REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 128

Viewing 15 replies - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 2,393 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #652957
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    What is a lookback rule?

    A.

    The taxpayer is required to recalculate the annual profit reported on a contract.

    B.

    The taxpayer is required to defer recognition of income.

    C.

    The taxpayer can delay recognition of income.

    D.

    The taxpayer deducts the costs during the period and reduces that period's revenue.

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #652958
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Lookback rule, D?

    #652959
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    Correct is A ,

    Under a lookback rule, the taxpayer is required to recalculate the annual profit reported on a contract. In other words, it requires the taxpayer to substitute the actual costs and revenues for the estimated revenues and costs used in the percentage-of-completion method.

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #652960
    Gabe
    Participant

    A. Think of it as, when you're done with a project, you LOOK BACK and see how close your estimates were to the actual costs/revenue.

    CPA, CFE
    CISA- Experience will be completed by August 2016

    #652961
    WANNABE_CPA
    Member

    I am having a moment of doubt right now regarding Blaw. That was my weak section last time, and i feel like i am still not good at it. Still have most of the topics of Blaw that i am not confident with. I want to take a final test on Sunday before starting final revision for my test on 25th. So thinking of exclusively spending time on all topics, subtopics of Blaw individually today and tomorrow. I feel somewhat ok with Tax, i had original plan to keep doing ninja mcqs from all topics which now does not feel right.

    I am trending at 64% right now, with only 21% on Blaw. I have just attempted about 340 questions from Ninja yet.

    Motivation and strategy for Blaw lacking, help 🙁

    FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
    BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
    REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
    AUD : 69,67, 07/23

    #652962
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    EDITED:

    Voidable Contracts:

    [SIM] 1-S; 4-I; 3-M

    S – Simple Duress

    I – Incompetency => Mental Incompetency

    I – Influence => Undue Influence

    I – Inducement => Fraud In the Inducement

    I – Intoxication

    M – Minors

    M – Mistake => Mutual Mistake

    M – Mistake => Unilateral Mistake – Material or other party knew about the mistake

    Prior….

    Voidable Contracts:

    [SIM] 1-S; 5-I; 3-M

    S – Simple Duress

    I – Incompetent =>Legally Incompetent Persons

    I – Incompetency => Mental Incompetency

    I – Influence => Undue Influence

    I – Inducement => Fraud In the Inducement

    I – Intoxication

    M – Minors

    M – Mistake => Mutual Mistake

    M – Mistake => Unilateral Mistake

    #652963
    NJPRU
    Member

    Feel better Gabe! I'm feeling VERY run down today. I developed a case of insomnia through studying for this exam and I think its finally catching up to me. Took a half day from work today to sleep and work on R7. ARGHHH!

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #652964
    NJPRU
    Member

    Amor: I could have sworn that if you were legally adjudicated as incompetent that it would be a voided (not voidable) contract.. and with a unilateral mistake – it's generally enforceable (and not voidable) UNLESS it's a material mistake and the other party new about the mistake.. then that would make it voidable.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #652965
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @NJ, thanks for correcting my post. I edited it.

    So, “legally” incompetent means there's already a court's formal judgment?

    You're right about the unilateral mistake. I had it hyphenated (with ‘material') on my old notes from excel file but missed to catch it when transferring it to my word notes. I am glad to correct my notes now too.

    Thanks again!

    #652966
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    @NJ, what about the “Mistakes as to material facts”?

    I've categorized this item under unenforceable. Would that be correct?

    #652967
    NJPRU
    Member

    @Amor – to my knowledge, if it a material (unilateral) mistake, and the other party knew about it, then it's voidable; however, if the other party did not know about it, then it's enforceable.

    I believe Olinto gave the following event as an example:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/21/us-jpmorgan-gm-court-idUSKBN0KU2AY20150121

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #652968
    lauren725
    Member

    Two individuals are planning to form a business with equal ownership. The individuals would like to limit their personal

    liability, avoid double taxation, and be active in the business. Which of the following organizational structures would

    meet their requirements?

    a. General partnership.

    b. Limited liability company.

    c. C corporation.

    d. Limited partnership

    answer: B – I just want to confirm- this makes sense to me but I guess I got confused when I read that “most states now allow only one person to form an LLC”. Does this mean that only one person can form it, but it can have multiple members?

    AUD - 73,91
    FAR - 79 - Thank you God!
    BEC - 73,79!!!!
    REG - 92 whatttt??!

    I used Becker review + flashcards, Ninja Audio, Ninja MCQ supplement on BEC and REG.

    Done! Praise God!

    #652969
    NJPRU
    Member

    Lauren – the way that I remember LLC is two fold.. one, it's taxed like a partnership which we learned in R4 and two, my cousin operates his business as an LLC even though he is the only member in the company. Yes, he has employees underneath him, but no one else is a partner in the company.

    AUD: DONE
    FAR: DONE
    BEC: DONE
    REG: DONE

    IM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!

    #652970
    s2sylvir
    Member

    @lauren725

    LLCs can be formed by one person or multiple people. LLCs can be taxed in one of 4 ways: sole proprietorship (aka single member LLC), partnership, S corp, and C corp.

    If one person forms it, it is a single member LLC, reported on an individual's 1040, Sch C (as business income).

    If multiple people form it, then it's multiple members, an becomes it's own entity (partnership, C corp, or S corp depending on what the members decide). For NJPR's comment above, by default an LLC with multiple members is a partnership. C corporation and S corporation statuses must be elected.

    I think that clears up your question… Hopefully!

    BEC - PASS (79)
    AUD - PASS (63, 71, 74, 74, 83)
    REG - PASS (88)
    FAR - PASS (58, 89)

    Becker for all + FAR 10 Point Combo

    #652971
    lauren725
    Member

    Thank you both! That clears it up!!

    AUD - 73,91
    FAR - 79 - Thank you God!
    BEC - 73,79!!!!
    REG - 92 whatttt??!

    I used Becker review + flashcards, Ninja Audio, Ninja MCQ supplement on BEC and REG.

    Done! Praise God!

Viewing 15 replies - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 2,393 total)
  • The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 128’ is closed to new replies.