[REG] Exam Prep and Score Releases: January-February 2010 - Page 4

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 1,628 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #221179
    MPoni123
    Participant

    my friend ordered the FARE final review from Becker and she said that it mentioned 15 – 20% of MCQ are test questions!

    AUD - 84; REG - 90; BEC - 79; FAR - 75; ALL DONE!!

    #221180
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi Anna,

    I wish you all the best in your REG exam, could you please tell me the business law percentage in your previous exam window for Reg , some friends told me they had only 20% business law questions in their exam ?

    regards

    #221181
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hey Francois,

    Thank you for wishes:-)

    I don't think I can estimate that precisely, I just don't remember (plus, even if I could, Jeff would probably remind us about disclosure rules).

    But Business Law section was not challeging on the exam at all, I wouldn't worry about it, as long as you review everything that is in your materials.

    Taxation caused me more problems (and my score report proved it).

    Hope it helps.

    Best,

    Anna

    #221182
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Thanks Anna, i appreciate it , good luck.

    Bonne chance

    Francois

    #221183
    AARON
    Participant

    I'm re-taking REG on 1/15 after receiving a 74 on 11/4.

    Hitting the books 8 hours a day to re-review.

    God bless and good luck everyone!

    ? AUD - 87 (8/12/09)
    ? REG - 77 (1/15/10
    ? BEC - 77 (1/6/09 - Expired) / 79 (11/18/10)
    ? FAR - 75 (2/11/11)

    #221184
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Hi! I took BEC yesterday, and I'm starting to study for REG now. Using Becker materials and Final Review. I plan to take REG at the end of February.

    #221185
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Okay fellow REGers. I am a little confused. I am not sure if this question has been asked. In the Becker question (Reg-2 I believe) It talks about damage to personal property. On one answer it uses $500 exclusion and on another it uses $100. Can anyone help me understand these two different numbers. If you need more specifics please ask and I will look them up! Thanks!!!

    #221186
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Are you talking about personal casualties and theft losses?

    Which are calculated, I believe, as:

    $ Loss

    (Insurance proceeds)

    ($100 floor) – I think that is what you're referring to?

    (10% of AGI)

    =========

    Casualty loss itemized deduction.

    If this is what you are asking about – then it's $100 exclusion.

    #221187
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Yes that is is but there was 2 problems where Becker used $500. what is that about?

    #221188
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Are you sure it's about same thing, or you're reading it correctly?

    Maybe there is a mistake?

    Which Becker material are you using? If 2009 – can you give reference number?

    Or just copy and paste solution.

    #221189
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    I think there was $500 exclusion for something… but for something else, not casualty loss.

    #221190
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Okay the $500 is the 2009 number per casualty/event of a nonbusiness casualty/theft loss….what is the $100 that Becker was using?

    Loss is also reduced by Insurace recovery and 10% AGI, could it have been the 10% of AGI????

    #221191
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The $500 is the statutory floor for each casualty loss during 2009. It had been $100 in prior years. The deductibility of the casualty loss is reduced by any insurance proceeds received and then only to the extent that the remaining loss exceeds 10% of the taxpayer's AGI. Keep in mind the amount of the loss for each event is the lesser of (1) basis or (2) decline in fair market value.

    For example, suppose you have three qualifying losses and an AGI of $20,000. The first loss is $1,800, the second is $5,000 with insurance proceeds of $6,000, and the third is $4,500. The first and third losses are each reduced by the $500 statutory floor (2009) so they are limited to $1,300 and $4,000, respectively. The second loss is completely offset by insurance proceeds and results in a $1,000 gain that offsets part of the aforementioned losses. The net casualty loss before the AGI threshold is then $4,300 ((1,300 + 4,000) – 1,000). The deduction available on Schedule A is the residual amount over 10% of AGI, or in this case $2,300 (4,300 – (20,000/10)).

    #221192
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So then disregard the question where the $100 was used? Thanks for your help, I appreciate it!!!

    #221193
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Well, ain't that great. Wiley 2010 book uses $100. Becker 2009 book uses $100. I wonder what Phil Yeager will say about that… I'm confused now.

Viewing 15 replies - 46 through 60 (of 1,628 total)
  • The topic ‘[REG] Exam Prep and Score Releases: January-February 2010 - Page 4’ is closed to new replies.