- This topic has 2,393 replies, 160 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 11 months ago by
jordancole.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 20, 2014 at 6:25 pm #190226
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 24, 2015 at 4:52 pm #653155
NJPRUMemberahh I remember doing that one.
Purchased 600 shares at 30 = 18,000
2 for 1 stock split = value does not change, stays at 18,000. 1200 shares (600 shares purchased x 2) at 15 = 18,000
3 for 2 stock split = value, again, does not change, stays at 18,000. 1,800 shares (1200 shares x 3 =3,600 but then it says its 3 for 2 so I would assume you'd devide the 3600 by 2 to get 1,800] at 10 = 18,000
Says they sold 1,225 @ 9 a share = 11,025
You have 1,225 @ 10 = 12,250
= loss of 1,225
AUD: DONE
FAR: DONE
BEC: DONE
REG: DONEIM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!
February 24, 2015 at 5:02 pm #653156
GabeParticipantThank you both!
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016February 24, 2015 at 5:59 pm #653157
FIFOisbetterthanLIFOParticipantTaking my exam at 11:30!! Pray I remember all of the crap I have jammed into my brain this last month. 🙂 Just need it to stick with me the next 5 hours. I will let you guys know how things go!
FAR - Passed (82)
BEC - Passed (76)
AUD - Passed (89)
REG - Passed! (81)
AICPA EthicsLicensed CPA
February 24, 2015 at 6:04 pm #653158
AnonymousInactive@FIFO: best of luck!!! you'll be a CPA after 5 hours!!!!
February 24, 2015 at 6:08 pm #653159
GabeParticipantGet it FIFO!
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016February 24, 2015 at 6:08 pm #653160
GabeParticipantMiller's mother incurred unreimbursed medical expenses during the year totaling $4,200. Because she was unable to pay these medical expenses herself, Miller paid them on her behalf. Miller cannot claim the mother as a dependent solely because her gross income is $10,000.
The answer: Medical expenses paid for Miller and his dependents are deductible. Although Miller’s mother is not his dependent, for the purposes of Schedule A, she can be considered a dependent if the only reason preventing that status is the gross income test. (IRC Section 213(a))
Is this true?
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016February 24, 2015 at 6:30 pm #653161
BEACPAParticipantGabe,
Sorry, I don't have anything valuable. Just wanted to say that I ran into the above mentioned question the other night and was thrown for a loop. I didn't think he could claim the medical expenses since his mom had income above the exemption. My only thought was he could gift it by sending the payment directly to the medical institution. It's not clear cut. I don't recall reading this in the text or hearing about it in the lecture videos. I'm curious too.
How are your studies going? Let's hang in there, we're almost done with this circle of hell.
FAR - 2/28/14 PASS Praise be to God!
AUD - 7/5/14 PASS Praise be to God!
BEC - 11/29/14PASS Praise be to God!
REG - 2/28/14 PASS Praise be to God!February 24, 2015 at 6:41 pm #653162
NJPRUMemberGabe – I found this on the IRS website. Its publication 502 (2014). I think what it says is what your question is trying to explain. You can claim medical expenses for a depenedent even if they don't meat the income test and even if they filed jointly. Also, see below that for Section 213. So, yes, it's true.
_____________________________________________________
Publication 502:
Dependent
You can include medical expenses you paid for your dependent. For you to include these expenses, the person must have been your dependent either at the time the medical services were provided or at the time you paid the expenses. A person generally qualifies as your dependent for purposes of the medical expense deduction if both of the following requirements are met.
1.The person was a qualifying child (defined later) or a qualifying relative (defined later), and
2.The person was a U.S. citizen or national or a resident of the United States, Canada, or Mexico. If your qualifying child was adopted, see Exception for adopted child , later.
You can include medical expenses you paid for an individual that would have been your dependent except that:
1.He or she received gross income of $3,950 or more in 2014,
2.He or she filed a joint return for 2014, or
3.You, or your spouse if filing jointly, could be claimed as a dependent on someone else's 2014 return.
_______________________________________________________
Section 213a
“(a) Allowance of deduction
There shall be allowed as a deduction the expenses paid during the taxable year, not compensated for by insurance or otherwise, for medical care of the taxpayer, his spouse, or a dependent (as defined in section 152, determined without regard to subsections (b)(1), (b)(2), and (d)(1)(B) thereof), to the extent that such expenses exceed 10 percent of adjusted gross income.”
In section 152:
(b)(1): “(1) Dependents ineligible
If an individual is a dependent of a taxpayer for any taxable year of such taxpayer beginning in a calendar year, such individual shall be treated as having no dependents for any taxable year of such individual beginning in such calendar year.”
(b)(2): “(2) Married dependents
An individual shall not be treated as a dependent of a taxpayer under subsection (a) if such individual has made a joint return with the individual’s spouse under section 6013 for the taxable year beginning in the calendar year in which the taxable year of the taxpayer begins.”
(d)(1)(B): “whose gross income for the calendar year in which such taxable year begins is less than the exemption amount (as defined in section 151 (d)),”
AUD: DONE
FAR: DONE
BEC: DONE
REG: DONEIM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!
February 24, 2015 at 6:56 pm #653163
AnonymousInactiveI have pretty much mastered the Becker REG chapters for all of the tax material(R1-R4 & R5) but I have done basically zero on the Business Law material in chapters R6-R8. I only have a few days before I sit for the REG section. How important is it that I cover all of the business law material, and if I do not have enough time to cover it all what topics should I focus on/ have been tested most recently?
February 24, 2015 at 8:56 pm #653164
NJPRUMemberFebruary 24, 2015 at 9:05 pm #653165
AnonymousInactive@DebitKredit: B6 – 8 makes up about 20% of the exam so I'd say it's fairly important to review it. Contract and Sales law, Agency, Business Structure for sure.
At least you hit B5 since that's another 20% of the exam in that one chapter alone.
Good luck!
February 24, 2015 at 9:58 pm #653166
GabeParticipant@NJ I have total faith in you 🙂
@debit agreed- do NOT skimp on Blaw…especially this quarter, as it seems to be heavily tested. Key points to hit were mentioned above. good luck!
CPA, CFE
CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016February 24, 2015 at 10:29 pm #653167
PasstheCPA7ParticipantHi everyone,
Can someone explain what exactly a tax shelter is? I have come across this term numerous times,but, don't know exactly what it is. If you can provide an example of a tax shelter, that would be great. Thanks.
February 24, 2015 at 10:58 pm #653168
AnonymousInactiveI keep seeing this question and I don't get what's what. Computer-generated itemized deductions generated by software package or just some other computer? Taxpayer paid less based on what? Where did the amount Wilson entered in his computer come from?
Wilson, CPA, uses a commercial tax software package to prepare clients’ individual income tax returns. Upon reviewing a client’s computer-generated Year 1 itemized deductions, Wilson discovers that the schedule’s deductible investment interest expense is less than the amount paid by the taxpayer and the amount that Wilson entered into the computer. After analyzing the entire tax return, Wilson determines that the computer-generated investment interest expense deduction is correct. Why is the computer-generated investment interest expense deduction correct?
February 24, 2015 at 11:03 pm #653169
TreMemberAnjanja,
The question is asking why is there less investment expense on the tax return than the number he input. There is no need for numbers or where the numbers are coming from. The investment expense is a passive loss and passive losses are limited to the passive gains. So the question is asking you to recognize a passive loss rule.
BEC - 84
REG - 88
FAR - 75
AUD - 71, Nov 2015 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 141’ is closed to new replies.
