 990 (of 2,393 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 66’ is closed to new replies.