REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 141

Viewing 15 replies - 2,101 through 2,115 (of 2,393 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #653155
    NJPRU
    Member

    ahh I remember doing that one.

    Purchased 600 shares at 30 = 18,000

    2 for 1 stock split = value does not change, stays at 18,000. 1200 shares (600 shares purchased x 2) at 15 = 18,000

    3 for 2 stock split = value, again, does not change, stays at 18,000. 1,800 shares (1200 shares x 3 =3,600 but then it says its 3 for 2 so I would assume you'd devide the 3600 by 2 to get 1,800] at 10 = 18,000

    Says they sold 1,225 @ 9 a share = 11,025

    You have 1,225 @ 10 = 12,250

    = loss of 1,225

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #653156
    Gabe
    Participant

    Thank you both!

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #653157

    Taking my exam at 11:30!! Pray I remember all of the crap I have jammed into my brain this last month. 🙂 Just need it to stick with me the next 5 hours. I will let you guys know how things go!

    FAR - Passed (82)
    BEC - Passed (76)
    AUD - Passed (89)
    REG - Passed! (81)
    AICPA Ethics

    Licensed CPA

    #653158
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @FIFO: best of luck!!! you'll be a CPA after 5 hours!!!!

    #653159
    Gabe
    Participant

    Get it FIFO!

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #653160
    Gabe
    Participant

    Miller's mother incurred unreimbursed medical expenses during the year totaling $4,200. Because she was unable to pay these medical expenses herself, Miller paid them on her behalf. Miller cannot claim the mother as a dependent solely because her gross income is $10,000.

    The answer: Medical expenses paid for Miller and his dependents are deductible. Although Miller’s mother is not his dependent, for the purposes of Schedule A, she can be considered a dependent if the only reason preventing that status is the gross income test. (IRC Section 213(a))

    Is this true?

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #653161
    BEACPA
    Participant

    Gabe,

    Sorry, I don't have anything valuable. Just wanted to say that I ran into the above mentioned question the other night and was thrown for a loop. I didn't think he could claim the medical expenses since his mom had income above the exemption. My only thought was he could gift it by sending the payment directly to the medical institution. It's not clear cut. I don't recall reading this in the text or hearing about it in the lecture videos. I'm curious too.

    How are your studies going? Let's hang in there, we're almost done with this circle of hell.

    FAR - 2/28/14 PASS Praise be to God!
    AUD - 7/5/14 PASS Praise be to God!
    BEC - 11/29/14PASS Praise be to God!
    REG - 2/28/14 PASS Praise be to God!

    #653162
    NJPRU
    Member

    Gabe – I found this on the IRS website. Its publication 502 (2014). I think what it says is what your question is trying to explain. You can claim medical expenses for a depenedent even if they don't meat the income test and even if they filed jointly. Also, see below that for Section 213. So, yes, it's true.

    _____________________________________________________

    Publication 502:

    Dependent

    You can include medical expenses you paid for your dependent. For you to include these expenses, the person must have been your dependent either at the time the medical services were provided or at the time you paid the expenses. A person generally qualifies as your dependent for purposes of the medical expense deduction if both of the following requirements are met.

    1.The person was a qualifying child (defined later) or a qualifying relative (defined later), and

    2.The person was a U.S. citizen or national or a resident of the United States, Canada, or Mexico. If your qualifying child was adopted, see Exception for adopted child , later.

    You can include medical expenses you paid for an individual that would have been your dependent except that:

    1.He or she received gross income of $3,950 or more in 2014,

    2.He or she filed a joint return for 2014, or

    3.You, or your spouse if filing jointly, could be claimed as a dependent on someone else's 2014 return.

    _______________________________________________________

    Section 213a

    “(a) Allowance of deduction

    There shall be allowed as a deduction the expenses paid during the taxable year, not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, for medical care of the taxpayer, his spouse, or a dependent (as defined in section 152, determined without regard to subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and (d)(1)(B) thereof), to the extent that such expenses exceed 10 percent of adjusted gross income.”

    In section 152:

    (b)(1): “(1) Dependents ineligible

    If an individual is a dependent of a taxpayer for any taxable year of such taxpayer beginning in a calendar year, such individual shall be treated as having no dependents for any taxable year of such individual beginning in such calendar year.”

    (b)(2): “(2) Married dependents

    An individual shall not be treated as a dependent of a taxpayer under subsection (a) if such individual has made a joint return with the individual’s spouse under section 6013 for the taxable year beginning in the calendar year in which the taxable year of the taxpayer begins.”

    (d)(1)(B): “whose gross income for the calendar year in which such taxable year begins is less than the exemption amount (as defined in section 151 (d)),”

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #653163
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I have pretty much mastered the Becker REG chapters for all of the tax material(R1-R4 & R5) but I have done basically zero on the Business Law material in chapters R6-R8. I only have a few days before I sit for the REG section. How important is it that I cover all of the business law material, and if I do not have enough time to cover it all what topics should I focus on/ have been tested most recently?

    #653164
    NJPRU
    Member

    The becker final test vs actual test scores are giving me hope today!!

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #653165
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @DebitKredit: B6 – 8 makes up about 20% of the exam so I'd say it's fairly important to review it. Contract and Sales law, Agency, Business Structure for sure.

    At least you hit B5 since that's another 20% of the exam in that one chapter alone.

    Good luck!

    #653166
    Gabe
    Participant

    @NJ I have total faith in you 🙂

    @debit agreed- do NOT skimp on Blaw…especially this quarter, as it seems to be heavily tested. Key points to hit were mentioned above. good luck!

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #653167
    PasstheCPA7
    Participant

    Hi everyone,

    Can someone explain what exactly a tax shelter is? I have come across this term numerous times,but, don't know exactly what it is. If you can provide an example of a tax shelter, that would be great. Thanks.

    #653168
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I keep seeing this question and I don't get what's what. Computer-generated itemized deductions generated by software package or just some other computer? Taxpayer paid less based on what? Where did the amount Wilson entered in his computer come from?

    Wilson, CPA, uses a commercial tax software package to prepare clients’ individual income tax returns. Upon reviewing a client’s computer-generated Year 1 itemized deductions, Wilson discovers that the schedule’s deductible investment interest expense is less than the amount paid by the taxpayer and the amount that Wilson entered into the computer. After analyzing the entire tax return, Wilson determines that the computer-generated investment interest expense deduction is correct. Why is the computer-generated investment interest expense deduction correct?

    #653169
    Tre
    Member

    Anjanja,

    The question is asking why is there less investment expense on the tax return than the number he input. There is no need for numbers or where the numbers are coming from. The investment expense is a passive loss and passive losses are limited to the passive gains. So the question is asking you to recognize a passive loss rule.

    BEC - 84
    REG - 88
    FAR - 75
    AUD - 71, Nov 2015

Viewing 15 replies - 2,101 through 2,115 (of 2,393 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 141’ is closed to new replies.