- This topic has 2,393 replies, 160 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 11 months ago by
jordancole.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 20, 2014 at 6:25 pm #190226
jeffKeymasterFree Study Planner, Notes, Audio, Flashcards: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-study-plan/
Free CPA Exam Survival Guide: https://www.another71.com/cpa-exam-survival-guide/
-
AuthorReplies
-
February 7, 2015 at 3:40 am #652562
AnonymousInactivenext saturday. I reviewed it briefly today it's ok I feel like if I look at it again the day before/morning of the exam I will be fine. I cant imagine them asking TOO MANY questions on that specific topic.
I am so sick of studying I am starting to make stupid mistakes on the questions that i am practicing on that I know for sure i could get right a week ago/if my mind was in the right place. I still have to review business law again because I probably forgot everything from those chapters and I have yet to do any of the Becker exams (plan on doing on either tomorrow or sunday). Really dont know what to expect with those.
February 7, 2015 at 4:35 am #652563
AnonymousInactiveBanks Corp., a calendar year corporation, reimburses employees for properly substantiated qualifying business meal expenses. The employees are present at the meals, which are neither lavish nor extravagant, and the reimbursement is not treated as wages subject to withholdings. What percentage of the meal expense may Banks deduct?
a. 50%
b. 100%
c. 80%
d. 0%
Explanation
Choice “a” is correct. Only 50% of business meal and entertainment expense is deductible.
Choices “d”, “c”, and “b” are incorrect. Each of these is an incorrect percentage.
What if the question asks, “What percentage of the meal expense may an employee deduct?”
How different it will be for a nonaccountable or accountable business meal reimbursement reporting? I remember encountering a question with “nonaccountable” reporting that's somehow 50% or 100% taxable/deductible. Which is which?
February 7, 2015 at 8:15 am #652564
jennyh1MemberI believe incentive stock option is used to Calculate AMT. If you have any other info, please let me know.
I believe Beckers doesnt have enough questions for MCQ.
REG 67 (01/11) 68(11/12) 67(05/13) 61(08/13) 68(10/13) 68(05/14) 71(09/14) 68(12/14) --- Using Becker, not enough MCQ
BEC 69 (11/12) 46(05/13) 70(08/13) 70(10/13) 68(02/14) 78(05/14) ** Thanks to Wiley CPA, Using Becker....
FAR
AUDMaterial: Becker (not enough MCQ)! I did not buy additional MCQ question from Becker
February 7, 2015 at 12:39 pm #652565
AnonymousInactiveDoes anyone have notes to share about C Corporations Formation in recognizing basis of property and stocks? Thanks.
February 7, 2015 at 3:23 pm #652566
TncincyParticipant@AmorD, Do you have ninja notes?
It begins with a 75
Been here too long as a cheerleader....ready to passFebruary 7, 2015 at 3:57 pm #652567
NotTooLateMemberI am really confused about Sec. 179 2013 or 2014 figure. Here is a question:
A taxpayer purchased and placed in service during the year a $761,000 piece of equipment. The equipment is 7-year property. The first-year depreciation for 7-year property is 14.29%. There is an allowable Section 179 limit in 2014 of $25,000. What amount is the maximum allowable depreciation without using bonus depreciation?
A. $25,000
B. $105,174
C. $130,174
D. $108,747
I choose D, because for 2014, Sec 179 says business can deduct $25,000 from the purchase, but the amount will be lose dollar to dollar if the total purchase is over $200,000. In this question, since the total is $761,000, is far over 200,000, so I just go ahead apply MACRS rate to the total purchase price. But it was wrong. The correction answer is C, after deducting $25,000 Sec 179 amount.
Could somebody possibly tell me why? Thanks!
AUD:5/30/2013 (74, so close!) 5/2014 (90 first pass!)
REG: 2/27/2015 (85)
FAR: 8/2011(64) 4/2012(74) 8/31/2015 (80 finally!)
BEC: 11/24/2015 Let's do this!February 7, 2015 at 5:35 pm #652568
AnonymousInactive@tncincy, thanks. Yes, I do have NINJA notes. I literally forgot I had it. I am so overwhelmed with my own notes late last night. I could neither get the concept straight and nor get the answer right even with my open notes. It's so tricky even when I was trying to apply practical reasoning in selling/distribution of property, recognizing gain, and determining the basis.
February 7, 2015 at 7:44 pm #652569
NJPRUMemberFINALLY finished up R8 including optional questions. a day and a half ahead of schedule… R1 is up!
Hope everyone is having a successful weekend! Good luck. 🙂
AUD: DONE
FAR: DONE
BEC: DONE
REG: DONEIM GOING TO BE A CPA!!!!!
February 7, 2015 at 9:31 pm #652570
AnonymousInactiveAztec, a C corporation, distributed an asset to Burn, a shareholder. The asset had a fair market value of $30,000 and was subject to a $40,000 liability, assumed by Burn. The asset had an adjusted basis of $25,000. What amount of gain must Aztec recognize?
a. $0
b. $15,000
c. $5,000
d. $10,000
Explanation
Choice “b” is correct. When a corporation distributes assets to a shareholder, the corporation recognizes a gain as if it had sold the asset. The gain is calculated as follows:
$40,000 Amount realized (Greater of FMV of asset OR Liability assumed by the shareholder)
-$25,000 Less: Adjusted basis of property sold
$15,000 Realized and recognized gain
=======
Choices “a”, “c”, and “d” are incorrect per the above explanation.
I took into account the {1st} exception here that when it's over 80% ownership, no G/L recognized.
However, {per 2nd exception} since liability assumed is more than the adjusted basis, a gain is recognized. I've seen two formulas for gain and I am not so sure when to use them appropriately.
a) FMV — AB = Gain
b) Amt. Realized* — AB = Gain ……………………… ( *Greater of FMV or Liability Assumed)
February 7, 2015 at 10:01 pm #652571
AnonymousInactivefor DRDs, what do you deduct as DRD if both the percentage of taxable income and the percentage of the dividend both create a NOL? Is it the lesser of the two or always the dividend percentage? I've never had a problem like this come up, but just trying to play it safe
February 7, 2015 at 10:15 pm #652572
AnonymousInactiveSoooo.. I had a lot of theory slash law questions on my exam. YIKES. To those people who asked if farming or ISO is important, well, it is. *hint* I just feel like you have to know the entire textbook since it is not like university where you can “predict” what's going to be on the exam! The waiting begins… *fingers crossed*
This REG exam reminds me of my FAR exam. I had a lot of theory questions on my FAR exam than calculations.
February 7, 2015 at 10:16 pm #652573
AnonymousInactiveI am probably going to start studying for AUD tomorrow or whenever and man, more theory. This is so exciting… 😐
February 7, 2015 at 10:27 pm #652574
AnonymousInactiveFebruary 7, 2015 at 10:35 pm #652575
lauren725Membercpasucks – you would take the percentage of dividend if it would create an NOL. You would ignore the % of taxable income in that case.
AUD - 73,91
FAR - 79 - Thank you God!
BEC - 73,79!!!!
REG - 92 whatttt??!I used Becker review + flashcards, Ninja Audio, Ninja MCQ supplement on BEC and REG.
Done! Praise God!
February 8, 2015 at 1:57 am #652576
WANNABE_CPAMemberWhich of the following types of conduct renders a contract voidable?
A.
Mutual mistake as to facts forming the basis of the contract
B.
Unbreached contract
C.
Duress through physical compulsion
D.
Duress through threats of a civil suit
FAR : 68, 74, 83 Thank you God 🙂
BEC : 78 (8/27) 🙂
REG : 72 ,80 (2/25) 🙂
AUD : 69,67, 07/23 -
AuthorReplies
- The topic ‘REG Study Group Q1 2015 - Page 102’ is closed to new replies.
