REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 43

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 2,393 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #651675
    leglock
    Participant

    Blackhawk's explanation above clairfies the addbacks for amt of which Becker's explanation is horrible in my opinion. Candidates seem to get confused on this topic. Addbacks are items that are not allowed as deductions (but that you took as deductions for taxable income) and therefore increase taxable income when arriving at amti.

    The deductions you are allowed, meaning not an addback, is charity (only the portion you took as a deduction) and medical, only the portion above 10% of agi that you took as a deduction.

    The credits you are allowed are FACCE.

    #651676
    Gabe
    Participant

    leglock- if I could be so forward. Could you break down AMT calc? I seem to remember a thread somewhere and you knew what you were talking about. I feel like the term “addback” is confusing in itself.

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #651677
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Agrred. Becker's explanation is terrible for this. Once you're given a problem you feel lost so it takes time to adjust.

    Individual AMT:

    PANIC – adjustments. These adjustments can increase or decrease AMT.

    P – passive activity losses: add back or recalculate

    A – accelerated depreciation: real property is different under regular tax and 40 years SL; personal property is difference between regular tax and 150% DL)

    N – Net operating losses: recompute these

    I – Installment sales not allowed: difference is installment method and full accrual method

    C – Completed contract not allowed: must use % of completion. Difference between these two

    TIMME – These are your itemized deductions

    T – Taxes: ADD BACK TAXES

    I – only interest that is okay is mortgage (used to build or improve) anything else ADD BACK

    M – Medical deductions must be in excess of 10% of AGI to deduct (same as an itemized deduction really…)

    M – Misc deductions in excess of 2% AGI ADD BACK (these are not allowed under AMT)

    E – Cannot take any exemptions or standard deduction

    Do all of these calculations and you can see why the AMT is higher. If you really think about it conceptually this is the purpose of AMT… With the 1986 tax act there was a lot of controversy of a tax designed to target rich investors that was recapturing your middle class family deductions… Think about it. Taxes we all have. Interest a lot of us have. Misc deductions… exemptions… This thinking really helped me hammer down the individual AMT.

    FACCE it – FACCE it you can take these credits!

    F – foreign tax credit

    A – adoption credit

    C – Contribution to retirement credit

    C – Child credit

    E – Earned Income Credit

    #651678
    step73121
    Member

    I've been doing Becker MCQs in multiples of 50 for the last few days and have been averaging 90%. I wouldn't necessarily say I've been doing well because I know the answers because I've been going through the problems as if I'm taking the test and not just choosing an answer because I know it. I recently went onto my Wiley test bank and now am averaging mid 60s on practice MCQs. There seems to be a considerable more amount of business law on the Wiley questions. Can anyone attest to which of the Becker or Wiley are similar to the test? After doing a few Wiley tests, my confidence is now rattled.

    REG (1/16/15): 82
    FAR (5/28/15): 78
    AUD (8/20/15): 85
    BEC (10/8/15): 82

    #651679
    terryharm
    Member

    @step73121 same thing happened to me, when I did some Wiley MCQ's they were very heavy in Law, UCC, Agency. I don't remember as many on my exam. It was about 3 days before the exam and I also freaked out, then I did some Ninja Law, UCC, Agency MCQ's (scored high) and then only used Wiley once or twice again and only for specific topics to get additional practice. You can never tell what each persons exams will look like so just make sure you are comfortable with the information. Good Luck.

    BEC: 81
    FAR: 75
    AUD: 81
    REG: 85

    PA license Pending..

    #651680
    Gabe
    Participant

    @step not sure. Never sat for REG, but I think any time you switch test banks your score will be affected. I was scoring in the 80's in Becker, then switched to Ninja and scored 60's. It's just a different way to test your knowledge, which is good and scary.

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #651681
    Gabe
    Participant

    Ok…I am going to make up a super simple question:

    Regular TI: $500,000

    excess accum dep- $20k

    Med deduction (excess of 10%)- $3k

    Mortgage interest- $1k

    Other interest- $2k

    State taxes- $5k

    Standard deduction- $6k

    EIC- $1k

    So…

    $500

    +20k- dep

    +3k- med ded

    +2k- OTHER interest

    +5k- state taxes

    +6k- stand ded

    = 536k AMT income

    Yes?

    =

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #651682
    Gabe
    Participant

    Also found this- https://eyfpc.com/Portals/0/Documents/Tax%20Calculation%20Alternative%20Minimum%20Tax.pdf

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #651683
    knicks92
    Member

    anyone know how to do the schedule m-1 related questions regarding adding or subtracting

    Tough times don't last. Tough people do.

    B: 88
    A: 77
    R: 89
    F:

    #651684
    s2sylvir
    Member

    @knicks92 Can you be more specific?

    BEC - PASS (79)
    AUD - PASS (63, 71, 74, 74, 83)
    REG - PASS (88)
    FAR - PASS (58, 89)

    Becker for all + FAR 10 Point Combo

    #651685
    Mika
    Participant

    @Knicks92 it depends on how the question asked. If the question give you a book income and ask for tax income, then you need to added back federal tax, minus muni bond interest etc. If the question ask for book income and give you the tax income, you do it the other way.

    REG - 80 (02/13/2015) Roger + Ninja Flash Card + Ninja MCQ + Becker's Note
    FAR - 84 (05/29/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Some Wiley book questions
    BEC - 77 (08/27/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions
    AUD - 87 (08/28/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions

    #651686
    knicks92
    Member

    @mika is there a rule for like what is added for book and what is added for tax?

    Tough times don't last. Tough people do.

    B: 88
    A: 77
    R: 89
    F:

    #651687
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @gabe Yes this is the correct approach you've got it… but don't think of the AMT computation like that considering you lumpe lumped the credit in there. AMT tax base x tac % = tentative tax rate THEN WE MINUS THE CREDITS HERE. I would just be aware of this because it used to trick me. Never seen a question that calls for the computation of it though.

    Hopefully i'll get a disastrous SIM to make my day Monday on it 🙂

    #651688
    Mika
    Participant

    @knicks92 Rules like

    – Add back:

    Fines

    Rent in tax > FS

    Federal income Tax

    Net Capital loss

    Excess charitable contributions

    Excess depreciation

    Meals & Entertainment (50%)

    Lobbying expenses

    Premiums on officer life insurance (payable to corp.)

    Interest exp on the debt incurred to carry the municipal bonds

    – Minus:

    Depreciation in tax > FS

    Municipal bond interest

    REG - 80 (02/13/2015) Roger + Ninja Flash Card + Ninja MCQ + Becker's Note
    FAR - 84 (05/29/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Some Wiley book questions
    BEC - 77 (08/27/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions
    AUD - 87 (08/28/2015) Roger + Ninja MCQ + Half Wiley book questions

    #651689
    funtiks
    Participant

    Leker exchanged a van that was used exclusively for business and had an adjusted tax basis of $20,000 for a new van. The new van had a fair market value of $10,000, and Leker also received $3,000 in cash. What was Leker's tax basis in the acquired van?

    Basis of old property $ 20,000

    Less: Boot received (3,000)

    New basis $ 17,000

    WHY ARE THEY USING BASIS OF OLD PROPERTY?

    Im starting at the book and it clearly says in like kind excahnge its

    FMV of like kind property received – deferred gain

    FAR - 76*, 73, 85
    BEC - 69, 72, 78*, 80
    AUD - 72, 71, 90
    REG - 71, 74, 85

    AFTER 3 YEARS I'M DONE!!!

Viewing 15 replies - 631 through 645 (of 2,393 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 43’ is closed to new replies.